• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.210-227
• /
• 2006

Many historians presume that several kings included the crown prince were killed by poison in the Jo-Soon dynasty. Above all, there is every possibility of killing the crown prince So-Hyoon(昭顯) by poison. The crown prince So-Hyeon was detained for 8 years in Sim-Yang(瀋陽). He died suddenly in two month from coming home. According to an authentic record, official death causes were malaria. But there is little possibility that a young crown prince die of malaria at the age of 34. His dead body shows change of skin color and bleeding from the ear, eye, mouth, and nose. This is the sufficient evidence that he was killed by poison. King In-Jo have a doubt that he was ousted from his post by crown prince So-Hyeon in conspiracy with cheong imperial court. Especially, after the crown prince So-Hyeon's death, owing to cold attitude that king In-Jo shows and a tragic affair that occurred to the crown prince's family, king In-Jo is under suspicion as the mastermind of the murder. Another poisoners are Jo-So Yong(趙昭容) and Lee-Hyeong Ik(李聲益). Jo-So Yong, a royal harem, intrigue against the couple of crown prince So-Hyoon. Lee-Hyeong Ik that win king In-Jo's favor take charge of the medical treatment. We supposed that toxic substance is arsenic poison.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.58-71
• /
• 2009

1. Objectives : The Crown Prince Sohyen(1612-1645) has been believed ro have been poisoned to death because of the political conflict with the King Injo. However, the Crown Prince Sohyen who was So-yangin(SY type) didn't be treated properly at that time. This paper is supposed to explain the reason why he died by reference. 2. Methods : The prescription which was made out to the Crown Prince Sohyen is analyzed, based on the Sasang Constitutional Medicine(SCM) through Shimyang-ilgy and Ulyudongkung-ilgy. 3. Results : 1) In the case of the prescription where So-yang medical stuffs were contained a lot or Gunyak(the main madical stuff) was So-yang one, the Crown Prince Sohyen was better, while that of Tae-eum and So-eum medical stuffs didn't work. Therefore, the Crown Prince Sohyen can be considered So-yangin. 2) The So-yang in's symptom was misunderstood as Hakjil and treated, which could lead him to be put to death 4. Conclusions : The Crown Prince Sohyen is supposed to be Soyang-in(SY type), and accordingly the So-yang in's symptom was misunderstood as Hakjil and treated, which could cause him to pass away.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 2020

The planning acumen led by the crown prince stands out during the banquets that were held continually during the reign of Crown Prince Hyomyung around the late Joseon period from 1827 to 1929. If we examine the changes in banquet space during the period that Crown Prince Hyomyung ruled by proxy, the Jagyeongjeon(慈慶殿) in Changgyeonggung Palace, which was built during the time of King Jeongjo was repaired after the in 1827 during the reign of the crown prince and appeared in its changed form in Muja Jinjakin 1828. It is believed that the Jagyeongjeonwas expanded and repaired during the reign of Crown Prince Hyomyung to conduct banquets for important guests. Jagyeongjeon which was repaired during the crown prince's reign, is a space where banquets were continuously held during the three years that he reigned, and we can see that it is an important space for royalty where the authority of King Sunjo, Queen Sunwon, and Crown Prince Hyomyung was reflected. Yeongyeongdan(演慶堂) was a structure built in 1828, which is after the period when the Jagyeongjeonwas changed in 1827, and it is a space that emerged during the reign of the crown prince. Hwanchwijeong(環翠亭), which was constructed during the time of King Seongjong was changed after 1827 during the reign of Crown Prince Hyomyung and appeared in its changed form in Muja Jinjakin 1828. Hwanchwijeongwas the place where the Crown Prince Hyomyung stayed and planned banquets and it was repaired along with Jagyeongjeonin 1827. During his reign, the political intent of the crown prince was reflected not in superficial political spaces but in spaces where banquets were held and accordingly the main spaces for banquets and their related royal palace locations were changed or newly established. You need to briefly explain what this and Muja Jinjak are. New information is not provided in this paragraph. You have already established why the crown prince renovated the banquets and its significance in the first two paragraphs. You could just add "Jagyeongjeon(慈慶殿), Yeongyeongdan(演慶堂), and Hwanchwijeong(環翠亭) in Changgyeonggung Palace during his reign were changed and renovated during the time when the royal banquets of the 19th century were getting established. It was spaces that reflected the royal family and royal authority" to the end of the second paragraph and it would convey your intended meaning.

