• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.233-238
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of immediate or delayed composite resin filling on dentinal microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) after applied the adhesive. The coronal dentin of human third molars was exposed. Single-Bond or One-Step was applied on the dentin surfaces. and composite resin were constructed immediately (group 1) or 5min., 10min., 15min., 20min. and 30min. (groups 2-6) after an adhesive was applied. The specimens were sectioned and made bar-shaped. Each surface area of them was about $1\textrm{mm}^2$. The ${\mu}TBS$ test was performed by EZ test. The results were analysed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 95% significance level. The results suggested that the ${\mu}TBS$ of Single-Bond to dentin was decreased when the composite resin was constructed 20min. and 30min. after Single-Bond was applied. But the ${\mu}TBS$ of One-Step was not affected by delayed composite resin filling.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.93-101
• /
• 1984

The experimental study was made to investigate the effect of the "Heliosit" composite resin on the dental pulp. The 36 class V cavities were prepared on the healthy permanent teeth of 3 days, and were divided into 5 groups and filled with the experimental filling materials. Control group: Zinc Oxide-Eugenol cement filling Experimental groups: Group 1: Dentin Adhesit application & Heliosit filling with or without dycal base Group 2: Heliosit filling with or without dycal base Group 3: Durafill filling with dycal base Group 4: Hipol filling with dycal base Animals were sacrificed after 1 weeks, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks following operation. The teeth were decalcified, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The results obtained form this study were as follows: 1. All experimental group showed slight pulp response. 2. Dentin Adhesit group showed minimal pulp response in both dycal bases and no base cases. 3. In group 2, mild pulp response was found in early stage and repairing process was found as the time elapsed. In no base cases, healing process was delayed slightly. 4. There was little difference in the result among Heliosit group, Durafill group and Hipol group.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제36권5호
• /
• pp.419-424
• /
• 2011

연구목적: 임상에서 주로 사용되는 가봉재가 레진 코팅된 상아질과 레진 인레이간 결합력에 미치는 영향을 밝히고, 지연 상아질 봉쇄법과 즉시 상아질 봉쇄법의 접착에 대한 효과를 비교 평가하고자 본 연구를 시행하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: ZOE로 임시 가봉한 후 상아질 접착제로 지연 상아질 봉쇄법을 이용한 군을 1군, 즉시 상아질 봉쇄법을 이용하고 ZOE로 가봉한 군을 2군, 즉시 상아질 봉쇄법을 이용하고 Dycal로 가봉한 군을 3군, 즉시 상아질 봉쇄법을 이용하고 레진계열의 임시 가봉재로 가봉한 군을 4군으로 분류하였다. 각 그룹에서 가봉재를 제거하고 미리 제작한 레진 인레이를 와동에 합착한 후 근원심으로 절단하여 미세인장 결합 강도를 측정하였다. 결과: 1군에서 가장 낮은 결합력, 4군에서 가장 큰 결합력 나타내었다(p < 0.01). ZOE로 임시 가봉을 한 경우 즉시 상아질 봉쇄법이 지연 상아질 봉쇄법에 비해 결합력이 컸다(p < 0.01). 결론: 레진 인레이의 상아질 접착시 지연 상아질 봉쇄법보다 즉시 상아질 봉쇄법이 권고되며, 레진 계열의 임시 가봉재가 가장 우수한 결과를 보였다.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.243-250
• /
• 2021

Background: Endodontic sealers or their toxic components may become inflamed and lead to delayed wound healing when in direct contact with periapical tissues over an extended period. Moreover, an overfilled sealer can directly interact with adjacent tissues and may cause immediate necrosis or further resorption. Therefore, the treatment outcome conceivably depends on the endodontic sealer's biocompatibility and osteogenic potential. This study aimed to evaluate the cell viability and osteogenic effects of four different sealers in osteoblastic cells. Methods: AH Plus (resin-based sealer), Pulp Canal Sealer EWT (zinc oxide-eugenol sealer), BioRoot RCS (calcium silicate-based sealer), and Well-Root ST (MTA-based calcium silicate sealer) were mixed strictly according to the manufacturer's instructions, and dilutions of sealer extracts (1/2, 1/5 and 1/10) were determined. Cell viability was measured using the water-soluble tetrazolium-8 (WST-8) assay. Differentiation was assessed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralized nodule formation by Alizarin Red S staining. Results: The cell viability of the extracts derived from the sealers excluding Well-Root ST was concentration dependent, with sealer extracts having the least viability at a 1/2 dilution. At sealer extract dilution of 1/10, the test groups showed the same survival rate as that control group, with the exception of BioRoot RCS. Among all experimental groups, BioRoot RCS showed the highest cell viability after 48 hours. The ALP activity was significantly higher in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthemore, all four materials promoted ALP activity and mineralized nodule formation compared to the control at 1/10 dilutions. Conclusion: This is the first study to highlight the differences in biological activity of these four materials. These results suggest that the composition of root canal sealers appears to alter the form of biocompatibility and osteoblastic differentiation.