• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.15 no.9
• /
• pp.1833-1839
• /
• 2011

In this study, Global Gravitational Model EGM2008, EGM96 and 16,786 gravity points measured on land were compared and analyzed. On the assumption that land gravity data is most accurate, the correlation coefficient, differences, MSE and difference variance along the height were computed between land gravity data and EGM2008, EG96. The correlation coefficient, land gravity data and EGM2008, was computed most largely with 0.824 and the correlation coefficient with EGM96 was computed with 0.538. The standard deviation of differences between land gravity and EGM2008, EGM96 were 13.196 magl, 18.685 mgal respectively. Also the difference variance scope of EGM2008 was smaller than EGM96. There was no large variance of free-air anomaly differences between land gravity data and EGM2008 along the height however free-air anomaly differences with EGM96 varied along the height changes. Consequently EGM2008 nicely expresses Korea gravity field more than EGM96.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association of Geographic Inforamtion Studies Conference
• /
• 2008.10a
• /
• pp.203-204
• /
• 2008

EGM96 지구중력장모델을 개선시킨 EGM2008 지구중력장모델이 미국 NGA에 의해 발표됨에 따라, 본 연구에서는 EGM2008지구중력장모델을 한반도 지역을 대상으로 최대차수 360으로 해석하여 기존의 지구중력장모델인 EGM96(360차수) 및 EIGEN-GL04C(360차수)와 비교하였다. 또한 EGM2008은 기존의 구면조화분석한계인 360차수를 뛰어넘고 있으므로 격자 간격 $30'{\times}30'$ 및 $15'{\times}15'$, 그리고 $10'{\times}10'$로 각각 해석하여 지오이드고를 계산하고 정확도를 평가하였다. 정확도 평가는 우리나라의 수준점에서 GPS측량을 실시한 464점의 GPS/leveling 데이터를 활용하였다. 평가결과 EGM2008(360차수)은 $-0.100{\pm}0.183m$를 나타내 EGM96(360차수)결과인 $0.156{\pm}0.238m$에 비해 상당한 정확도의 개선을 가져왔으며, 2190차수의 고차항으로 해석한 결과 $-0.069{\pm}0.140m$ 더욱 정확한 결과를 얻을 수 있음을 확인하였다.

• Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.117-126
• /
• 2008

Earth geopotential models were used to determine the reference surface in geoid modelling and many global geopotential models were developed after 1980's. Nowadays, EGM96 and EIGEN-GL04C geopotential models have been most widely used in the world, but what so called EGM2008 earth geopotential model were developed in 2008 by NGA. In this paper, we intended to compare the results of spherical harmonic analyses using the three geopotential model, EGM96, EIGEN-GL04C and EGM2008. So, the spherical harmonic analyses were performed up to degree and order 360(in case of EGM2008, up to degree and order 720, 1440, 2190 in addition), on each $1'{\times}1'$grid point in and around Korean peninsula. Geometric geoid were calculated at 464 GPS/leveling points for accuracy evaluation and then the results of three geopotential models were compared to geometric geoid. The results show that the accuracy of EGM2008 is improved considerablely compared to EGM96 and EIGEN-GL04C and it is possible to calculate geoidal heights within 14cm standard deviation and 5.5cm standard deviation after LSC fitting in and around Korean peninsula using EGM2008 geopotential model.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.29 no.1D
• /
• pp.161-166
• /
• 2009

High-resolution, high-precision ultra-high degree earth gravitational model are significant for the development of geodesy, geophysics, geodynamics and oceanography. In this research, we introduces the ultra-high earth gravitational model EGM2008 recently announced by U.S. NGA, reviews the issues and status of the ultra-high degree gravitational model development, and analyzes the accuracy of the gravitational model in Korea. First, EGM2008 is compared with the gravitational model EGM96 and Korea high-precision hybrid geoid model KGEOID08. In addition, the absolute accuracy is evaluated by ellipsoid height and orthometric height of a satellite geodetic reference point. Overall, the results show a similar accuracy between EGM2008 and KGEOID08. Thus, EGM2008 will be helpful for the future development of regional geoid and analysis of global gravity field.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.131-139
• /
• 1997