• 복식문화연구
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.185-200
• /
• 1998

The eldest son of the crown prince is very important social status next to the crown prince deciding fundamentals of a state in Chosun dynasty which laying stress royal authority. Accordingly, Chakbong(冊封) of the eldest son of the crown prince has been done independently like as Chakrei(冊禮) of the crown prince. The existig record of Chakrei(冊禮) of the eldest son of the crown prince. The existing record of Charkrei(冊禮) of the eldest son of the crown prince are Hyunjongwangseon(顯宗王世孫), Euisoseson(懿昭世孫), Youngjowangseson(英祖王世孫), Hungjongwangseson(憲宗王世孫) of 4 books for Chakreidogameuigue(冊禮都監儀軌) being preserved in Kyujangkak(奎章閣). The transition of classified clothes are stated on Wangse sonchakreidogameuiguebanchado(王世孫冊禮都監儀軌班次圖) for Chakrei(冊禮) of the eldest son of the crown prince. Its details are as below. Finally, there is no changes in constitution of the costume of the eldest son of the crown prince Chakrei(冊禮) called as Ssanggodong(雙童髮)·Gongjungchak(空頂 )·Ojangbok(五章服) on documentary records depsitefo no explanation of Banchado(班次圖). Secondly, The classified clothes of the eldes sion of the crown prince Hcakreibanchado(冊禮班次圖) are on . We have acknowledged that Kwanmo(冠帽) of Dangbukwanwon(堂部官院) has been changed from Heugrib(黑笠) to Samo(紗帽) since Youngjowangseson(英祖王世孫), Euibok(衣服) from Chungpo(靑袍) to Nokdanryung(綠團領), the costume of Euijangsu(儀仗手) from Chunggun(靑巾) to Whangchorib(黃草笠) and changed again to Hongpimoja(紅皮帽子), Chungeui(靑衣) changed to Hongeui(紅衣). Also we know that Kwanmo(冠帽) of Kyogun(轎軍) has been changed to Pimoja(皮帽子) with high top, Chungeui(靑衣) changed to Hongeui(紅衣). The costume of Byulgam(別監) has been changed from Nokgun(綠巾) to Jogun( 巾), Nokpo(綠袍) changed to Pimoja(皮帽子) with high top, Chungeui(靑衣) changed to Hongeui(紅衣). The costume of Byulgam(別監) has been changed from Nokgun(綠巾) to Jogun( 巾), Nokpo(綠袍) changed to Hongpo(紅袍), that of Suri(書吏) changed from Chungeui(靑衣) to Huekeui(黑衣). Accordingly, the transition of costume color to red stands for the briliance. Thirdly, regarding the constitution of the eldest son of the crown prince Chakrei(冊禮), that of Euisoseson(懿昭世孫) & Youngjowangseson(英祖王世孫) are same for Unggolta(態骨朶), Youngjagi(令字旗), Keumdungja(金 子), Eundungja(銀 子), Mojul( 節), Jaksun(雀扇), Chungkae(靑蓋), Chungyangsol(靑陽率). In case of Hunjongseson(懿昭世孫), Baktakgi(白澤旗) is added. On Youngjowangseson(英祖王世孫), Chungilsol(靑日率) and Kiringi(麒麟旗) are added. However, we know that the constitution of the eldestson of the crown prince Hunjong(憲宗) Chakrei(冊禮) is quite different that of previous constitution. i.e. : Hongae(紅蓋), Baktakgi(白澤旗), Samkaggi(三角旗), Kagdangi(角端旗), Byukbonggi(碧鳳旗), Jujakgi(朱雀旗), Kuemdungja(金 子), Eundungja(銀 子), Eunribgwa(銀立瓜), Kuemhwanggwa(金 瓜), Eunhwhanggwa(銀 瓜), Kuemwolbu(金鉞斧), Bongsun(鳳扇), Huegkae(黑蓋). Also the kinds of Eujanggi(儀仗旗) are various which are similar to the constitution of The Crown Prince(世子) Chakrei(冊禮).

