In this study, the correlation between operating stages of waste air-treating system composed of two alternatively-operating UV/photocatalytic reactors, and the deactivation of photocatalyst used in each operating stage, was investigated by instrumental analysis thereon. The repeated deactivation and subsequent re-generation of photocatalyst used in the waste air treating system of previous investigation performed by Lee and Lim (Korean Chem. Eng. Research, 59(4), 574-583(2021)), were characterized on virgin photocatalyst-carrying porous SiO2 media (A4), used photocatalyst-carrying porous SiO2 media (A1, A2 and A3) collected from the corresponding photocatalytic reactor upon 1st, 2nd, and 3rd run, respectively, regenerated photocatalyst-carrying porous SiO2 media upon 1 time-run (AD1) and 3 times regenerated photocatalyst-carrying porous SiO2 media upon 3 time-runs (AD3) by instrumental analysis including BET analysis, SEM, XPS, SEM-EDS and FT-IR. As a result, the proper regeneration-temperature for deactivated photocatalyst to be regenerated several times (more than 3 times), was suggested below 200 ℃. Such temperature of deactivated photocatalyst-regeneration was almost consistent to the one, according to BET analysis, at which tiny nano-pores blocked by adsorbed ethanol-oxidative and degraded intermediates (AEODI), were regenerated to be reopened through almost complete mineralization of AEODI. In particular, the results of XPS analysis indicated an incurrence of insignificant deactivation of photocatalysis upon 1st run of UV/photocatalytic reactor (A or C) of the previous investigation. In addition, the results of XPS analysis were consistent with the experimental results of the previous investigation in that 1) deactivation of photocatalyst incurred during 2nd run of the UV/photocatalytic reactor (A or C) resulted in decreased removal efficiency, by ca. 5% and 5%, of ethanol and hydrogen sulfide, respectively, compared with its 1st run; 2) there was insignificant difference between the removal efficiencies of its 2nd run and 3rd run. Furthermore, the removal efficiencies of ethanol and hydrogen sulfide for hypothetical 4th run of photocatalytic reactor in the previous investigation, using AD3, were expected to decrease, compared with its 3rd run, by much more than those for 2nd run in the previous investigation did, compared with its 1st run.