• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.129-135
• /
• 2021

이 연구의 목적은 머리자세와 목폄근육들의 근긴장도 및 근경직 사이에 상관관계를 검증하기 위해 실시되었다. 연구대상자는 20대 성인 80명으로 시상면에서 평소 머리자세와 목폄근육들에 근긴장도와 근경직을 측정하였다. 측정된 머리자세는 Image J를 사용하여 머리척추각, 머리회전각, 앞쪽어깨각을 분석하였다. 연구결과, 머리척추각이 감소할수록 위등세모근의 근긴장도 및 근경직이 유의하게 증가하고, 머리회전각이 증가할수록 위등세모근의 근긴장도 및 근경직과 유의하게 증가하는 상관관계가 있었다(p<.05). 그리고 연구대상자의 머리척추각을 기준으로 정상머리자세와 앞쪽머리자세로 재분류하여 비교한 결과, 앞쪽머리자세는 정상머리자세보다 위등세모근의 근긴장도 및 근경직이 유의하게 높은 특징을 확인하였다(p<.05). 이 연구결과는 임상에서 앞쪽머리자세의 평가 및 자세교육을 위한 기초자료로 활용되길 기대한다.

• 대한물리의학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.29-34
• /
• 2015

PURPOSE: The purpose of present study was to introduces an exceptional case in measurement methods (CVA, CRA and Cobb angle) to identify the FHP with verified reliability and validity. Subjects: Three males aged 30 years were recruited: A Normal, B and C who have FHP. METHODS: All the subjects were measured CVA, CRA and Cobb angle with the Photogrammetry and Radiography. RESULTS: The results revealed that it is not enough for measurement methods to identify the FHP using CVA, CRA and Cobb angle. On Photogrammetry values; CVA had $65^{\circ}$, CRA was $148^{\circ}$ of Normal subject A and CVA had $61^{\circ}$, CRA was $149^{\circ}$ of FHP subject B and CVA had $51^{\circ}$, CRA was $149^{\circ}$ of FHP subject C. On Radiography values; CVA had $73^{\circ}$, CRA was $148^{\circ}$ and Cobb was $50^{\circ}$ of Normal subject A and CVA had $70^{\circ}$, CRA was $150^{\circ}$ and Cobb was $53^{\circ}$ of FHP subject B and CVA had $61^{\circ}$, CRA was $153^{\circ}$ and Cobb was $31^{\circ}$ of FHP subject C. CONCLUSION: The reliable CVA, CRA and Cobb angle use methods from the previous studies might not be suitable for the diagnose the FHP. We think that it is necessary to have more detailed evaluation methods and the radiography is also needed for clear evaluations because of some possible exceptions.

• 대한물리의학회지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2016

PURPOSE: Forward head posture (FHP) is one of the most common postural problems among white-collar workers who perform highly repetitive tasks in the same position. The aim of this study was to research the effects of thoracic and lumbar support fixtures on forward head posture (FHP) during visual display terminal (VDT) work. METHODS: The subjects were 36 healthy male students with no problems in their medical history or respiratory systems. The subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: control group (n=12), thoracic support fixtures (n=12), and lumbar support fixtures (n=12). We conducted a text typing task of the same content for 20 minutes, and evaluated the angles, including the craniovertebra angle (CVA), craniorotation angle (CRA) with photogrammetry. RESULTS: The thoracic and lumbar support fixture groups showed a statistically significant difference at the CVA and CRA to the control group (p<.05), and the post-hoc test showed an increase of the CVA and decrease of the CRA than the control group. However, when we compared the effects of thoracic and lumbar support fixtures on FHP, there was no significant difference in the difference in decrease of the CVA or increase of the CRA (p>.05). CONCLUSION: We determined that VDT work using thoracic and lumbar support fixtures has a positive effect on forward head posture in white-collar workers. Further studies are required to find the more effective location of support fixtures.