• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.967-987
• /
• 1996

The present study was to evaluate the healing patterns of guided tissue regeneration( GTR) using resorbable $Vicryl^{(R)}$(polyglactin 910) mesh and nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene(ePTFE) membrane with or without bone grafting using autogeneous bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft(DFDBA) in the grade II furcation defects. Mucoperiosteal flaps were reflected buccally in the mandibular 2nd, 3rd and 4th premolar areas and furcation defects were created surgically by removing $5{\times}6mm$ alveolar bone in 4 dogs. Root surfaces were thoroughly debrided of periodontal ligament and cementum, and notches were placed on root surface at the most apical bone level. In the right and left mandibular quadrant, each tooth was received $Vicryl^{(R)}$ mesh(ACE Surgical Supply Co., USA) only, $Vicryl^{(R)}$ mesh with DFDBA, $Vicryl^{(R)}$ mesh with autogeneous bone grafts, ePTFE membrane($Core-tex^{(R)}$ membrane, W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., USA) only, ePTFE membrane with DFDBA or ePTFE membrane with autogeneous bone grafts. For the fluorescent microscopic examination, fluorescent agents were injected at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. Four weeks after surgery, 2 dogs were sacrificed and ePTFE membranes were removed from remaining 2 dogs, which were sacrificed at 12 weeks after surgery. Undecalcified tissues were embedded in methylmethacrylate and $10{\mu}m$ thick sections were cut in a buccolingual direction. These sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin stain and Masson's trichrome stain, and evaluated by descriptive histology and linear measurements. The results were as follows : 1) $Vicryl^{(R)}$ mesh group showed less connective tissue attachment than ePTFE membrane group. 2) The combination of GTR using $Vicryl^{(R)}$ mesh and osseous grafts resulted in new attachment and new bone formation more than GTR using $Vicryl^{(R)}$ mesh only. 3) GTR using ePTFE membrane, with or without osseous grafts, enhanced periodontal regeneration. 4) Root resorption and dentoalveolar ankylosis were observed in the areas treated with the combination of GTR and DFDBA. It was suggested that the effect of adjunctive bone grafting in GTR procedure depends on the materials and the physical properties of barrier membranes. $Vicryl^{(R)}$ mesh performed a barrier function and the use of adjunctive bone grafting may enhance the periodontal regeneration.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.108-118
• /
• 2010

Introduction: Maxillary posterior region, compared to the mandible or maxillary anterior region, has a thin cortical bone layer and is largely composed of cancellous bone, and therefore, it is often difficult to achieve primary stability. In such cases, sinus elevation with bone graft is necessary. Materials and Methods: In this research, 121 patients who had implant placement after bone graft were subjected to a follow-up study of 5 years from the moment of the initial surgery. The total survival rate, 5-year cumulative survival rate and the influence of the following factors on implant survival were evaluated; the condition of the patient (sex, age, general body condition), the site of implant placement, diameter and length of the implant, sinus elevation technique, closure method for osseous window, type of prosthesis and opposing teeth. Results: 1. The 5-year cumulative survival rate of total implants was 90.5%, there was no significant difference between sex, age, the site of implant placement, diameter and length of the implant, sinus elevation technique, and the type of opposing teeth. 2. Patients with diabetes mellitus < osteoporosis and smooth-surfaced machined group < hydroxyapatite (HA)-treated group and homogenous demineralized freeze dried allogenic bone (DFDB) bone graft only group had significantly lower survival rate. 3. With less than 4 mm of residual alveolar ridge height, lateral approach without closing the osseous window resulted in a significantly lower survival rate. 4. Restoration of a single implant showed a significantly lower survival rate, compared to cases where the superstructure was joined with several implants in the area. Conclusion: Patients with diabetes or osteoporosis need longer period of time for osseointegration compared to the normal, and the dentists must be prudent when choosing a surface treatment type and the bone graft material. Also, as the vertical dimension of the residual alveolar ridge can influence the result, staged implant placement should be considered when it seems difficult for the implant to gain primary stability from the residual bone with less than 4 mm of vertical dimension. It is recommended to obdurate the bone window and that the superstructure be connected with several impants in the peripheral area.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.567-577
• /
• 1996

