• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.74-82
• /
• 2011

In order to enhance the aviation industry in Korea, many strategies have been published by some researchers as well as the government. However, considering the constrained conditions in real, since the ranking of their importance has not determined yet, they are difficult to be implemented by decision makers. Therefore, in terms of their demand for deciding the significance of strategies, the evaluation model of this paper was developed. In this study, the Cross-impact Hierarchy Process(CHP), an linked model of both the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Cross Impact Analysis(CIA), was selected as the best model. That is because the strategies are not independent from each other, and one strategy can affect the others depending on its realization, which can be considered in CHP. To achieve our objective, at first, the strategies were categorized and arranged according to the evaluation structure. Secondly, the parameters such as conditional probability and weights were estimated from the survey conducted by 16 experts in the aviation field. Lastly, the result of the assessment were discussed, and further studies were suggested.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2002

The objective of this paper is to develop a new priority setting algorithm that considers the cross-impact of the future technology alternatives and that satisfies the final goal of the technology management through multi-hierarchy evaluation criteria. By combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model, which is a well-known priority setting model, and Cross Impact Analysis (CIA) model, which is a technological forecasting method that considers cross-impact among R&D Items, we developed an Integrated Cross-Impact Hierarchical (CIH) model, which sets the priority by considering technological forecasting and technology dependency simultaneously. A step-by-step numerical example of the model developed here is presented as backup of its practicality.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2000년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.259-262
• /
• 2000

The Cross-impact Hierarchy Process (CHP), an extended model of the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) which is linked to Cross Impact Analysis(CIA), is a powerful decision making tool to assist in the ranking of large number of dependent technological alternatives. In this paper, we will describe an application of the CHP to the aerospace industry. We here conducted a questionnaire survey for S company that is one of the representative aerospace companies in Korea. A questionnaire was designed to obtain both the priority with dependence (the CHP priority) and the priority with independence (the AHP priority) in order to compare the priority derived by each of two methods. The hierarchy in this case study is concerned with priority setting for R&D area to ensure dependent aerospace design technology of the company, The result shows that there exists the difference hard to neglect between the final priorities gained by two methods.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2001년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.242-245
• /
• 2001

This study is aimed to design a priority setting algorithm necessary for evaluating and selecting interdependent R&D planning system alternatives. In case that the relationship of technology alternatives is interdependent, a relative importance as occurrence or nonoccurrence of the technology alternatives viewed from the future time varies. So, we are subject to design the evaluation process considering a cross- impact of future technology alternatives. Thus, we apply the cross impact analysis (CIA) model to consider the cross-impact among interdependent system alternatives. Also, the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) model is applied to determine the priority of alternatives by taking the pair-wise comparison among factors.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 2000년도 춘계공동학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.122-125
• /
• 2000

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision making model, which is more applicable than other methods to R&D project selection, particularly when it is applied to intangibles. The objective of this paper is to develop an extended model of the AHP which Is linked to Cross Impact Analysis to assist in the ranking of a large number of technological alternatives. In this study, we developed a priority setting algorithm which considers the cross-impact of the future technology alternatives and thus developed an integrated cross-impact hierarchical decision-making model, which sets the priority by considering technological forecasting and technology dependency

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.13-26
• /
• 2018

The restoration of the impaired stream ecosystem is an important part of river policies in Ministry of Environment (MoE). However, the diagnosing the impairment sources of stream ecosystem has been omitted on the current river projects and policies. This phenomena lead the remaining impairment sources keep influencing on negative effects on streams. Hence, it is critical to construct a diagnosis system of impairment sources in order to increase the efficiency of various river restoration projects and policies. Moreover, it is also important to understand the relative impact of socio-economic factors of the impairment of stream ecosystems so as to build a domestic diagnosis system in place. Therefore, the study aims to analyse the relative effects of socio-economic factors which are the source of the stream ecosystem impairments through implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In order to achieve the goal, a list of socio-economic factors influencing the stream health has been derived. On the basis of the derived causes list, AHP questionnaire were carried out to the experts of aquatic ecology. The study results could be implemented to analysing the relative influence of socio-economic impairment causes in domestic stream environments. In addition, more case study investigation is needed to cross-check if the derived impairment causes and weights are applied in the field as well as to develop more reliable indicators.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.53-76
• /
• 2005

복잡성(complexity)은 신제품개발 과정에서 프로젝트 팀이 빈번하게 당면하는 개발과제의 주요 속성으로 이에 대한 적절한 대처 여부는 신제품개발의 성과에 적지 않은 영향을 미친다. 복잡성이란 속성이 신제품개발의 관리에서 주목 받게 된 배경으로는, 우선 제품개발과정에서 당면하는 복잡성이 증가 추세에 있다는 점을 들 수 있다. 새로운 기술과 공법 그리고 소재의 등장, 복합 제품의 개발(예: 디지털 컨버전스), 또한 기업간 제휴를 통한 개발은 신제품개발의 복잡성 증대와 관련이 된다. 한편 신제품개발의 복잡성에 대한 미흡한 대처는 개발과정의 지연, 개발비용의 예산 초과, 제품개발의 포기 등과 같은 부정적 결과를 초래한다. 이와 같이 복잡성의 증대 추세 및 복잡성으로 인한 적지 않은 영향력을 고려해볼 때, 신제품개발 과정에서 당면하는 복잡성에 대한 연구의 필요성은 증대된다. 그러나 아직까지 복잡성에 대한 연구는 현실적 필요성에 비해 상대적으로 적은 관심만이 기울여져 왔다. 본 고에서는 신제품개발 과정에서 당면하는 복잡성에 대한 주요 연구과제들을 살펴보는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 우선, 주요 영역별로 나누어 그간의 복잡성에 대한 연구성과를 정리한 다음, 이를 토대로 향후 중요시되는 연구과제들을 도출하고자 한다. 신제품개발 과정의 복잡성에 대한 주요연구과제에 대한 이러한 고찰은, 향후 이 분야에 대한 연구 전개에 있어서 하나의 발판이 될 것으로 기대된다.