Geopotential models were used to determine the reference surface in geoid modelling and until now, OSU91A model has been most widely used in the world. But what so called EGM96, GSFC/DMA geopotential model published in the latter half of the 1996 by GSFC/DMA project. In this paper, we intended to compare the results of spherical harmonic analyses using the both geopotential model and the spherical harmonic analyses performed up to degree and order 300 and the gravimetric geoidal heights considering gravity data on each $3'\times{3'}$ grid point in and around Korean peninsula. The results showed that the average geoidal height of study area computed from EGM96 is larger 0.40 m than that computed from OSU91A and the gravimetric geoidal heights us-ing EGM96 is larger 0.35 m than that using OSU91A model.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.8 no.9
• /
• pp.274-280
• /
• 2008

The new high order Earth's gravity Model(EGM2008) are expected to improve the application about the Earth's global gravity field. The objectives of this research are to present characteristics on the geoid heights of provinces in South KOREA which calculated from the height anomalies by Earth Gravity Models. For this, seven EGMs (EGM2008<2,190>, EGM2008<360>, EGM96, EIGEN-GL04C, EIGEN-CG03C, EIGEN-GL04S1, and ITG-Grace02S) selected. Geoid heights of fifty BM check points by GPS/levelling are compared with those by NORI-05 model and seven EGMs. And also, geoid heights of 30"$\times$30" grid points in land(sixes blocks ; $1^{\circ}\times1^{\circ}$ sampled) and sea (four blocks ; $1^{\circ}\times1^{\circ}$ sampled) areas of South KOREA by EGM2008 are compared with those by NORI-05 and six EGMs. The results show that geoid heights obtained from EGM2008(2,190) of NGA displayed the nearest results to those by GPS/levelling.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.353-358
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate a new geopotential model, EIGEN-CG01C which had been developed from CHAMP and GRACE mission observations and surface gravity data. The accuracy analysis was conducted by comparing the geoidal heights computed from two types of geopotential models (i.e., EIGEN-CG01C and EGM96) with spirit leveled GPS bench mark. To this end, three hundred twenty GPS leveled bench marks are used as bases for the numerical investigation. From the analysis, it was possible to conclude that EIGEN-CG01C was more suitable to upgrade the KGEOID 98 since the results that the EGM96 was slightly biased.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.33-39
• /
• 1999

In order to calculate geoidal height refered to Bessel ellipsoid, methods to translate geoidal heights from a certain coordinate system to an arbitrary system with the corresponding ellipsoid are studied. and geoidal heights refered to Bessel ellipsoid were computed from EGM96 Model refered to GRS80 using iteration method pro-posed in this paper. Transformation parameters between WGS84 and Bessel were calculated using geoidal heights computed from iteration method. The result of coordinate transformation(standard deviation) were 0.009 second in latitude and 0.006 in longitude and 0.393m in orthometric height.

• International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics Korean Journal of Geophysical Research
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.15-22
• /
• 1997

The GPS/levelling geoid calculated from GPS survey that data at 123 bench marks represents an appropriate regional geoid of the southern Korean peninsula. The GPS/levelling geoid fits best to the geoid calculated from the EGM96 geopotential model of degree and order to 360 with RMS difference 0.176 m. The good agreement of the GPS/levelling geoid with the EGM96 geoid suggests that the bench mark network is well established in Korea and the EGM96 geopotential model well represents the gravity field in the southern Korean peninsula.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.45-52
• /
• 2004

It can be classified in various methods to get the geoidal heights. It can be achieved geometric geoidal heights if we do GPS surveying in leveling point. The aims of this paper are calculation of geometric geoidal heights using GPS/leveling data in study area and evaluation of the global and local geoid models in and around Korean peninsula. For this study, study area was selected in the leveling line from Kunsan to Chonju city and GPS surveying was accomplished in the leveling line. And, also spherical harmonic analysis was made on the three global geopotential models, OSU91A, EGM96, EGM96m under same condition. Then the differences were calculated between geometric geoidal heights and geoidal heights of 3 geopotential models, KOGD2002 which was Korean gravimetric geoid model. The results shows that EGM96m is the best model because the differences between geoidal heights of E6M96m and geometric geoidal heights of GPS/Leveling data appear the smallest value among them.