• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2010년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회 1부
• /
• pp.185-189
• /
• 2010

As recent construction project has specialization and high-level of the engineering, Although, It has always uncertainty of agreement and contract enforcement, factors of difficult to predict etc. in each phase. In this process, Various interest groups involved are continuously generated dispute of interest each others. So this paper analyzed the dispute cases in construction projects from the Supreme Court and Korean Commercial Arbitration Board in Korea, and then identified the dispute types and causes that occur during all of the construction project phases with their influence analysis. At the result, It will be contributed to the basic data for pre-dispute prevention in the construction projects.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제57권
• /
• pp.79-108
• /
• 2013

International transactions of plant and construction project need to time to time for completing the contract. During the performing the contract there may arise many claims and disputes it should be settled rapidly for processing schedule of works. However, arbitration and litigation for settlement of dispute are inappropriate in time and expense under the specifications of plant and construction project. Dispute boards are one of the successful resolution method of dispute prior to litigation or arbitration. If the dispute board was failed, of course, it may be allowed to continue into litigation or arbitration. As the creative methods of parties agreement, dispute boards may be expected to avoid claims and dispute in long and medium international contract. The purpose of this paper is to explore the specification and limitations of dispute boards that may clear disputes under long and medium contract of construction and procurement. It needs to be understand to determine whether is the useful methods for resolving dispute in the international project. This paper considers the specific natures of dispute board and its rules, procedures and problems including ICC and FIDIC for the contract of long and medium transaction.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 4th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Organized by the University of New South Wales
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2011

Mediation has long been praised as one of effective dispute resolution methods in the area of construction law. Article 85-1 of the Taiwan Government Procurement Act was amended and promulgated by presidential decree on July 4, 2007. The second paragraph of the Article elaborates explicitly, "In the event that the application for mediation referred to in the preceding paragraph is made by the supplier, the agency may not object to such application." Beyond that, if an unsuccessful mediation of a construction dispute is due to the agency's disagreeing with the proposal or resolution for mediation proposed by the Complaint Review Board for Government Procurement ("CRBGP"), the agency may not object to the arbitration filed by the supplier. It undoubtedly reinforces the importance of the mediation-arbitration procedure. Accordingly, this paper elaborates on the mediation mechanism in Taiwan in the framework of construction disputes first. After that, dispute resolution of a local public work case is provided to demonstrate the practice of construction mediation in Taiwan. Lastly, this study proposes suggestions on applying mediation to ease similar subsequent cases.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.48-56
• /
• 2017

건설사업은 목적물의 특성, 사업규모, 계약방식 등에 따라 다양한 사업주체가 참여하고 그로인해 복잡한 의사소통 구조를 가지고 있기 때문에 이해관계의 대립으로 인한 클레임 및 분쟁이 지속적으로 발생하고 있다. 그런데 분쟁의 사례를 살펴보면 상당수가 시공사와 발주자 사이에서 발생하고, 발주자의 우월적 지위에 따른 불공정 관행이 원인이 되어 분쟁이 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 상대적으로 계약적 약자인 시공사를 정보 활용 주체로 설정하고 대한상사중재원의 중재판정 사례를 바탕으로 분쟁 발생 유형 및 원인별 분석뿐만 아니라 보상비용 등에 관한 분석을 수행하여 시공사의 분쟁에 따른 시간적, 경제적 손실을 최소화하고자 하였다. 이를 통해 공사 수행 중 발생 가능한 분쟁 대응전략을 수립하는데 도움을 줌으로 써 원활한 합의 유도 및 공사의 완성도를 높이는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2001년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.40-45
• /
• 2001

중재를 이용한 최근의 국내 대형 건설공사의 건설분규 해결사례들을 볼 때, 복잡한 건설분규가 합리적으로 해결되는 절차가 국내에도 새롭게 적용되고 있으며 이는 앞으로도 더욱 확산될 전망이다. 이 논문에서는 이를 바탕으로 하여 건설분규 해결절차의 새로운 정립을 위하여 기존의 절차를 확대하여 새롭게 고려하여야 할 점들을 고찰하여 보기로 한다. 건설분규를 합리적으로 관리(Manage)하기 위해서는 분규해결을 위한 사후대처 뿐만이 아닌 사전에 할 수 있는 분규대처 방안도 함께 검토하여 보기로 한다. 또한 기존 국내의 분규해결 절차를 분석하고 미국에서 현재 활용되는 대체분규해결(ADR) 절차들과 비교하고자 한다. 분규해결 절차의 정립은 분규가 발생된 이후의 대체해결 방안에 관하여 연구하는 기존의 접근방식과는 달리 미리 건설분규의 요소들을 관리하고 진단할 수 있는 "분규가능성(Disputability)"을 통하여 분규의 예측 및 회피를 추구하는 폭넓은 접근방식에서 미국의 대체분규해결 절차들을 분석하고자 한다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 4th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Organized by the University of New South Wales
• /
• pp.350-356
• /
• 2011

