• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.64-71
• /
• 2015

This study aims to disclose the dynamics of Daniel Libeskind Museums by the principles of counterbalance. Balance as a dynamic concept is the settlement of instability and tension and to draw overall sense of balance by controlling new perception elements that may cope with the unbalance elements. This is based on balancing compensation and can be explained as a counterbalance. Daniel Libeskind, a representative architect of deconstructivism, creates dynamic space by using oblique lines on the plane. The study was carried out under the assumption that this space would be designed under the certain principles rather than the result of momentary feelings and the analysis was conducted by the counterpoint of music and counterbalance. As a result, Daniel Libeskind balances in a way of forming the mutual right angle by using oblique lines which cancel out the unbalance in plane composition or making the same angle based on vertical / horizontal axis. Counterbalance has been achieved in the section and elevation as well as plane and complex and diverse oblique lines were worked under the constant principle not accidental results. The axes of Daniel Libeskind's architecture have been known to follow contextualism with symbolism and historicity but it was found that a design technique considering counterbalance was used in the overall control.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.33-48
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to analyze the Daniel Libeskind' spatial concept in view of the Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology. After the coming of postmodern architecture, the concept of space ceased to be discussed between architects. Instead a sign and a form were supposed as much more important subject to define architectural discipline. But after 1980, the new concept of architectural space was experimented by the architects like Frank Gehry, Peter Eisenman, Steven Hall, and Bernard Tschumi, which was clearly distinguished from modern spatial concept. By the Daniel Libeskind' architecture, this study are to make clear this tendency. For this, we accept as an important instrument Meleau-Ponty's phenomenology and the spatial concept of Minimalism, which stress the relationship of inter-subjectivity between space and human body. Consequently, Daniel Libeskind' spatial concept is characterized by fragmental, accidental, heterogeneous space by accidental events which is occurred by movement of human, which was indentified with Merleau-Ponty's spatial concept.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제15권12호
• /
• pp.7372-7379
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 다니엘 리베스킨트의 건축을 대상으로 건축물 내 외부에서 지각되는 공간감과 시각적으로 인지되는 외형적 특성을 분석함으로써 리베스킨트 건축의 경관적 특성을 살펴보고자 하였다. 분석결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 다니엘 리베스킨트는 '느껴지는 공간'을 통해 과거의 흔적, 형태적 모순 등을 계획하였고, 다이나믹한 공간과 더불어 불안정한 긴장감을 유발시켰다. 특히, 그는 공간과 시간 사이의 벽을 허물어 그 간격을 모호하게 함으로써 이용자가 보는 것뿐만 아니라 느낄 수 있는 지각적 공간 차원의 경관을 만들고 있다. 다시 말해, 리베스킨트 건축은 과거 역사적 사건을 현대인들이 직간접적으로 체험하고 느낄 수 있는 지각적 공간으로서의 경관으로 이해된다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.30-37
• /
• 2004

Architect Daniel Libeskind made peculiar works with ‘Jewish Museum’ in Berlin as a momentum in 1989. The concern was concentrated after Libeskind was selected ultimately to the designer of ‘Design for the World Trade Center site’ in February 2003. Especially his works which have been recently accomplished are not the deconstructivism were recognized as unreal drawings and simple studies but they are professing his own peculiar architectural thought. However meanwhile researches about Libeskind have been processed in an architect viewpoint of a deconstructivism tendency, lack of researches to be more various point of view. This study fundamentally is sharing the source with Libeskind's basic idea, as a deconstructivism architect, but not to understand essential concept of decorstructivism which has the philosophy grasps of essence of an object, reconstrues contradiction that the human is simple to prescribe by the language and tries to express in new architectural formative volition. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to grasp of Libeskind's own architectural thought of the essence, consider background becomes the foundation of the architectural thought and peculiarity of the architectural representation.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.89-99
• /
• 2013

The comtemporary architecture has not an discourse on form and representative style, but a new architectural concept of the generative process through the various relationship of the urban context, the continuity of the time and the experience of the people. This architectureal concepts make new and various architectural attempts to have a virtuality. The viruality is a reality to coexist with the present in contemporary philosophy. Daniel libeskind makes various arhcitectural experimentative attempts to reveal his virtuality through his memory as the Jews and his unconscious virtuality. The 'line' has the connotation of architectural reality and virtuality. Every line drawn becomes architectural form for example, walls, windows and makes spaces, and reveal a boundary as a connection. Architecture's visibility understates and structures its invisible aspect, so that the visible and the invisible make the architecture together. Daniel libeskind maks the virtual lines having the invisible of unconsious, time, and place. He no longer divide the form of architecture, its spatiality from all the implications which it adresses beyond its own particular built time and place and public unconsious mind. He demands the 'virtual line' that remembers distress and the past and reveal the virtuality of time and place. The virtual line is the sentimental communication of architecture.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.7-16
• /
• 2015

It is not easy to clarify the historical perspective of architect through his architecture. Exceptional cases, it will be the time to design a history museum. As an institution, a Museum already became an apparatus to represent the history to it itself. Libeskind's Jewish museum Berlin has been presented as the controversial case most of all. In particular, in that it instead of dealing with history positive, that contains a tragic history, this building is a building that history a unique interpretation of the architect has been a problem. Therefore, it is difficult to find a suitable example to Libeskind's Jewish museum in Berlin to try and look at the problem of the history of contemporary history and interpretation of the architect. In this paper, I am trying to interpret Libeskind's Jewish Museum Berlin through the aesthetics and history philosophy of Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin. They are Jewish and the central figures of the Frankfurt School, known as 'critical theorists'. Their critical theory was formed based on the experience of the Jewish genocide and war.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.347-358
• /
• 2002