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.188-207
• /
• 2013

본 연구에서는 1817년에 거행된 효명세자의 입학례 의주(儀註)와 절차별 장면을 담은 국립문화재연구소 소장본 ${\ll}$왕세자입학도${\gg}$를 중심으로, 입학례 절차에 따라 왕세자가 착용하는 복식의 종류와 구성에 대하여 살펴보았다. 입학례를 구성하는 첫 번째 절차인 <출궁의(出宮儀)>는 산선시위를 비롯하여 세자시강원과 세자익위사 관원들, 그리고 의장군들이 왕세자와 함께 동궁을 출발하여 성균관을 향하는 절차이다. 산선시위를 비롯하여 세자시강원과 세자익위사 관원들이 동행하고, 이 대열 앞에 의장군이 앞장서 출궁을 알린다. 이때 왕세자는 서연복(書筵服)을 착용하였다. 서연복은 익선관(翼善冠)과 곤룡포(袞龍袍), 독옥대(禿玉帶), 흑화(黑靴)로 구성된다. 그러나 입학례 당시 효명세자는 아직 관례를 치르지 않은 상태였으므로 익선관 대신 쌍동계(雙童?)라는 머리모양에 쌍옥도(雙玉導)를 꽂는 공정책(空頂?)을 썼다. 곤룡포는 다홍색 안감을 넣은 아청색 혹은 자적색 곤룡포를 착용하고, 허리에는 청정(靑?) 독옥대를 띠며 청색 또는 흑색 깃 장식의 흑피화를 신었다. 성균관에 이르면 <작헌의(酌獻儀)>, <왕복의(往復儀)>, <수폐의(脩弊儀)>, <입학의(入學儀)>를 치르게 되는데, 그동안 줄곧 학생복인 청금복(靑衿服)을 착용하였다. 왕세자는 학생복으로 연두건(軟頭巾)을 머리에 쓰고 아청색 도포를 입고 자적색 세조대, 흑화를 착용하였다. 도포 안에는 대창의와 중치막을 받쳐 입었다. 왕세자가 성균관에서 학생복을 착용하는 것은 왕세자가 왕위 계승자로서의 서열을 내세우는 자리가 아니라, 학문의 스승을 맞이하고 유학의 학맥을 잇는 자임을 표방하는 자리이기 때문이다. 성균관에서 의식을 마치고 궁으로 돌아온 후, 효명세자는 창경궁의 시민당(時敏堂)에서 입학례의 마지막 절차인 <수하의(受賀儀)>를 거행하였다. 이때 원유관복(遠遊冠服)을 착용한다고 하였으나 관례를 치르기 전이므로 원유관 대신 공정책을 사용하였다.

• 복식
• /
• 제59권10호
• /
• pp.68-84
• /
• 2009

A state wedding ceremony of kings and crown princes in the Chosun Dynasty was systemically formalized in a book Five National Ceremonies (1474) as one of the five major formal events of the royal auspicious ceremonies(Ga-rae). For a state wedding, Ga-rae Protocol was made by a devision for Ga-rae temporarily established for the occasion. A total number of auspicious ceremony protocols of kings and crown princes amounts to 20 in the span of 279 years. Among the proposals, the wedding of Soon-jong in the Imo Year of 1882 is described most thoroughly. Nap-bin-ui(reception of bride) comprises six rituals which are nap-chae, nap-jing, go-gyi, chaek-bin, chin-young, and dong-ryae. A grand formal costume of the crown prince is granted based on the 'Seven Parts Formal Costume' of the first year of the king Moon-jong in 1450 together with an official costume for crown prince(Gon-myeon-chil-jang) arranged in the third year of the king Young-rak. In the royal palace of the Chosun Dynasty, the granted formal costume of the crown prince is officially recorded as a code and presented in a Gwon-ji-il section of the Formalities of the Five National Ceremonies. The formal costume and its accessory set for the crown prince recorded as a code are described in Sangbang Jeong-ryae as the formal costume of the crown prince section published by the king's request at the high senate commission in the 28th year of the king Young-jo in 1752. The aim of the study is to investigate the formal costume of the crown prince as an auspicious ceremonial costume worn at the wedding in the year of Imo.

