• International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 2022

Data mining has broad applications that reach beyond scholarly and scientific research and provide internet search engine services that are commonly used forms of Text and Data Mining('TDM') of websites. The exceptions and limitations for data mining provide a competitive advantage in the global race for policy innovation because it permits researchers to conduct computational analysis - TDM on any materials to which they have access. For this purpose, Japan and the EU added limitations on copyright to legalize some TDM research through amendments to copyright law, and the U.S. copyright law has allowed data mining by the fair use provision. On the other hand, there are no explicit exceptions and limitations for data mining under the Korean Copyright Act, and there are no cases considering data mining fair use. We review comparatively exceptions and limitations on copyright which will help to encourage AI-related business by using more data smoothly through the mining process and extracting more valuable information.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.349-369
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 우리나라의 저작권법 제31조(도서관 등에서의 복제 등)가 안고 있는 문제점을 분석하고, 그 개선방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 우리나라 저작권법의 제정과 도서관관련 권리제한 규정의 설치 및 변천 과정을 분석하였다. 도서관 자료의 공정한 이용을 위해 저작권법 제31조에서 다음과 같은 내용 변화가 필요하겠다. 첫째, 도서관관련 권리제한 규정의 영리기관 도서관에 대한 적용은 제한하고, 비영리기관 도서관에 대한 적용은 더 넓힌다. 둘째, 도서관보상금 제도는 폐지한다. 셋째, 복제방지조치, 복제의 양, 도서관간 자료의 상호대차 문제에 대해서는 저작권 단체와 도서관 단체가 상호 긴밀히 논의하여 합리적인 안을 마련한다.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2011

저작권법은 저작권 소유자의 권리와 이용자의 권리 간에 균형을 유지함으로써 지식정보에 대한 접근을 촉진하는 최선의 법적 도구이다. 이러한 측면에서 도서관을 위한 저작권의 제한 및 예외는 학습과 연구를 지원하고 정보의 흐름을 촉진하며, 대중에게 공정한 정보접근을 제공하고 지적 문화유산을 보존하는 데 중요하다. 이에 본 연구는 국내 저작권법의 도서관관련 권리제한조항을 축조분석하여 도서관 보관자료의 보존 및 제공용 복제, 도서관에서 인터넷 정보의 출력과 송신, 재생수단의 입수가 곤란한 자료 및 정부간행물의 보존용 복제와 제공, 장애인을 위한 도서관의 복제와 공중송신에 대한 개선방안을 제시하고 공정이용을 위한 일반규정의 도입방안을 제안하였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.277-301
• /
• 2010

1956년에 영국의회가 도서관(이용자 또는 서비스)을 위한 저작자의 권리를 제한하는 방향으로 저작권법을 개정한 이래로 최근 몇 십년간 도서관과 관련된 권리제한은 각국의 저작권법에서 중요한 부분으로 인식되어 왔다. 그 이유는 도서관을 위한 저작권의 제한이 지적 문화유산을 보존하고, 지식정보에 대한 공정한 접근을 촉진하며, 학습 및 연구를 지원하는데 중요한 법적 수단이기 때문이다. 이에 본 연구는 주요 6개국(미국, 영국, 독일, 프랑스, 일본, 한국)을 대상으로 현행 저작권법의 구조 및 도서관관련 권리제한을 비교 분석하였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.163-194
• /
• 2006

이 연구의 목적은 남북 저작물교류 활성화로 인해 제기되고 있는 남북한 저작물에 대한 저작권 보호문제를 도서관 등에서의 저작권의 제한 상황 하에서 북한저작물의 저작권을 보호함과 동시에 북한자료 이용 활성화 방안을 모색하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 북한 저작권법의 주요 내용과 도서관에서 자료이용에 관한 저작권 제한 관련 규정을 베른협약과 남북한의 저작권법 중심으로 고찰하였다. 현재까지의 남북한 저작권에 관한 연구가 남한에서의 북한저작물 출판 및 배포 유통문제에 따른 저작권 보호에 초점이 맞추어져 왔다. 그러나 이 연구는 북한자료를 연구 조사 목적으로 활용할 수 있도록 지원 창구 역할을 해 온 북한자료센터 등 국내 특수자료 취급기관에서 북한자료 이용 시 도서관 면책 규정에 따른 북한저작물 보호와 이용자의 원활한 정보이용을 위한 다양한 해결 방안을 제시하고 있다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제11권
• /
• pp.69-99
• /
• 1984

