• 한국식품위생안전성학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.198-202
• /
• 2004

잔류물질 간이 시험법으로 EEC-4 plate test와 Charm II test가 항생물질과 합성항균제 잔류검사에 널리 이용되고 있는 바, 이들 상호간의 결과 수치를 비교, 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. EEC-4 plate혹은 Charm II 에서 양성으로 나타난 돈육 71건에 대하여 HPLC로 정량 분석한 결과, only tetracyclines 46건, only sulfonamides와 solfonamides+tetracyclines가 각각 4건씩, amphenicols+tetracyclines와 amphenicols+sulfonamides+tetracyclines가 각각 1건씩 검출되었고, 15건에서는 검출되지 않았다. Sulfonamides 계열에서 검출된 9건의 경우, Charm-II test 결과 수치가 낮은 경우에 정량 검출량이 높게 나타났고, EEC-4 plate test 결과 pH 6.0, pH 7.2, pH 8.0 모두에서 양성으로 나타나는 등 두 시험방법 간에 연관성이 있었고, chloramphenicols 계열에서 검출된 2건과 검출되지 않은 7건의 경우, Charm-II test결과 수치가 낮은 경우에는 오히려 정량 검출되지 않았으나, control point 근방의 양성 수치에서는 검출량이 높게 나타날 뿐 아니라 EEC-4 plate test에서도 pH6.0, pH7.2, pH8.0 모두에서 양성으로 나타나는 등 두 시험방법 간에 연관성이 있었다. 한편, tetracycline계열의 경우, EEC-4 plate와 Cham-II간에 연관성은 없었다. 또한, EEC-4 plate와 Charm II에서 각각 양성을 나타내었으나 HPLC에서는 검출되지 않는 경우는 tetracyclines계열에서는 $10.5\%(6/57)$, sulfonamides계열의 경우는 없었고, chloramphenicols계열의 경우는 $81.8\%(9/11)$로 각각 나타나 EEC-4 plate와 Charm II가 세 가지 잔류물질 시험에 대한 screening method로서 적합함을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국식품위생안전성학회지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.307-314
• /
• 1996

The European Economic Community four plate test(EEC 4-plate test, FPT, EU) has been used for monitoring antimicrobial drug residues in meat by Local Veterinary Service Center in Korea. This study was performed to evaluate sensitivity and group specificity of some antimicrobial drugs in FPT and to compare FPT with Charm II test. The minimal detectable levels of targeted antimicrobial drugs tested with standard solutions were 0.025∼1.0 ppm for 7 beta-lactams, 0.5∼1.0 ppm for 4 aminoglycosides, 0.05∼0.5 ppm for 5 macrolides, 0.05∼0.25 ppm for 3 tetracyclines and 0.25&1.0 ppm for 6 sulfonamides. In comparison of FPT and Charm II test, the results of FPT were not accord with those of Charm II test having the group specificity of seven families of antimicrobial drugs in meat samples except some families like tetracyclines.

• 한국동물위생학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.161-168
• /
• 1997

This study was undertaken to determined the sulfamethazine residues In urine, serum and muscle of slaughtered pigs(n: 230) by the method of TLC, EEC-4-plate and HPLC. 1. Inhibition diameter characteristics of reference bacterial substance by EEC-4-plate method and antibacterial inhibition zone was appeared sulfonamides in BS pH 7.2 2. Residual sulfamethazine was detceted from 7 serum(3.04%) and 10 urine(4.35%) by TLC test and concentration of residues was higher In urine than serum. 3. Residual sulfamethazine was detected from 9 muscle(3.91%) by EEC-4-plate method. 4. Positive samples by TLC test and EEC-4-plate method were exceed 0.1ppm quantitative analysis from 7 muscle(3.04%).

• 한국동물위생학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.63-69
• /
• 1991

Antibiotic residues of raw milks collected in Anyang area were tested by TTC-reduction test, EEC-4plate method and TLC(SOS-kit ) method to improve and monitor the quality of milk. Antibiotic substances were not detected from 100 raw milk samples, but sulfamethazine was detected from only one sample(1.3PPM) by SOS test. Unclassified anti-microbic substances were detected from 22 samples by EEC-4 plate method. EEC-4 plate test was useful to categorize the species of antibacterial substances and SOS test was useful to detect the sulfamethazine field screening test.

