• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.23-39
• /
• 2009

다양한 요구사항을 최신의 IT서비스로 제공하기 위해서는 끊임없는 기술 개발과 비즈니스의 이해가 필수적이지만, IT서비스 업계의 한정된 인력과 수행력으로 충족시키기에는 현실적으로 불가능하다. 따라서 IT서비스 업계에서는 다양한 산업군의 사업을 객관적인 방법으로 평가하여 사업의 우선순위 도출을 통해 집중해야 할 사업선택 전략이 필수적으로 요구된다. 본 연구는 다양하고 불확실한 사업을 객관화되고 산업별 특화된 기준으로 평가할 수 있는 프레임워크 개발을 목적으로 한다. 구조화된 평가요인은 가중치와 평가 가이드 라인을 제공함으로써 정량적, 정성적 평가를 통해 IT서비스 사업의 경쟁력지수(CI：Competitiveness Index)를 도출할 수 있도록 설계되었다. 개발된 평가요인과 프레임워크는 실무에 적용되어 이해관계자간의 갈등 조정 및 의사결정자의 종합적 판단을 지원할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권5호
• /
• pp.2207-2214
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 지역 간 고용격차를 파악하고, 고용경쟁력 평가지표를 통해 지역현황 및 특성을 분석하기 위한 연구이다. 첫째, 지역 간 고용격차는 심화되고 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 질적 측면과 안정성 측면에서의 격차가 더욱 심각한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 지역별 고용경쟁력은 충남, 서울, 울산, 경북, 대전 등의 순으로 나타났으며, 부산은 고용위험 지역으로 분류되었다. 셋째, 고용경쟁력에 가장 많은 영향을 미치는 요인은 안정성 측면의 지표들인 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 지역 간 고용격차를 완화하고 고용경쟁력을 강화하기 위해서는 양질의 안정적인 일자리를 창출하기 위한 노력이 필요하며, 특히 고용위험 지역의 경우에는 지속적인 모니터링이 요구된다.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제9권12호
• /
• pp.15-21
• /
• 2018

Purpose - In order to improve the comprehensive competitiveness of cultural tourism creative industries in the region, different grade cities should adapt to local conditions and differentiated development as the angle. It can promote the optimization of regional tourism industry structure, and make relevant suggestions accordingly. Research design, data, and methodology - Based on the characteristics of cultural tourism creative industry, 24 indicators are selected from four aspects. The comprehensive competitiveness evaluation index system of cultural tourism creative industry is constructed. The essay use factor analysis to quantitatively evaluate 27 cities in the Pan-Yangtze River Delta, and use cluster analysis to classify the competitiveness of cultural tourism creative industries in each city into five types. Results - The results of cluster analysis show that the whole area presents five kinds of step-like features, which are mature leading type, the advantageous development type, comparatively advantageous type, well-grounded type and difference-promotion type. Conclusions - The factor analysis method was used to quantitatively evaluate 27 cities in the Pan-Yangtze River Delta, and cluster analysis was used to classify the cultural tourism creative industry competitiveness of each city into fives type city. Based on the differentiation of cultural tourism creative industry competitiveness and 27 cities in the Pan-Yangtze River Delta, the relevant strategies were proposed.

• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.245-256
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 환경산업 해외시장 진출 전략 수립을 위하여 선진국과의 환경산업 기술경쟁력을 평가하고자 하였다. 환경산업 기술경쟁력을 평가하기 위하여 국내·외 환경산업기술 분류체계를 바탕으로 환경산업 분야별 중점 기술을 분류하고, 기술경쟁력 평가지표를 구축하였다. 평가지표 자료 구축을 수행한 후 델파이 분석 및 논문·특허 분석, 수출·입 분석을 수행하였으며, 지표값에 대한 표준화 분석을 수행하였다. 또한, AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 기법을 통해 평가지표별 가중치를 산정하여 한국, 미국, 영국, 독일, 프랑스의 환경산업기술 경쟁력 평가 결과를 도출하였다. 평가 결과, 모든 환경산업 분야에서 미국이 상대적으로 기술경쟁력이 가장 높은 것으로 평가되었으며, 한국은 선진국에 비해 상대적으로 가장 낮은 경쟁력을 가지고 있는 것으로 평가되었다. 특히, 한국은 다매체 환경관리 및 지속가능 사회시스템 구축분야가 선진국에 비해 기술경쟁력 수준이 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 국내 환경산업기술이 글로벌 선진시장에 진출하기 위해서는 국내 강점인 사물인터넷, 클라우드, 빅데이터, 모바일, 인공지능 기반의 4차 환경산업 개발을 통해 경쟁력을 강화해야 할 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2013년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.216-219
• /
• 2013

The objective of this study is an assessment of competitiveness in construction infrastructure by nation in order to provide preliminary data of government policy. Key results indicated that out of 23 countries, Korea's construction market size ranked 11th, construction market growth rate ranked 16th, market stability ranked 14th, construction risk ranked 4th, construction system ranked 10th, ICT ranked 1st. And Korea was ranked 10th in overall construction infrastructure competitiveness by nation.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2018년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.286-287
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to provide basic data of government policy by evaluating the competitiveness of construction infrastructures by country. The results of this study are as follows: Among the 20 countries, Korea ranked the 10th in the construction market stability, 12th in the construction system, and 10th in the infrastructure, 12th in the overall construction infrastructure competitiveness.