건축드로잉이 미래의 지어질 건축을 예상하기 위해 필요한 단순히 기능적인 그래픽이라는 전통적인 개념에서 변화하고 있다. 특히 해체주의 건축가들 사이에서 개성적인 그래픽 요소들은 그들의 자기표현적인 스타일을 실현시키는데 큰 기여를 하고 있다. 오로지 미학적인 이유에서 그래픽이 필요한 경우가 있는 반면에 몇몇 경우는 드로잉이라는 작업 자체가 보다 근본적인 자기탐구과정의 성격을 갖기도 한다. 다니엘 리베스킨트의 건축드로잉이 그러한 경우로서 타이포그래피적 성격은 그의 작업의 큰 특징을 이룬다. 타이포그래피적 요소를 그의 드로잉 전반에 걸쳐서 추상적 상징주의 표현의 메티포로서 즐겨 사용함으로써 보다 본격적인 타이포그래피적 접근을 가능성을 제기한다. 이러한 맥락에서 본 연구는 타이포그래피 요소들이 어떻게 그의 건축드로잉에서 해석될 수 있는가에 주목하고 어떤 상호연관성이 이질적인 두 영역 사이에 개입되는지, 또한 보조적 수단으로서가 아닌 적극적인 역할로서 그의 실제 건축에 반영되는강에 대해서 분석하고자 한다. 더불어 활자 그 자체가 서로 다른 매체를 만나서 상징화 과정이 부여되는 유형적 분류들을 통해서 리베스킨트 건축드로잉의 해석에 대한 다양한 가능성을 제기하고자 한다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2012

Today, museum exhibition can be divided into two sub-categories: a. informative exhibition with various useful auxiliary media to convey knowledge and b. appreciative exhibition considering aesthetic conveyance and visual/perceptual environment. In addition to this, the concept of memorial exhibition as a field that tangible and intangible memories are transmitted and reproduced is creating another genre of exhibition. As an example of such a memorial exhibition above, the work of de-constructive architect Daniel Libeskind was selected. Jewish Museum and Imperial War Museum North both of which maximized the exhibition space by grafting architectural language to exhibition narrative were analyzed and compared to see if the same architectural language can be displayed differently in another form of exhibition after being drawn into the exhibition space depending on the changes in time and perspective. Therefore, in the narrative display combining the selection of exhibition contents and storytelling, the formative language of space can confirm that exhibition narrative as an ending structure changed into a retelling story with more extended meanings through interactive factors. Eventually, in this formative narrative, when the display of historical facts and exhibition themes is combined with the architectural language in an exhibition hall according to the approach direction, the memorial exhibition can create a formative language stimulating sensibility in the memories of space and a differentiated formative exhibition space where one is truly moved by oneness of contents.

• 한국실내디자인학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국실내디자인학회 2007년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.270-274
• /
• 2007

Clearing trace of symbol which was gone with a series of pre-modern architecture history since the modern architecture (pursuing true nature from tradition which is repeated and imitated unconsciously). That is, What is the course of deconstruction? In the early part of the 20th century, We still accept the necessity of decoration in spite of its existence at one time being threaten. This means, even though symbolism in architecture has relative importance by situation of Times, it plays an important role to add the past to current style through 'Symbol'. The history of Times, a carrier which reflects Present on New Futures, makes memory by gathering data but we can not amplify our historical imagination with only data. Data is a past memory and evidence but we can not substitute that for historical experience. And it is difficult for future generations who don't live through that history to change their historical recognition with recollecting memories. They have to draw history with data but it is very limited in itself. However, They can collect historical memory through symbol in architecture. In this study, We pay attention to the symbolism of a memorial hall architecture. So We'll analyze dichotomy concept of Barthes's signifiant and signifie, visual sign and course of symbolic meaning on basis of Daniel Libeskind's Jewish Museum.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.793-800
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 다니엘 리베스킨트 건축작품을 분석함에 있어 어린 시절 습득하였던 일련의 음악 작업과 오페라 아론과 모세에 대한 영향을 고찰하여 리베스킨트 건축과의 상관성을 분석하고자 하였다. 그 분석의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 리베스킨트는 악보 위에서 자유롭게 흘러다니는 음계들의 구성을 그의 건축에 차용하여 보이지 않는 선들의 집합을 만들어냈다. 둘째, 음악구조에서의 2중 선율, 즉 다성음악적 비례 형태를 바탕으로 리베스킨트는 대위법(countepoint)적 중첩의 기하학적 형태를 구성하였다. 또한, 건축과 음악과의 상호 텍스트적 결합의 결과로서 재료, 형태 등의 대비를 계획하여 하이브리드(hybrid) 즉, 다차원적인 공간구성을 계획하여 기하학적이면서도 자유로운 선적 리듬을 표현하였다. 셋째, 리베스킨트는 과거의 아픔, 공포, 불안감 등을 공간적으로 나타내고자 노력하였으며 아놀드 쉰베르크의 작품에서의 영감을 통해 그의 작업에서 부재의 공간을 구축하였다.