• 한국수산과학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.256-260
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 EEC 4-plate법과 그 변법 그리고 식품공전상 간이검사법으로써 어류질병의 예방 및 치료에 사용되는 28종류의 항균물질에 대한 최저 검출한계를 서로 비교하여 어체내 잔류 항균물질의 최적 간이검사법 (bioassay)으로서의 유효성을 확인하고자 하였다. 식품공전상 간이검사법은 PCs에 뛰어난 검출감도를 나타내었으며 AGs에 대하여 좋은 감도를 보였으나 TCs, MLs, NFs, QNs에 대해서는 낮은 검출감도를 나타내었다. 한편, SAs에 대하여는 대단히 저조한 감도를 보였다. EEC 4-plate변법은 TCs에 대하여 우수한 검출감도를 나타내었다. EEC 4-plate법 및 그 변법은 PCs, MLs, NFs, QNs, SAs에 대하여 상대적으로 높은 검출감도를 나타내었다. 시험법들은 모두 CMs에 대하여는 검출감도가 낮았다. 결국 EEC 4-plate 변법이 여러계열의 항균물질에 대해 검출감도가 뛰어나고 항균활성의 범위가 넓어 어체내 잔류 항균성물질을 가장 유효하게 스크리닝할 수 있는 간이검사법으로 확인되었다.

• 한국동물위생학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.331-338
• /
• 2006

This survey was carried out to detect the residual antibiotics in beef (n = 1,071), pork (n=7,837) and chicken (n=1,536) from slaughter houses in Gyeongbuk province by EEC-4 plate method, Charm II and HPLC during 2005. Residues of antibiotic were detected from 9 beef (0.8%) and 119pork (1.52%) by EEC-4 plate method, and total positive rates were 1.23% (128). 126 samples of the 128 positive samples by the EEC-4 plate method were detected by charm II test. 128 samples were classified as tetracyclines 110 (95.5%), ${\beta}$-lactam 2 (1.6%), sulfonamide 22 (17.2%), quinolone 1 (0.8%). The highest residual concentration of oxytetracycline, tetracycline, chlor-tetracycline, penicillin, sulfamethazine, sulfadimethoxine, sulfaquinoxaline, sulfamerazine, sulfamonomethoxine and enrofloxacin were 7.57, 0.27, 0.40, 0.24, 14.24, 4.33, 8.59, 0.12, 0.09 and 1.98 ppm, respectively and 49 samples were exceeded legal admitted levels.

• 한국동물위생학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.225-233
• /
• 1997

In an effort to Improve the quality of meat and to monitor farms, residual tetracyclines in local beef and pork produced in the province of North Chung-cheong were determined by a EEC 4-plate, Charm II and HPLC, respectively. The results were summarized as follows ; 1. Of the 547 samples, 4 beef and 13 pork samples were judged to be positive by EEC 4 - plate method. 2. Detection rates of tetracyclines by type 1(++--) and type 2(+++ or ++$\pm$-) micro-bial growth Inhibition In EEC 4-plate method were 100% and 71%, respectively. 3. Of 17 positive samples, 6 were positive for tetracyclines, 4 were positive for tetracyclines and sulfonamides, 1 was positive for sulfonamides, and 2 were positive for others by Charm II test. 4. The best eluents were 0.01M methanolic oxalic acid, and the ideal temperature for stable concentration was $40^{\circ}C$ as optimal HPLC analytical conditions for the detection of tetracy-clines. 5. Of the 10 positive samples for tetracyclines by Charm II test, tetracyclines were confirmed in 2 beef and 6 pork samples, using HPLC, at levels ranging from 3.64~4.22 ppm and 0.2~1.20 ppm, respectively.