Early neutral evaluation (ENE) is a fairly recent form of alternative dispute resolution procedure used in the construction industry. In the UK, ENE is usually carried out on an entirely without prejudice basis, however the parties may agree that any or part of it may be referred to at trial or any subsequent hearing. The early neutral evaluation consists of a preliminary assessment of the issues in dispute for use as a basis for negotiations which may result in a settlement of the dispute. An independent person is appointed by the parties who reviews the case and provides an opinion, in written form and in some detail, with reasons on the merits of the matters in dispute. The opinion is non-binding but provides the parties with what in the opinion of the independent person a formal tribunal may decide whether a court or an arbitrator, if the dispute is not resolved. However, ENE has yet to take off in the construction industry in the UK. This paper will explain this procedure and explore the use of it in the UK and internationally, considering the benefits and drawbacks of its use. It will consider whether or not it is more effective than other early resolution forms such as mediation and adjudication. It will argue and conclude that it is a very useful cost effective procedure, particularly in the resolution of complex disputes, whether local or international.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2004년도 제5회 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.437-441
• /
• 2004

선진국에서는 건설분쟁을 소송 외 분쟁해결방법(ADR)에 의한 해결이 보편화 되어 있다. 최근 우리나라에서도 공공건설공사에서의 계약상대자간의 클레임이 증가하는 추세이다. 그러나 현행 공공공사 도급계약의 분쟁해결 조항은 분쟁 해결절차가 명시되지 않아 적시의 클레임 제기에 어려움이 있고, 소송과 중재를 동시에 규정한 선택적 중재조항으로 되어있어 중재에 의한 분쟁해결의 걸림돌이 되고 있다. 이에 국내외의 분쟁해결제도 및 절차를 검토하고 판례를 연구하여 선택적 중재조항에 대한 해설방법을 고찰하여 공사계약일반조건 분쟁해결조항의 개선방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.489-517
• /
• 2004

The resolution of the 1993 Uruguay Round and the opening of Korea's construction market in '97 marked the beginning of the globalization of Korea's domestic construction market. Consequently, the process led to changes in contracting procedures, as well as disputes in construction management. With globalization came a rapid realization of reasonable values, which forced the hierarchical vertical relationship between the owners, constructors, and subcontractors into a more equal, horizontal relationship. Once the hierarchical relationship was altered, the late 1990's witnessed a dramatic increase in managerial disagreements, in addition to escalating legal disputes and expenditures. The horizontal relationship was a new concept and brought forth many complexities. Unfortunately, because all of this was new, management of construction disputes was elementary at best. Anticipation of disputes is the key to effective dispute management. This includes thorough reviews of contract documents, document management, construction records, and checklists. Also necessary is the education of owners and contractors with pertinent knowledge concerning dispute management. The following paper focuses on the importance of observing construction disputes in order to facilitate management thereof.

• Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.24-34
• /
• 2016

Disputes seem to be synonymous with large-scale construction projects in Ethiopia. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors responsible for impacting the performance of Ethiopian public construction projects. To this end, 35 success and failure attributes responsible for impacting the performance of the projects were identified and presented to Ethiopian construction professionals in the form of a structured questionnaire, and responses were collected. The factor analysis conducted on the success and failure attributes influencing no-dispute performance separately resulted in six success factors and five failure factors. Further analysis using stepwise multiple regression indicates that owner competence and interaction among project participants have a positive impact on no-dispute performance. However, conflict among project participants has a negative impact on the no-dispute performance of Ethiopian public construction projects. Although Ethiopia-specific, the results reflect construction management problems common to both developed and developing countries. The findings are expected to help researchers and practitioners gain a better understanding of critical success and failure factors and to help them take proactive measures to avoid disputes in public construction projects.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.315-344
• /
• 2004

Although we try to increase the order of turn key construction for the international competitiveness strengthening, the construction quality advancement and the productivity enhancement of the public sectors, the problems of the domestic turn key systems are causing the hardships of all the participants and many possible disputes. The home turn key constructions have been activated since 1997. A lot of trial and error had been experienced in these days, and the turn key systems have been changed little by little. But the bases are continuously kept because of their reflecting all the participants' opinions. In the inner turn key constructions the problems of uniform types are repeatedly occurred, and, especially, many problems happen up to the stage of early stage owing to the specialties of the turn key construction. So the dispute factors of the Korean turn key constructions were abstracted through the literature searches, the site document examinations, the case studies and the interviews with the experts. When the technicians meeting the interior turn key construction for the first time and working here now are well acquainted with only these factors, many disputes will be prevented.