• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.261-267
• /
• 1999

Purpose : In FSRT (Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy) planning, we studied the usefulness between multiple arc FSRT and conformal FSRT by comparing tumor shape and DVH (dose volume histogram). Materials and Methods In Chungnam Univ. hospital, we had treated the sixteen patients with FSRT from Aug. 1997 to Dec. 1998. In choosing multiple arc FSRT or conformal FSRT, we had considered If (irregular factor) after calculating tumor volume and surface area. We had considered multiple arc FSRT if tumor shape was similar to sphere or the value of If was less than 1.25, conformal FSRT if tumor shape was very irregular or If was more than 1.3. For evaluation of treatment planning, we had considered the appropriate DVH for tumor volume and for critical organs. Results : The errors between reference point and the coordinates point on AP, Lat radiography were less than 1 mm before treatment. We had planned $3\~$5 arcs for multiple arc FSRT, $5\~6$ports for conformal FSRT. The mean dose distribution of tumor volume of cumulative DVH between multiple arc FSRT and conformal FSRT was 90.6, 85%, respectively. The dose of critical organs irradiated was less than $5\%$ maximum dose of cumulative DVH. Conclusion : We had obtained the similar value between multiple arc FSRT and conformal FSRT, so that we had appropriate treatment planning of FSRT for multiple arc FSRT and conformal FSRT according to tumor shape and size.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.28-33
• /
• 2003

The aim of the study was to assess the isocenter deviation between multiple arcs and conformal beams in frameless FSRT. Forty seven patients received single isocenter radiosurgery or therapy (SRS/T) using available framelss FSRT system from Aug. 1997 to Dec. 2m. In choosing multiple arc FSRT or conformal FSRT, we had considered one of two techniques with respect to tumor size and tumor shape. In multiple arc FSRT, the average and standard deviation (SD) of the isocenter deviation was 0.2 mm (SD 0.2 mm), 0.2 mm (SD 0.2) and 0.3 mm (SD 0.2 mm)in the lateral (x), anterior-posterior (y) and cranio-caudal directions (z). In conformal FSRT, the average deviation and SD of the isocenter deviation was 0.2 mm (SD 0.2 mm), 0.3 mm(0.2 mm) and 0.4 mm (SD 0.2 mm) in the x, y and z directions. The average spacial deviation ($\Delta$r) was 0.41 mm and 0.54 mm in multiple arcs and conformal beams, respectively. The isocenter deviation using frameless FSRT system was similar value between multiple arcs and conformal beams. In practice, we believed we can select the appropriate treatment technique according to tumor shape and size.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Medical Physics Conference
• /
• 1999.11a
• /
• pp.90-90
• /
• 1999