• 한국동물위생학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.17-29
• /
• 2004

A multiresidual analysis was performed to determine 12 sulfonamides(sulfacetamide, sulfadiazine, sulfisomidine, sulfathiazole, sulfapyridine, sulfamerazine, sulfamethazine, sulfamonomethoxine, sulfisoxazole, sulfamethoxazole, sulfaquinoxaline, and sulfadimethoxine) in beef and pork simultaneously. The multiresidual analysis for the sulfonamides currently used was able to analyze 5 kinds of sulfonamides at the same time. The method of this 12 sulfonamides multiresidual analysis in this study was matrix solid-phase dispersion(MSPD) by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS). The recovery rate of the materials was measured by MSPD method with 3 different extraction solvents; Dichloromethane, DCM: Ethylacetate(3:1), DCM:EA(9:1). Also, samples (84 beef and 205 pork samples) which were positive by EEC-4 plate test from 2001 to 2003 were tested to investigate the kinds of sulfonamides using HPLC. The results from the study were as follows; 1. The recovery rate of the materials was measured by MSPD method with 3 different extraction solvents; Dichloromethane, DCM:Ethylacetate(3:1), DCM:EA(9:1). The method of extraction solvent with DCM:ethyl acetate(9:1) was the most excellent(87.7∼99.3%) in separation and reappearance. 2. In the LC/MS analysis. of sulfonamides, signal to noise ratio was showed relatively high in the positive mode and special ion in the quality analysis was determined via [M+H]$\^$+/ and m/z 156. A spectrum of sulfonamides was showed from all 12 sulfonamides. 3. The samples positive by the EEC-4 plate, a screening test method, were categorized by sulfonamides through Charm II and confirmed the kinds of sulfonamides through HPLC. 1) Among 84 beef samples positive by EEC-4 plate, 20 samples were positive by Charm II and identified as 7 sulfamethazine, 9 sulfadimethoxine, 1 sulfamonomethoxine and 3 unknown status. 2) Among 205 pork samples positive by EEC-4 plate, 42 samples were positive by Charm II and identified as 19 sulfamethazine, 1 sulfadimethoxine, 4 sulfamonomethoxine and 5 unknown status.

• 한국어병학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.77-81
• /
• 1998

실험에는 Bacillus subtilis BGA, Bacillus cereus var. mycoides ATCC 11778, Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341을 상법에 따라 제작하여 muller hinton agar(Difco)에 각각 접종한 뒤, 3가지 조건의 pH가 조정된 검사용 평판배지(plate)인 B. subtilis(pH 6.0), B. cereus(pH 6.0), B. subtilis(pH7.2), B. subtilis(pH 8.0), M. luteus(pH 8.0)의 EEC 4-plate변법을 이용하였다. 넙치에 옥시테트라싸이클린(OTC)을 농도 100 mg/kg/day으로 단 1회 강제 경구 투여한 후 1일, 3일, 5일, 10일, 15일, 20일, 25일 30일마다 3마리씩 채취하여 시료의 처리를 각각 달리한 근육직접법, 추출디스크법, 직접디스크법의 3종류 간이스크리닝법으로써 OTC의 잔존유무를 분석하였다 B. subtilis(pH 6.0)배지는 투여 후 1일째 근육직접법에서만 양성반응으로 의심되는 의양성 반응(${\pm}$)을 나타내었을 뿐 30일까지 간이스크리닝법 3종류가 모두 음성 반응을 나타내었다. B. subtilis(7.2), B. subtilis(8.0), M. luteus(8.0)배지는 투여 후 1일째부터 30일까지 간이스크리닝법 3종류가 모두 음성반응을 나타내었다. 그러나 B. cereus(pH 6.0)배지는 1일째부터 15일까지 간이스크리닝법 3종류가 모두 명확한 양성반응, 투여 후 20일째 근육직접법과 직접디스크법은 의양성반응(${\pm}$)을 보였으나 추출디스크법은 분명한 음성반응, 그리고 투여 후 25일째 및 30일째는 시험조작법 모두가 음성반응을 나타내었다. 따라서 근육직접법, 추출디스크법, 직접디스크법의 간이스크리닝법 3종류는 OTC의 양성반응 판정에 커다란 차이가 없었으며, B. cereus는 OTC의 모니터링에 유효한 균주라는 사실을 확인하였다.

• 한국동물위생학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.281-286
• /
• 2009

Fluoroquinolones in muscle and egg were separated by liquid extraction and determined. The analysis was carried out using following conditions; C18 column ($150{\times}4.6mm$, $5{\mu}m$), mobile phase composed of D.W. (containing 0.4% triethylamine and phosphoric acid) : methanol : acetonitrile (780:100:120, v/v/v), quarternary pump at a flow rate of 0.9ml/min and $20{\mu}l$ of injection volume, fluorescence detector with EX 278nm/Em 456nm. The calibration range of seven fluoroquinolones showed linearity ($r^2{\geq}0.999$) at concentration range of $0.025{\sim}0.8{\mu}g/ml$. The recoveries in fortified muscle and egg represented more than 81.3%. The detection limits for ofloxacin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, danofloxacin, saraloxacin and orbifloxacin were 3.1, 2.5, 3.6, 1.7, 0.9, 2.5 and $2.1{\mu}g/kg$, respectively. We also monitored fluoroquinolones residue in the sample (chicken muscle 182, cattle muscle 140, pig muscle 139, egg 212) using EEC-plate (E. coli ATCC 11303) screening and HPLC confirmation methods. The screening test results, fluoroquinolones, antibacterial substances were all negative.