• 무역학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.1-25
• /
• 2017

본 논문에서는 계층화 분석법(AHP)을 활용하여 중국진출 중소·벤처기업의 경영위험요인의 중요도와 우선순위에 대하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과를 보면 제조기업의 경영위험요인의 중요도는 인건비 상승, 치열한 시장경쟁, 인사관리 문제, 재료비 상승 순으로 나타났다. 제조품목별 분석결과를 보면, 전자제품의 경우는 인건비 상승과 더불어 조세정책 변화가 주요요인으로, 화학제품은 환경보호법 강화가 중요한 요인으로, 자동차부품의 경우에는 인건비 상승외에 재료비 상승 또한 주요 위험관리요인으로 분석되었다. 중국 진출시기별로는 1990년대 진출한 기업은 치열한 시장경쟁 및 조세정책 변화가 주요 위험요인으로, 2000년대 진출한 기업의 경우 재료비 상승 등이 인건비 상승 외에 중요한 관리요인으로 분석되었다.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.207-213
• /
• 2023

우리나라는 인구절벽과 출산율 저하에 직면하고 있으며, 우리 군은 장교 모집 경쟁률이 해마다 급격하게 감소하고 있다. 이러한 상황은 국가안보 측면에서 심각한 문제이며 우수 인력획득을 위한 노력이 필요하다. 이를 위해서는 군의 주요 모집대상인 MZ세대에 대한 세심한 고찰을 통한 그들의 직업가치를 파악하고, 직업으로서의 군인에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 군 내·외적 환경을 면밀하게 분석하여 문제별 진단과 해결책을 찾아야 한다. 이에 우리는 군 특수성을 고려하여 현 실태를 진단하고, 군의 장교 모집대상 자원인 MZ세대가 추구하는 주요 직업 선택 요인을 살펴봄과 동시에 외국군 사례를 분석하여 군 장교 모집 경쟁률 향상방안을 제시한다. MZ세대를 대상으로 군 장교를 확보하고 장기적으로 활용하기 위해서는 이들이 추구하는 직업 가치를 충족시키는 종합적인 개선 노력이 필요하다.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.38-53
• /
• 2007

In a seminal judgment of November 2002 (Case C-476/98) relating to the compatibility with Community laws of the 'nationality clause' in the 1996 amending protocol to the 1955 U.S.-German Air Services Agreement, the European Court of Justice(ECJ) decided that the provision constituted a measure of an intrinsically discriminatory nature and was thus contrary to the principle of national treatment established under Art. 52 of the EC Treaty. The Court, rejecting bluntly the German government' submissions relying on public policy grounds(Art. 56, EC Treaty), seemed content to declare and rule that the protocol provision requiring a contracting state party to ensure substantial ownership and effective control by its nationals of its designated airlines had violated the requirement of national treatment reserved for other Community Members under the salient Treaty provision. The German counterclaims against the Commission, although tantalizing not only from the perusal of the judgment but from the perspective of international air law, were nonetheless invariably correct and to the point. For such a clause has been justified to defend the 'fundamental interests of society from a serious threat' that may result from granting operating licenses or necessary technical authorizations to an airline company of a third country. Indeed, the nationality clause has been inserted in most of the liberal bilaterals to allow the parties to enforce their own national laws and regulations governing aviation safety and security. Such a clause is not targeted as a device for discriminating against the nationals of any third State. It simply acts as the minimum legal safeguards against aviation risk empowering a party to take legal control of the designated airlines. Unfortunately, the German call for the review of such a foremost objective and rationale underlying the nationality clause landed on the deaf ears of the Court which appeared quite happy not to take stock of the potential implications and consequences in its absence and of the legality under international law of the 'national treatment' requirement of Community laws. Again, while US law limits foreign shareholders to 24.9% of its airlines, the European Community limits non-EC ownership to 49%, precluding any ownership and effective control by foreign nationals of EC airlines, let alone any foreign takeover and merger. Given this, it appears inconsistent and unreasonable for the EC to demand, $vis-{\grave{a}}-vis$ a non-EC third State, national treatment for all of its Member States. The ECJ's decision was also wrongly premised on the precedence of Community laws over international law, and in particular, international air law. It simply is another form of asserting and enforcing de facto extraterritorial application of Community laws to a non-EC third country. Again, the ruling runs counter to an established rule of international law that a treaty does not, as a matter of principle, create either obligations or rights for a third State. Aside from the legal problems, the 'national treatment' may not be economically justified either, in light of the free-rider problem and resulting externalities or inefficiency. On the strength of international law and economics, therefore, airlines of Community Members other than the designated German and U.S. air carriers are neither eligible for traffic rights, nor entitled to operate between or 'free-ride' on the U.S. and German points. All in all and in all fairness, the European Court's ruling was nothing short of an outright condemnation of established rules and principles of international law and international air law. Nor is the national treatment requirement justified by the economic logic of deregulation or liberalization of aviation markets. Nor has the requirement much to do with fair competition and increased efficiency.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.145-181
• /
• 2013

