• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제20권43호
• /
• pp.109-118
• /
• 1997

This paper examined whether strategic decision-making are related to its performance, using a empirical study. Variables of strategic decision-making process were procedural rationality, political behavior, and application of information technology, moderating variable was environmental unstability. The findings suggested that relations between strategic decision-making process and its performance was strongly correlated, but environmental unstability was not moderating for its performance.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.645-654
• /
• 2014

현재 우리나라 일반국도의 포장관리시스템(PMS: Pavement Management System)은 세계은행(World Bank)이 주도한 HDM (Highway Development and Management)-4를 사용하여 유지보수 의사결정의 기초 자료로 사용하고 있으나, 과다한 입력변수와 모형의 불확실성 등으로 인해 국내 실정에 적합한 경제성 분석모형이 필요하게 되었으며, 대부분의 선진국의 경우에는 각 지역과 국가에 맞는 PMS 시스템을 구축하여 운영하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 우리나라 실정에 맞고 효율적인 국도의 도로 및 포장관리를 위한 의사결정시스템을 개발하기 위한 연구로써 시스템 개발에 필요한 구성요소, 공용성 모형 개발, 각 요소별 활용가능한 원단위, 기준 등의 지표 정의 및 종류, 특성들을 분석, 정리하고 경제성 평가를 통해 최적 의사결정을 위한 시스템(S/W) 개발을 목적으로 하였다. 포장관리를 위해 개발한 의사결정시스템의 구성요소는 크게 1)도로, 교통, 사회경제 지표 등의 DB, 2) 도로포장상태의 공용성 모형, 3)도로포장상태에 따른 차량속도변화 모형, 4)경제성 평가 모형, 5) 의사결정지원 시스템으로 구성되며, 개발된 시스템의 검증을 위해 사례 구간을 대상으로 한 분석결과도 함께 제시하였다. 그러나 장래 확률적 특성을 고려한 공용성 모형의 개발과 의사결정을 위한 지표 개발에 대해서는 추가적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국컴퓨터산업학회논문지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2008

본 논문은 의사가 환자에 대해 의료행위를 수행할 때 발생되는 환자의 질병에 대해 최적의 대안을 마련하고 치료를 결정하는 의사결정 방법론을 제시하고자한다. 즉 의사가 환자를 진료 할 때 진료 과정에서 질병에 대한 경험만으로 확진하는 경우가 일반적이다. 이럴 경우 환자의 특성이나 체질을 고려하지 않아 의외의 치료 부작용이 발생될 수 있다. 이러한 문제점을 최소화하기 위해 의학적 의사결정 도구를 이용하게 된다. 따라서 본 논문은 의학적 의사결정 시스템 개념을 정리하고 의사결정에 도움을 주는 여러 도구들(decision-making tools)을 분석해 보고 최적의 진료 의사결정에 도움을 줄 수 있는가에 대해 타당성을 고찰하였다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.213-222
• /
• 2009

Two functions are considerable in the record management of policy management system operation. The first one is to prove that shows the conforming status of the management system requirements. The second one is to prove that shows the performing status whether the policy management system is operating effectively to the company. However, the second function requires the high level data analysis techniques, and it is more important for the decision making of the company operations. That is, the second function is more closer than the first function to the top manager's policy management tool. This paper is prepared to offer a study on the desirable record management which is necessary to the scientific decision making process. The scientific decision making requires the analysis of data derived from the reliable records. It is also aimed to enlighten the relations between the reliability of records and the adoption of the results of analysis in associated with the top manager's decision making.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.121-134
• /
• 2003

To improve the quality of the services and to concentrate on the core capability, in public sector the IT outsourcing is recently being vitalized by the institutional support of the government for the entrusting non-government. Because the lots of general studies so far have simply focused on indicating fragmentary factors i.e. economical factors, risk factors, system factors, or induction objects, etc., they are insufficient in making the practical decisions, therefore we indicated systemized model extending over the whole range of the IT outsourcing to support substantial decision makings, and assorted 4 categories and drew considerable 55 factors from the literature study to materialize the previously considerable factors at each decision making stage. And the principal factors were drawn from each decision making category by a group of 11 experts. Besides, a henceforth plan for the application was also presented through an actual example of the IT outsourcing decision making process of 'M', a public enterprise.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 6th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.620-621
• /
• 2015

