• Childhood Kidney Diseases
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 1998

Purpose : To evaluate the diagnostic value of dipstick urinalysis($Multistix^{(R)}$) as a screening test for urinary tract infection(UTI) in acute febrile children. Methods : We compared dipstick uinalysis (leukocyte estease(LE) and nitrite) with microscopic urinalysis (WBC and bacteria) and urine culture in 80 children with UTI and 605 children without UTI, who were admitted due to acute fever at EWHA Womans University Hospital between Oct. 1994 and Feb. 1996. Results : 1) In dipstick urinalysis, LE and nitrite were positive in 38.7%, and 13.8% of 80 children with UTI and in 2.1%. and 1.2% of 605 children without UTI. 2) In microscopic urinalysis, WBC and bacteria were positive in 31.2%, and 17.5% of 80 children with UTI and in 4.1%, and 0.6% of 605 children without UTI. 3) Positive rate of LE on dipstick urinalysis was 38.7%, which was significantly higher than 31.5% of WBC on microscopic urinalysis (P<0.05). Positive rate of nitrite was not significantly different to that of bacteria. 4) Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of dipstick urinalysis were 43.7%, 98.3%, 63.6%, 92.9% which were not significant different to 40.0%, 99.0%, 54.0%, 92.3% of microscopic urinalysis. The sensitivity of combined dipstick and microscopic urinalysis were still low(50%). 5) Additional positive rate of microscopic urinalysis to negative dipstick urinalysis was 6.3%(5/80) in 80 children with UTI. Conclusion : The sensitivity of dipstick urinalysis was low and additional value of microscopic urinalysis was minimal in febrile UTI. So urine culture is mandatory in acute febrile children even though dipstick and microscopic urinalysis are negative.

• Childhood Kidney Diseases
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.35-41
• /
• 2013

Routine urinalysis is a simple, economical, and useful test that facilitates the detection of urinary system diseases and monitoring of renal disease progression. It consists of 4 parts of specimen evaluation, gross examination, a dipstick urinalysis, and a sediment microscopic urinalysis. Urine specimens should first be evaluated in terms of acceptability, and thereafter, the gross appearance is examined for color, turbidity, and odor. In particular, a dipstick urinalysis is an easy and rapid test that provides information on the multiple physicochemical properties of the urine sample. Moreover, although a sediment microscopic urinalysis is time-consuming, it provides information on the cells, microorganisms, casts, and crystals. In the present report, the clinical significance of the routine urinalysis and the problems concerning interpretation are summarized.

• Childhood Kidney Diseases
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.42-48
• /
• 2013

The urinalysis is an essential part of the diagnostic work-up for kidney disease and other renal system disorders. The dipstick test allows rapid and simultaneous chemical analyses of urine, including factors such as pH, specific gravity, protein, glucose, ketones, occult blood, bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite, and leukocyte-esterase. The chemical reactions on dipstick are complicated and can be affected by oxidizing, reducing, and discoloring substances in the urine. Therefore, false positive and false negative results are common in dipstick testing. To obtain reliable results with the dipstick, it is necessary to collect urine cleanly and examine the urine carefully. It is mandatory to clearly understand the principles of dipstick testing to evaluate abnormal findings. If the urine dipstick results suggest hematuria, proteinuria, or urinary tract infection, microscopy of the urine should be performed to confirm the findings.

• Journal of Biosystems Engineering
• /
• v.33 no.5
• /
• pp.340-347
• /
• 2008

Dipstick urinalysis is used as a routine test for a screening test of UTI (urinary tract infection) in primary practice because urine dipstick test is simple. The result of dipstick urinalysis brings medical professionals to make a microscopic examination and urine culture for exact UTI diagnosis, therefore it is emphasized on a role of screening test. The objective of this study was to the classification between UTI patients and normal subjects using hybrid neural network classifier with enhanced clustering performance in urine dipstick screening test. In order to propose a classifier, we made a hybrid neural network which combines with RBF layer, summation & normalization layer and L VQ artificial neural network layer. For the demonstration of proposed hybrid neural network, we compared proposed classifier with various artificial neural networks such as back-propagation, RBFNN and PNN method. As a result, classification performance of proposed classifier was able to classify 95.81% of the normal subjects and 83.87% of the UTI patients, total average 90.72% according to validation dataset. The proposed classifier confirms better performance than other classifiers. Therefore the application of such a proposed classifier expect to utilize telemedicine to classify between UTI patients and normal subjects in the future.

• Childhood Kidney Diseases
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.117-122
• /
• 1999

Purpose : We studied the correlation between urinalysis and radiologic findings in infants and children with urinary tract infection. Method : Urine Dipstick test and unstained urine microscopic examination were carried out in 56 infants and children who were hospitallized with the diagnosis of urinary infection by pocitive urine culture at Seoul Adventist from September 1996 through August 1998. Urine was collected by midsream, catheter, urine bag after cleansing or bladder puncture. Renal sonography and $^{99m}Tc-DMSA$ renal scan or voiding cystoureterography were studied. Results : 1)In dipstick analysis, leukocyte esterase(LE) were positive in 30 cases of 56 patients(54%) and Nitrite were positive in 20 cases of 56 patients(36%) and LE or Nitrite were positive in 38 cases of 56 children with UTI(68%). 2)In microscopic analysis, WBC were positive in 38 cases of patients(68%) and bacteria were positive in 23 cases of 56 patients(41%) and WBC or bacteria were positive in 41 cases of 56 children with UTI(71%). 3)Ten cases of 56 UTI patients(18%) showed negative finding in Dipstick and microscopic analysis. 4)There was no significant difference in positive rate of dipstick(71% vs 66%) and microscopia analysis(83% vs 66%) between two group with or without renal scar on $^{99m}Tc-DMSA$ scan (P=0.117). 5)There was no significnt difference in positive rate of dipstick(100% vs 91%) and microscopic analysis(100% vs 100%) between two groups with or without vesicoureteral reflux on VCUG. Conclusion : There was no specific relationships between the abnormal urinalysis and the abnormal findings on $^{99m}Tc-DMSA$ scan or VCUG.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.115-120
• /
• 1984

