본 연구의 목적은 사회복지종사자의 공동의존성과 소진의 관계를 살펴보고, 성역할태도가 공동의존성과 소진과의 관계에 조절효과가 있는지 검증하는데 있다. 자료수집은 대전 충청지역의 사회복지종사자 중 2년이상의 경력자를 대상으로 판단표집 하였으며, 총 368부가 분석에 활용되었다. 수집된 자료의 지역별 분포는 대전 139곳, 충청 41곳이었으며, 시설유형별 분포는 생활시설 45곳, 이용시설 135곳으로 이루어졌다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사회복지종사자의 공동의존성은 미약한 수준이 18.8%, 가벼운 수준이 65.2%, 중간수준이 15.8%, 심각한 수준이 .3%로 나타났다. 다음으로 성별과 시설유형에 따른 공동의존성의 수준 차이를 살펴보면 남자와 여자의 전체 공동의존성 수준은 차이가 없게 나타났지만, 공동의존성의 하위영역인 자아숨김에서는 남자가 여자보다 높게 나타났다. 시설유형별 전체 공동의존성 수준은 생활시설 종사자가 이용시설 종사자 보다 높게 나타났으며, 공동의존성의 하위영역인 타인집중 및 자기부정과 자아숨김 영역에서 상대적으로 높게 나타났다. 그리고 공동의존성이 소진에 미치는 영향을 살펴본 결과, 사회복지종사자의 공동의존성은 소진에 유의한 정의 효과를 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 다음으로 성역할태도가 공동의존성과 소진의 관계에서 조절효과가 있는지를 검정해본 결과, 공동의존성과 성역할태도의 상호작용변수는 소진에 유의한 정(+)의 조절효과를 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 살펴보면, 공동의존성의 수준이 증가할수록 전통적 성역할태도 집단은 근대적 성역할태도 집단에 비해 월등하게 높은 수준의 소진을 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 차이는 성역할태도의 유형에 따라 소진의 수준이 달라짐을 보여주는 것으로, 근대적 성역할태도를 지닌 집단이 전통적인 성역할태도를 지닌 집단보다 소진을 보다 유연하게 다루고 있는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 공동의존성과 소진 예방을 통하여 사회복지종사자의 정신건강 증진을 돕고, 효과적인 사회복지 서비스 질 관리를 위한 대책을 제언하였다.
This studies designed to work out a theoretical framework on the experience of sexual abuse from the perspective of grounded theory in an effort to provide more practical and efficient nursing intervention for female victims. The subcategories identified were "sexual abuse", "threatening", "absent mindness", "embarrassment", "horripilation", "dizziness", "wondrousness", "filthiness", "sexual curiosity", "violence level", "victim's age", "neighbors response", "victims personality", "common experience", "sexual abuse information", "family relations", "level of familiarity", "hiding", "suppression", "self-torture", "self-protection", "avoidance", "asking aid", "withdrawal", "hatred", "confusion", "dodging, "remmant", and "pursuing". The 29 subcategories given above were further integrated into 16 categories such as "victimizedness", "being astounded", "filthiness", "degree", "developmental stage", "response pattern", "personality", "rarity", "information availability", "family support", "cover-up", "escaping", "informing", "negative internalization", and "positive pursuit of change". The core categories linked to all the other categories turned out to be "being taken aback" and "filthiness" incorporating the relevant subcategories. A total of 23 theoretical hypothesis emerged in the process of analyzing data. 1. the grater sexual curiosity, the weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthiness. 2. The weaker sexual curiosity, the stronger the senses of being taken aback and filthiness. 3. The stronger the level of violence, The more violent the senses of being taken aback and filthiness. 4. The lower the level of violence, the weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthiness. 5. The younger the victims, the stronger the senses of being taken aback and filthiness. 6. The older the victims, The weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthiness. 7. 'Escaping' will transpire regardless of the given circumstances. 8. The weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthiness, the more probable 'informing' and 'escaping' transpire. 9. The stronger the senses of being taken aback and filthiness, the more probable 'informing' and 'escaping' transpire. 10. The more protective the response from 'informing' and 'escaping' transpire around, the more likely the response to being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'informing' and 'escaping'. 11. The more repelling the response from around, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'. 12. The more open minded the personality of the subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'informing' and 'escaping'. 13. The more closed the personality of tile subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'. 14. The more frequent the experience of sexual abuse, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'informing' and 'escaping'. 15. The less frequent the experience of sexual abuse, the more lilely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'. 16. The more available information concerning sexual abuses, the more likely response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'informing' and 'escaping. 17. The less available information concerning sexual abuses, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'. 18. The more cohesive the family of the subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'informing' and 'escaping'. 19. The less cohesive the family of the subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'. 20. The less familiar the subject is with the abuser, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'informing' and 'escaping'. 21. The less familiar the subject is with the abuser, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping. 22. The more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is 'informing and 'escaping', the more positive changes the subject will pursue. 23. The more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is 'covering-up' and 'escaping', the more negative changes the subject will pursue. The following four hypotheses were conformed in the process of data analysis. 1) In case the level of violence is strong but 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' in weak because of strong sexual curiosity and also if information concerning sexual abuse is not readily available and the frequency is low, negative internationalization marked by 'covering-up' and 'escaping' will take place despite the fact the subject is open-minded, the family is cohesive and the abuser is unfamiliar. 2) In case the level of violence is weak but 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is weak combined with weak sexual curiosity and also if information concerning sexual abuse is readily available and the response from around is protective and the frequency is high, the subject will pursue positive changes to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness', further aided by the fact that the subject is open-minded, the family is cohesive and the abuser is unfamiliar. 3) In case the level of violence is strong and 'being taken abuse' and 'filthiness' is strong because of weak sexual curiosity and also if information concerning sexual abuse is reading available and the response from around is readily available and the response from around is protective and the frequency is low, the subject will persue positive changes marked by 'informing' and 'escaping' despite the fact that the family cohesion is weak and the abuser is familiar. 4) In case the level of violence is strong and 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is strong because of weak sexual curiosity and also if information concerning sexual abuse is not readily available and the response from around is respelling and the frequency is low negative internalization like 'covering-up' and 'escaping' will take place, further aggravated by the fact that the subject's personality is closed, family cohesion is weak, and subject is familiar. On the basis of the above finding, it is recommended that nursing intervention should focus on promoting the milieu conductive to the victims pursuing positive changes along with the adequate aids from protection facilities as well as from the people around them.