• 복식
• /
• 제28권
• /
• pp.169-186
• /
• 1996

Wangeja Chulgungdo (The Painting for a Crown Prince's Outgoing for Schooling to Sungkyunkwan) for this study which is held by the Korean university Museum is a kind of documentary paintings which not only have the value of art history but also give a glimpse of the court ceremonies for a Crown Prince. This painting offers various historical clues to understand the procedure for a Crown Prince's official entrance of Sungkyunkwan participants of the ceremony and other ceremony-related items$\ulcorner$Wangseja chulgungdo$\lrcorner$ was the painting drawn for a series of court procedures of Crown Prince Munjo's official en-trance of Sungkynkwan. When he was old enough to begin learning Sohak on March 11. 1817 that is ; he held Heonjakrye(a ceremony for offering drinks to the ancestors) at Munmyo passed Iphakye(a ceremony for en-trance of school) at Myungryundang and received Suharye the next day. $\ulcorner$Wangseja Chulgungdo$\lrcorner$ had the strong char-acteristics of documentary paintings in terms of art history which was intended to leave the historical event of a Crown Prince's entrance. It reflected the traits of documentary painting style in late Chosun Dynasty; a technique that strongly relieved the ceremonial scenes against the background such as mountains and rivers; a painting that not only captured the vivid actions of personalities ar the crucial moment of the ceremony but also depicted the cer-emonial vessels and items very realistically. Authors could confirm the ceremonial think-ing of the traditional society through a Crown Prince's entrance which controlled the details of every part of the performances of the court ceremony.

• 복식
• /
• 제31권
• /
• pp.47-60
• /
• 1997

As we analyzed the formalities of court dress during King Soonjo's rule through the characters depicted in $\boxDr$Wangseja Chulgungdo$\boxUl$(The Painting for a Crown Prince's Outgoing for Schooling to Sungkyunkwan) the results were as follows: People wore their appropriate full dress ac-cording to the ceremonial procedures. In the case of a Crown Prince normally the wore Gongjungchaek(a hat) (after the coming-of-age ceremony Iksunkwan) and Gonryongpo(imperial clothes) to show his status as a Crown Prince. He wore chugkumbok(a Coat) to indicate a Crown Prince as being a student. on an occasion of celebration a Crown Prince wore Wonyugwan and Gangsapo to provide him with prestige and as a sign of respect for the occasion. The teacher of a Crown Prince also wore Gongbok and Sangbok accoding to the dress requirements of the ceremonies. We can confirm that the Gongbok system of all government officials had been main-tained in the late Chosun dynasty. We know that the form of ceremonies be-came simplified in the late Chosun dynasty. it was recorded that students had to wear Chungkumbok. but we knew from the painting that students actually wore Dopo(a traditonal korean coat). We knew through this painting that the court dress rules of the late Chosun dynasty varied that previously known. As we concluded above research on the his-tory of costume by analyzing paintings both supplements our knowledge of the topic and confirms the deficiency in the study of the his-tory of costume based solely upon literature and books.