• 한국수소및신에너지학회논문집
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.461-469
• /
• 2006

This paper deals with the national competitiveness of hydrogen energy. The effectiveness of investments for hydrogen energy R&D and constructions of hydrogen energy infrastructures can be evaluated by the national competitiveness of hydrogen energy, and it is evaluated by an AHP(analytic hierarchy process) method. The evaluation indices of the national competitiveness are selected as the technical level, the number of researchers, the investments for R&D, and the infrastructure of hydrogen energy. Similarly, the technical level is divided into the number of published papers, the number of foreign patents, and the number of published proceeding papers. The evaluation indices of the technical level and the number of researchers were investigated by database searches. It appears that South Korea locates the sixth position in the world. The results of our study suggest that South Korea is relatively competitive in the technical level and the number of researchers. However, our country needs the long-term and well-focused R&D, and the expansion of infrastructures to enhance the national competitiveness of hydrogen energy in the future.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.20-36
• /
• 2020

Purpose - As the global product network expands through both internationalization and diversification of the multimodal transportation system, corporate strategies have shifted to emphasize the importance of a high value-added international logistics system. To guide policies and strategies to attract relevant industries, this study aims to analyze the location competitiveness of regional logistics distribution center to serve Northeast Asia. Design/methodology - Multi-criteria techniques are considered to offer a promising framework for evaluating decision-making factors. This paper employed an analytic hierarchy process to analyze the hierarchal structure of determinants for selecting the location of a regional logistics distribution center. Adopting both qualitative and quantitative evaluations, this study suggest political implications for a regional logistics distribution center development, such as the direction of political support, service differentiation and infrastructure development. Findings - This study developed a location competitiveness evaluation model, based on the case study of the major port-cities in Northeast Asia. Evaluation model incorporates five factors underpinning 17 components extracted using factor analysis. The results revealed that the logistics factor is the most significant factor for evaluating the competitiveness of a regional logistics distribution center. The remaining factors were market, costs, and services environment. Comparing qualitative and quantitative evaluations, results provide useful insights for a regional logistics distribution center development in Northeast Asia. Originality/value - This study revealed differences between qualitative and quantitative evaluations. The finding implies that prior works on evaluation models of competitiveness has not successfully measured the gap between quantitative data and expert' evaluations. To overcome this limitation, this paper considered both actual data such as actual distance, cost, the number of companies located, and expert opinions.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.103-124
• /
• 2013

This study aims to develop a framework to measure MOT competitiveness of enterprises while proposing a concept called management of technology competitiveness (MOTC). The framework of MOTC based on both resource-based view and competence-based view is consisted of technology competitiveness and management competitiveness. A variety of metrics to measure MOTC are extracted through substantial literature review. As technology competitiveness metric, this study examines R&D investment, R&D workforce, R&D facilities, intellectual property assets, and utilization of information and communication technology; as metric of management competitiveness, leadership competitiveness, maturity of the R&D systems, collaboration and partnership, learning and innovation, and commercialization are considered. We then confirm and derive the multi-dimensions of MOTC through its reliability and validity analysis. The study is expected to provide useful guidelines and references for enterprises' self-evaluation of technology and management competitiveness that is equally applicable to small, medium, and large enterprises that must compete in the global marketplace.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제39권5호
• /
• pp.423-429
• /
• 2015

The expansion on the scale of international trade and rapid economic growth in Northeast Asia have caused intense competition among global companies for securing international logistics center in Northeast Asia. Analyzing location competitiveness for international logistics center in Northeast Asia, this paper aims to extract implications for enhancing locational competitiveness. Employing the relative importance among location selection factors extracted from AHP analysis in prior study, we evaluated the major five port-cities in Northeast Asia including Busan, Gwangyang, Shanghai, Qingdao and Tokyo. In the evaluations, Shanghai (3.926) ranked as the first, followed by Busan (3.859), Qingdao (3.555), Tokyo (3.013) and Gwangyang (2.915). Furthermore, the causal relationships between determinants for location choice decision (logistics factor, cost factor, market factor, service factor and environmental factor) and dependent variables (competitiveness of international logistics center, potentiality to growth, present intention to move into and future plan to move into) were analyzed to provide implications. Results provide useful insights for further improvements, and helps strategic agenda for future development of port-cities.