탈회냉동건조골 (DFDBA)과 ePTFE막을 사용한 경우와 ePTFE만을 사용한 경우의 조직유도 재생술의 효과를 관찰하였다 . 12명의 환자에서 12개의 골내낭결손부(한 환자당 하나의 결손부)를 통상적인 치주수술 시행한 경우를 대조군(GFS)으로 , 12명의 환자에서 12개의 결손부는 ePTFE(GTR)막 만으로 , 또 다른 환자의 12개결손부는 ePTFE+DFDBA로 시행하였다. 창상안정과 감염방지를 강조한 술후계획이 사용되었다. 술후 6개월째 임상적 치유상태를 평가 하였다. 대조군에서 치주낭깊이, 부착수준, 탐침골깊이, 치은퇴축의 각각의 평균치는 $3.4{\pm}1.3mm$, $2.0{\pm}1.2mm$, $1.3{\pm}2.0mm$, $-1.7{\pm}0.8mm$, GTR 군에서는 $4.3{\pm}l.3mm$, $3.1{\pm}1.5mm$, $4.2{\pm}2.2mm$, $-11{\pm}1.4mm$ 그리고 GTR+DFDBA 군에서는 $3.4{\pm}2.1mm$, $2.4{\pm}1.9mm$, $2.6{\pm}1.6mm$, $-1.2{\pm}1.7mm$를 보였다. 대조군과 GTR+DFDBA 군의 술전 평균 치주낭깊이는 각각 $6.9{\pm}1.1$, $7.4{\pm}1.2$, $7.0{\pm}2.0mm$였다. GTR, GTR+DFDBA군에서는 뚜렸한 치주낭감소와 부착획득을 보였다(P<0.01). GTR, GTR+DFDBA 에서는 대조군에 비해 탐침골수준의 뚜렷한 향상을 보였으나(P<0.001), GTR 과 GTR+DFDBA 사이에는 뚜렷한 차이가 없었다. 이 실험결과로 골내낭 결손부에서 GTR과 GTR+DFDBA의 사용은 골형성을 제외한 임상결과 에서 대조군과 유사한 결과를 보였다.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.369-379
• /
• 2001

본 연구는 수직적 골결손부에 골이식을 시행한 후 교정력 적용시기에 따른 치주조직의 반응을 알아보고자 시행하였다. 체중 15 kg내외의 성견 9마리에서 상악 좌우측 제 3절치의 원심 치근면에 수직적 골결손을 형성하고 치주질환을 유발시킨 2주 후 치주판막술을 시행하고 골결손 기저부 수준의 치근면에 기준 홈을 형성하였다. 골이식 후 치유기간에 따라 2주군, 4주군, 6주군으로 각각 3마리씩 분류하고 우측 제 3절치는 치주판막술만 하는 비이식측으로, 좌측 제 3절치는 치주판막술과 골이식을 병용한 이식측으로 설정하여 양측 모두 술후 2주, 4주, 또는 6주부터 120 gm의 교정력을 적용하여 8주 동안 치체이동 시킨 후 2주간 보정하였다. 이후 동물을 희생시키고 조직표본을 만든 후 치주조직의 반응을 비교 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 모든 실험동물에서 비이식측에 비해 이식측의 골재생양이 많이 나타났다. 2. 6주군에서는 홈에서 백악-법랑 경계부까지 거리의 1/2이상 치조골과 백악질이 재생되었고 상피의 하방증식없이 결합조직대가 치근면과 부착을 이루었다. 3. 4주군에서는 5주군과 유사한 치주조직 재생소견을 보였으나 그 양은 더 적게 나타났다. 4. 2주군의 경우 골재생이 양측 모두 홈에 한정되어 나타났으며 상피의 하방증식이 홈의 기저부까지 연장되고 백악질과 결합조직의 재생은 관찰되지 않았다. 이상의 결과는 치주질환에 의한 수직적 골결손 환자에서 치주판막술과 골이식을 시행하고 교정적 치아이동을 할 경우 교정력 적용시기에 따른 치주조직의 반응이 차이가 있음을 시사하였다.