A dramatic development in the new technology of copying materials has presented us with massive problems on reconciling the conflicts between copyright owners and potential users of copyrighted materials. The adaptation to this changing condition led some countries to revise their copyright laws such as in the U. S. in 1976 and in Korea in 1984 for merging with the international or universal copyright conventions in the future. Copyright defined as exclusive rights given to copyright owners aims to secure a fair return for an author's creative labor and to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good. The exclusive rights on copyrightable matters, generally for reproduction, preparation of derivative works, public distribution, public performance, and public display, are limited by fair use for scholarship and criticism and by library reproduction for its preservation and interlibrary loan. These limitations on the exclusive rights are concerned with all aspects of library services and cause a great burden on librarian's daily duty to provide balance between the rights of creators and the needs of library patrons. The fair use as one of the limitations on it has been coupled with enormous growth of a new technology and extended from xerography to online database systems. The implementation of the fair use and library reprography in Korean law to the local practices is examined on the basis of the new American copyright act of 1976. Under the draft revision of Korean law, librarians will face many potential problems as summarized below. 1. Because the new provision of 'life time plus 50 years' will tie up substantial bodies of material longer than the old law, until that date librarians would need permissions from the owners and should pay attention to the author's death date. 2. Because the copyright can be sold, distributed, given to the heirs, donated, as a whole or a part, librarians should chase down the heirs and other second owners. In case of a derivative work, this is a real problem. 3. Since a work has its protection from the moment of its creation, the coverage of copyrightable matter would be extended to the published or the unpublished works and librarian's work load would be heavier. Without copyright registration, no one can be certain that a work is in the public domain. Therefore, librarians will need to check with an authority. 4. For implementation of limitations on exclusive rights, fair use and library reproduction for interlibrary loan, there can be no substantial aggregate use and there can be no systematic distribution of multicopies. Therefore, librarians should not substitute reproductions for subscriptions or purchases. 5. For the interlibrary loan by photocopying, librarians should understand the procedure of royalty payment. 6. Compulsory licenses should be understood by librarians. 7. Because the draft revision of Korean law is a reciprocal treaty, librarians should take care of other countries' copyright law to protect foreign authors from Korean law. In order to solve the above problems, some suggestions are presented below. 1. That copyright clearinghouse or central agency as a centralized royalty payment mechanism be established. 2. That the Korean Library Association establish a committee on copyright. 3. That the Korean Library Association propose guidelines for each occasion, e.g. for interlibrary loan, books and periodicals and music, etc. 4. That the Korean government establish a copyright office or an official organization for copyright control other than the copyright committee already organized by the government. 5. That the Korean Library Association establish educational programs on copyright for librarians through seminars or articles written in its magazines. 6. That individual libraries provide librarian's copyright kits. 7. That school libraries distribute subject bibliographies on copyright law to teachers. However, librarians should keep in mind that limitations on exclusive rights are not for an exemption from library reprography but as a convenient access to library resources.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.315-343
• /
• 2013

공공저작물은 국민의 세금에 의해 작성된 것이므로, 공공의 이익을 위해 민간의 무상의 자유로운 접근 및 이용이 보장되어야 한다. 이를 위해서는 무엇보다도 저작권 처리 문제를 해결할 수 있는 법률적 근거가 마련되어야 한다. 이에 본 연구는 공공저작물의 법적 개념과 공공기관의 개념 및 범위에 대해 검토하였다. 공공저작물의 저작권 보호를 제한하는 입법사례로 미국, 영국 및 독일의 저작권법 관련 규정과 최근에 입법 예고된 개정안들을 분석하였고, 이어서 공공저작물과 관련한 국내 현행 저작권법상의 저작권 보호의 제한 규정 및 저작권법 일부개정안을 상세히 분석하였다. 이러한 분석 결과에 기초하여, 본 연구는 도서관에서의 공공저작물의 이용 활성화를 위하여 저작권 제한을 큰 폭으로 확대하는 법률개정안을 제시하였다.

• International journal of advanced smart convergence
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.181-186
• /
• 2021

Among human intellectual creations, the right granted by law to what is worth protecting is defined as intellectual property rights. Copyright is a legal right to creative finished products made by individuals, and in recent years, this legal right has been recognized as very important. In other words, copyright is a system created to protect the rights of individuals who created creations and to recognize their efforts. Works subject to copyright vary from poetry, thesis, novels to designs, paintings, music, and architecture, and the scope of the subject is gradually expanding. Recently, research has begun on how far the Metaverse design area absorbed into the real world among works. Computer-generated video productions and software program works are also subject to digital copyright protection, but it is also true that the interpretation of the author protection law for works, designs, and trademarks in the virtual world is unclear. This study aims to analyze copyrights based on case studies and theoretical backgrounds on copyright protection and to discuss the protection limitations of Metaverse design in the virtual world. In other words, the direction for the protection of Metaverse design is presented through clear distinction and definition of copyright protection in the tertiary virtual world. This study aims to present methods for design copyright protection in the era of Metaverse, respect copyright holders' creative activities, and develop our culture through protection of creations.

• 한국멀티미디어학회논문지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.262-273
• /
• 2020

This paper analyzes the existing copyright management and copyright sharing model and discusses the limitations. It then proposes a consortium Blockchain-based copyright management model in which the service platform participates as a node, and discusses how to combine the My Data concept with Blockchain and smart contracts. Also, Blockchain-based CP-ABE is introduced and applied to the proposed model as a way for users to define access policies and store copyright data in encrypted form on the storage of the online service providers (OSP). Compared with the existing copyright management model, the proposed model allows the copyright holder to focus on copyright registration, license content design, and sharing, as the data subject. And it is expected to be able to transparently manage the usage records and the basis for the settlement of the copyrighted data that are shared and used on each platform.

• International journal of advanced smart convergence
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.44-54
• /
• 2023

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the implications of the metaverse on the music industry, focusing on copyright issues and potential solutions. It delves into the concept and characteristics of metaverse platforms, describing them as environments that immerse users in a variety of virtual experiences. A significant portion of the paper is dedicated to exploring music use and copyright infringement in the metaverse. It examines how users incorporate existing music into their content, often leading to legal challenges due to copyright infringement. The paper discusses the role of online service providers (OSPs) in this context and the legal implications of their actions. The paper also addresses the 'safe harbor' provisions for OSPs and examines the balance between protecting rights holders and limiting OSP liability. It highlights the challenges and limitations of copyright enforcement in the metaverse, especially given the unique nature of content on platforms such as Roblox. Finally, the article proposes solutions to simplify music licensing in the metaverse, suggesting a shift from property rules to liability rules and the establishment of Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) to streamline the licensing process and better protect copyright holders' interests.