In this study, the multi-criteria decision-making model based on Quality Function Deployment Method is proposed. Multicriteria decision-making is an attempt to link QFD method with the TOPSIS. By this effort, a model that makes client's decision-making more rational and objective in design phase is suggested. The multi-criteria decisionmaking model confirming to the Owner's requirements will improve the productivity of the construction industry and the satisfaction of the customer. Further study extending the range of the requirements, not only the Owner's requirement will be necessary to cover the various factors as much as possible. And then, finally as a flexible platform to achieve a sustainable quality management, web-based multi-criteria decision-making model can be utilized by the relevant stakeholders simultaneously with the feed-back and sharing the necessary informations.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.109-122
• /
• 2023

As platforms become primary decision making tools, platforms for decision have been introduced to improve quality of decision results. Because, decision platforms applied augmented decision-making process which uses experiences and feedback of users. This process creates a variety of alternatives tailored for users' abilities and characteristics. However, platform users choose alternatives before considering significant quality factors based on securing decision quality. In real world, platform managers use an algorithm that distorts appropriate alternatives for their commercial benefits. For improving quality of decision-making, preceding researches approach trying to increase rational decision -making ability based on experiences and feedback. In order to overcome bounded rationality, users interact with the machine to approach the optional situation. Differentiated from previous studies, our study focused more on characteristics of users while they use decision platforms. This study investigated the impact of quality factors on decision-making using platforms, the dimensions of systematic factors and user characteristics. Systematic factors such as platform reliability, data quality, and user characteristics such as user abilities and biases were selected, and measuring variables which trust, satisfaction, and loyalty of decision platforms were selected. Based on these quality factors, a structural equation research model was created. A survey was conducted with 391 participants using a 7-point Likert scale. The hypothesis that quality factors affect trust was proved to be valid through path analysis of the structural equation model. The key findings indicate that platform reliability, data quality, user abilities, and biases affect the trust, satisfaction and loyalty. Among the quality factors, group bias of users affects significantly trust of decision platforms. We suggest that quality factors of decision platform consist of experience-based and feedback-based decision-making with the platform's network effect. Through this study, the theories of decision-making are empirically tested and the academic scope of platform-based decision-making has been further developed.

• Journal of Ship and Ocean Technology
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.30-37
• /
• 2001

Ship optimal design is a multi-objective decision-making process and its optimal solution does not exit in general. It is a problem in which the decision-maker is very interested that an effective solution is how to be found which has good characteristic and is substituted for optimal solution in a sense. In the previous methods of multi-objective decision-making, the weighting coefficients are decided from the point of view of individuals which have a bit sub-jective an unilateral behavior. in order to fairly and objectively decide the weighting coeffi-cients, which are considered to be optimal in all system of multi-objective decision-making and satisfactory solution to the decision-maker, the pater presents a method of applying the Technology of the Biggest Entropy. It is proved that the method described in the paper is very feasible and effective be means of a practical example of ship optimal design.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제17권32호
• /
• pp.297-308
• /
• 1994

In the information system, there are many fields that used by decision making support system. Nowadays, the reasons that the need of the decision making system in audit is increased, are as follows. \circled1 The increased of competitiveness in audit environment \circled2 The rapid replenishment of computer hardware and computer system in corporations. The purposes of this study are as follows. \circled1 The connection of Internal management assess results and practical examination. \circled2 In the making of audit opinion, the establish of non-measure and evaluate logic. \circled3 The suggestion of knowledge base structure about the audit task. \circled4 The development of prototype system for the accounting audit expert system. The expected usefulness of accounting audit expert system development are as follows. \circled1 Audit time may be saved \circled2 The consistence of opinion will be increased \circled3 The elevation of audit technique \circled4 The decreased of audit risk \circled5 In the decision making rationlization of accounting information users, it will be proved as usefulness.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2015

A CCTV inspection method has been widely used to assess sewer condition and performance, but Korea lacks a proper decision support system for prioritizing sewer repair and rehabilitation (R&R). The objective of this paper is to introduce the results that we have developed in the Sewer Condition Assessment and Rehabilitation Decision-making (SCARD) Program using MS-EXCEL. The SCARD-Program is based on a standardized defect score for sewer structural and hydraulic assessment. Priorities are ranked based on risk scores, which are calculated by multiplying the sewer severity scores by the environmental impacts. This program is composed of three parts, which are decision-making for sewer condition and performance assessment, decision-making for sewer R&R priority assessment, and decision-making for optimal budget allocation. The SCARD-Program is useful for decision-makers, as it enables them to assess the sewer condition and to prioritize sewer R&R within the limited annual budget. In the future, this program logic will applied to the GIS-based sewer asset management system in local governments.