To find clinical significance of routine "dipstick" urinalysis on admission, we analyzed the results of the "dipstick" urinalyses performed in 844 patients admitted to the pediatric department of Yeungnam University hospital from May 1, 1983 to October 31, 1984. Ketonuria, proteinuria, hematuria and glucosuria were found in 9.5%, 4.9%, 2.4% and 1.1% of the patients respectively. There were no significant differences by sex, age and presence of fever. However, proteinuria and ketonuria were found more frequently in the patients with dehydration (p<0.05). The degree of ketonuria showed a positive association w:th the severity of dehydration (p<0.005). All of the patients with proteinuria and ketonuria showed negative results on follow up. However, among 13 patients with hematura, 9 patients showed negative results and 4 patients had persistent hematuria on follow up. These 4 patients were found to have chronic pyelonephritis (2), asymptomatic urinary tract infection (1) and benign recurrent hematuria (1). This routine "dipstick" urinalysis on admission seems to be simple test which is useful in detecting unrecognized kidney and other urinary tract disease.

• Journal of Sensor Science and Technology
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.169-175
• /
• 2010

Urinalysis is an important clinical test to diagnose urinary diseases, and dipstick method with visual inspection is widely applied in practice. Automated optical devices recently developed have disadvantages of long measurement time, big size and heavy weight, accuracy degradation with time, etc. The present study proposed a new computer scanning technique, in which the test strip and the standard chart were simultaneously scanned to remove any environmental artifacts, followed by automated differentiation with the minimum distance algorithm, leading to significant enhancement of accuracy. Experiments demonstrated an accuracy of 100 % in that all test results were identical with the human visual inspection. The present technique only uses a personal computer with scanner and shortens the test time to a great degree. The results are also stored and accumulated for later use which can be transmitted to remote locations through a network, thus could be easily integrated to any ubiquitous health care systems.

• Journal of Veterinary Science
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.14.1-14.11
• /
• 2021

Background: Quantitation of urine protein is important in dogs with chronic kidney disease. Various analyzers are used to measure urine protein-to-creatinine ratios (UPCR). Objectives: This study aimed to compare the UPCR obtained by three types of analyzers (automated wet chemistry analyzer, in-house dry chemistry analyzer, and dipstick reading device) and investigate whether the differences could affect clinical decision process. Methods: Urine samples were collected from 115 dogs. UPCR values were obtained using three analyzers. Bland-Altman and Passing Bablok tests were used to analyze agreement between the UPCR values. Urine samples were classified as normal or proteinuria based on the UPCR values obtained by each analyzer and concordance in the classification evaluated with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: Passing and Bablok regression showed that there were proportional as well as constant difference between UPCR values obtained by a dipstick reading device and those obtained by the other analyzers. The concordance in the classification of proteinuria was very high (κ = 0.82) between the automated wet chemistry analyzer and in-house dry chemistry analyzer, while the dipstick reading device showed moderate concordance with the automated wet chemistry analyzer (κ = 0.52) and in-house dry chemistry analyzer (κ = 0.53). Conclusions: Although the urine dipstick test is simple and a widely used point-of-care test, our results indicate that UPCR values obtained by the dipstick test are not appropriate for clinical use. Inter-instrumental variability may affect clinical decision process based on UPCR values and should be emphasized in veterinary practice.

• Childhood Kidney Diseases
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.69-73
• /
• 2022

Proteinuria is an early hallmark of kidney disease and a major risk factor for systemic cardiovascular diseases. There are several methods to measure proteinuria, such as the urine dipstick test, 24-hour urinary protein excretion method, and spot urine for the protein-to-creatinine ratio. The urine dipstick test is simple but inaccurate. The 24-hour urinary protein excretion method is the gold standard; however, it is cumbersome, especially in children. Spot urine for the protein-to-creatinine ratio is simple and accurate, but has limitations. Specific urinary protein such as albumin can be measured instead of the total protein content. Tests should be avoided in situations that cause transient proteinuria or false-positive results. It should be performed correctly, and its limitations should be recognized and interpreted accurately.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.42-52
• /
• 1991

Two types of urine dipstick assays, Multistix-SG and Combur-9-test RL, were compared for compatibility, accuracy, specificity and predictive values of a positive and negative test in 501 patients urine and artificially prepared specimen. We found that the results of semiquantitative tests of Multistix-SG and Combur-9-Test RL performed were statistically similar in patients specimen. The urinary leukocyte estrase tests of Combur-9-Test RL assays compared with urine sediment microscopy in regard to compatibility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a positive and negative test 83.7%, 48.1%, 90.3%, 47.4% and 90.1%, respectively. The urinar nitrite tests of Comber-9-Test RL assays compared with urine culture tests, in regard to compatibility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a positive and negative tests were 90.3%, 19.4%, 84.7%, 53.8% and 94.1%, respectively. For the urinary protein, the sulfosalicylic acid method was the most sensitive test for any kinds of protein, and Multistix-SG appeared more sensitive than Compur-9-Test RL for the albuminuria. For the urinary bilirubin and glusose, two dipstick assays were similar in their diganostic efficiency. Finally in the urinary occult blood tests, Combur-9-Test RL assays was more sensitive than Multistix-SG.