• 복식
• /
• 제35권
• /
• pp.265-279
• /
• 1997

Through eight folding screens for Chac Rae and ban Cha Do we have learned the costumes of people who participate in Chac Rae ceremonty being accompanied by social positions. Firstly the costumes of crown prince can be classified in two parts. One is costumes of Chac Rae befor Kwan Rae the other is costumes of Chac Rae after Kwan Rae Also we know the costumes of Chac Rae before kwan Rae is consisted of SSangdonggae Gong-jungchak Chilchangbok Mean-while the crown prince wore Myunbok at chac rae after Kwan rae. Second Chakbongdo tell us various types of Youngbok by blue-black and red colored chulik Third we can see Uijangsu who wore Sangbok on Chakbongdo and know their brilliant costume colors on ban Cha Do through Hongmo on Chunguei Chungmo on honguei Hongmo on Honguei violet-Lip on honguei mean-while Kyokun wears Hongmo on Honguei and hoimo on Hoiuei. Forth regarding the costume of Byulgam Chakbongdo appears Chogun on Hongpo belting blue belt wearing blackboots Meantime ban Cha Do shows Chogun on Hongpo wearing shoes. As reviewed above we know various color and types of costumes through Chakbongdo & Ban Cha Do on Crown prince Chacraedogam and would lide to deepen Chac Rae of crown prince including the costumes of Chac Rae of the crown princess the eldest son of the crown price the eldest brother of the king.

• 미술자료
• /
• 제97권
• /
• pp.69-86
• /
• 2020

국립중앙박물관 소장 <행행일기(幸行日記)>(구7152, 이하 <일기>로 약칭)는 1761년 4월 사도세자의 평양밀행을 기록한 문서이다. 당시 작성자는 평양의 하급 군관 함대일(咸戴一)(1738~1771)이며, 사도세자에게 능력을 인정받아 4월 7일부터 5월 1일까지 세자를 모셨다. <일기>는 해당 시기 구체적인 행적을 적고 있어, 역사에 기록되지 않았던 사도세자의 평양밀행 여정을 확인할 수 있다. <일기>는 다른 일기들과 구분되는 특징을 가지고 있다. 사용된 종이의 품질과 정연하게 쓰인 서체와 문장의 구성은 일반적인 일기와는 다르다. 이 <일기>는 개인이 쓴 일기와는 달리 완성된 문서에 가까운 형식을 갖추었다. <일기>는 그동안 모호하게 알려졌던 사도세자의 평양밀행을 기록한 만큼 내용 사실 여부를 우선 확인할 필요가 있다. 이를 위한 과정으로 먼저 함대일이라는 인물을 추적하였는데, 그의 가계(家系)는 <일기>에서 밝히고 있는 내용과 일치하였다. 또한 <일기>에서 사도세자가 글씨를 쓴 정황이 나오는데, 당시 쓴 예필진적(睿筆眞跡)이 오늘날에도 전해지고 있다. 따라서 <일기>에 실린 내용을 사실로 볼 수 있다. 그러나 밀행 당시 사도세자는 다양한 계층의 인물들을 만났지만, <일기>는 함대일과 사도세자 중심으로만 구성되어있다. 이 점은 당시에 원문에 해당하는 기록이 존재할 수 있으나, 오늘날 전해지는 <일기>는 이를 바탕으로 편집하였을 가능성을 보여준다. <일기>는 함대일의 아들 함정희(咸正禧)(1758~1817)에 의해 완성된 것으로 보인다. 먼저 부친 함대일이 영조(英祖)(재위 1724~1776) 재위 기간에는 사도세자와 관련된 기록을 남겼을 가능성이 낮다. 둘째로 정조 대 함정희가 사도세자의 예필과 일기를 바친 정황이 확인된다. 물론 당시 정조에게 바친 일기가 현재의 <일기>인지 여부는 불분명하다. 그러나 정조(正祖)(재위 1776~1800)의 주도로 사도세자 현창 사업이 진행된 시대적 상황을 고려하면 당시에 제작되었을 가능성은 충분하다. 그리고 예필과 일기를 바친 시기는 각각 현륭원 조성과 사도세자의 환갑과도 겹치는 점이 확인된다. 따라서 <일기>는 함정희가 본인의 입신(立身)을 위해 제작하였음을 짐작해볼 수 있다.