• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.562-572
• /
• 2020

This study analyzed subjectivity of underachievers on Peer Assisted Learning(PAS) in culinary skills related subject for providing better educational environment through consideration of educational efficiency of particular teaching method. Q Methodology was employed for analysing of responses of a small group of the students. The research found that three types of distinctive structures of responses of the students' subjectivity. The first one was Increase learning effectiveness type(Type1, N=8), the second one was Development of lesson materials for passive students(Type2, N=8), and the last one was Practical self-directed learning needs development(Type3, N=6). From the result, PAS was an effective teaching method for underachievers for encouraging participation of study program, helping to rise self-confidence in subject's tasks, and awareness of self directed learning and additional study on subjects matters. The study, however, found that students could consider themselves as an interruption to other students' study progress, and could feel other students' awareness as a burden. At last, forming a class by deeper consideration on the learning levels of each students and providing additional educational contents for encouraging self directed learning are necessary for the better efficiency for the future.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.5
• /
• pp.327-337
• /
• 2020

This study analyzed subjective cognitive types of culinary majors by applying TBL of cooking practice subjects, and applied Q methodology to multifaceted analysis of subjective cognitive types of learners. For the analysis of the study, interviews were conducted for college students majoring in cooking, and the survey was conducted in the order of constructing the Q population, selecting P-samples, classifying Q, interpreting the results, conclusions, and discussion. A total of four types were derived from the type analysis, and each was named according to its specificity as follows. Type 1 (N = 8): Cooperative Learning Effect Types, Type 2 (N = 8): Problem Solving Ability Effect Types, Type 3 (N = 6): Self Directed Learning Effect Type, Type 4 (N = 6): Individual Practice Preference Type analyzed for each unique feature type. It is expected that through the results of the study, it is expected to provide important implications that can help in the study of similar teaching methods in the future by fostering talents who can increase the needs of the industry and social stress.