일반항공은 민간항공분야의 중요한 구성요소로서 상업비행을 제외한 광범위한 분야를 아우르며 주권국의 경제적 수요와 안전 요구사항을 충족시키기 위하여 각기 상이한 운항 절차와 방식으로 개별 국가들에 의해 규제되는 특징을 가지고 있다. 지난 30년간 중국의 상업항공은 중국의 경제 발전과 함께 급속한 성장을 이루어 왔지만 일반항공분야는 이와 함께 발전해오지 못하고 상업항공분야에 비해 상대적으로 경시되어왔다고 할 수 있다. 그리하여 현재 중국의 일반항공산업은 최근 중국정부의 저고도공역 개선 정책과 더불어 근본적인 변화와 성장을 맞이할 준비가 되어있지만 현재 관련 산업을 규율하고 있는 중국 일반항공법의 흠결이 일반항공 부문의 발전을 가로막고 있으며 일관되지 못한 법의 적용이 여러 혼란을 야기하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 논문은 다음과 같이 중국 일반항공법의 흠결을 분석하였다. 국제민간항공기구(ICAO)와 여러 ICAO 회원국이 채택한 일반항공에대한 다양한 정의를 검토한 후 미국, 유럽연합(EU), 호주 그리고 중국의 일반항공산업 발전에 대하여 살펴보았다. 또한 시카고 협약과 부속서 그리고 그 외 다양한 중국내 관련법을 분석하며 중국 일반항공법의 법원(法原)에 대해서 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 여러 관련규정들 내의 각기 다른 정의조항과 법리적 모순, 정부보조금 집행 원칙의 개선 필요성, 온실가스 배출이나 소음문제와 같은 환경보호 문제등을 예로들며 현재 중국 일반항공법의 결함을 지적하였다. 이에따라 본 연구는 건전하고 진보적이며 지속가능한 일반항공분야의 발전을 위해 공정경쟁과 항공안전이 보장될 수 있는 일관성있고 체계적인 법률체제가 뒷받침 되어야 한다는 결론을 도출하였으며 이를 위한 다양한 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제6권7호
• /
• pp.219-228
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 방과후학교 민간위탁의 정책 변화과정을 조사하고, 향후 대안을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 본 연구를 위해 정책관련 연구 자료와 관련 법규를 문헌조사 하였다. 조사결과 2004년부터 2008년은 교육부에서 방과후학교 운영계획을 수립하였으나 학교운영위원회의 심의(자문)를 통해 단위학교의 자율로 민간위탁이 진행되었고, 2008년부터 2015년은 교육부와 시도교육청에서 공동으로 제작한 '방과후학교 운영 가이드라인'에 제시된 표준화된 절차를 따르고 있었으며, 2016년 이후에는 방과후학교 민간위탁 시 계약법을 적용하도록 하는 등 정책 변화가 있었다. 2016년 이후의 정책 변화는 방과후학교 민간위탁의 투명성 확보 필요성과 함께 방과후학교 민간위탁 계약규모가 커지면서 계약법을 준수해야 하는 법적 필요성에 기인한다. 하지만 최저가 입찰방식으로 인해 방과후학교 교육의 질이 떨어질 수밖에 없다는 우려의 목소리도 함께 제기되고 있다. 정부에서는 기초금액에서 일정비율 이상을 인건비로 지급하도록 하여 지나친 가격경쟁을 방지하는 대안을 제시하였지만, 본 논문에서는 보다 근본적인 해결 방안으로 방과후학교 교육활동 및 시도의 특수성을 담아내는 시도의 조례를 제정하는 방안을 제시하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제23권
• /
• pp.3-38
• /
• 2004

On-line game business has emerged as the most lucrative entertainment industry, with over 4 million players in China, with more than 45% of the market dominated by Korean on-line games. While the interactive entertainment market continues to expand, with many new Korean on-line game publishers entering the market, relatively little is known about which factors influence online game players' behavioral intentions (i.e., intention to play, brand-identity, word of mouth, flow, etc.) in this area. It appears that in this extremely attractive and growing services segment, academics, as well as practitioners, would benefit from investigating the relationships among the players' intention to play, social norms, word of mouth, flow, and the impacts of several other key game-related constructs. A conceptual framework is proposed and a simultaneous equation model is developed. This paper develops the exploratory LISREL model for identifying the factors affecting the players' intention to play for on-line games. Based on data collected from on-line questionnaire survey in China, the validity of the model has been tested and interesting conclusions have been developed concerning the relationships between the game-related constructs. It is hoped that this result might provide the useful guidelines for developing the successful on-line game contents. With better understanding of the players' behavioral intentions, Korean on-line game developers should be able to penetrate the China market with sustainable advantage over their competition.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제23권
• /
• pp.341-372
• /
• 2004

Since China was admitted to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on December 11, 2001, China has sped up its active participation in the competition of the world economy by lifting its trade and investment restrictions and limits. Its trading system is getting more and more free and its huge market with a population of 1.3 billion has been getting more and more open. With Chinas WTO accession, China has been honoring its commitments to its WTO members by complying with international business practices and WTO rules. For example, it will cut down its import tariffs for automobiles from the present 80% to 25% by 2006. Its financial sector and service industries are open to foreign investors now. As Chinas biggest business partner, Japan has benefited tremendously from Chinas open policies and deepening economic reform. In order to reduce the costs of production, a large number of enterprises from Japan have set up production bases in China since a Chinese workers wages accounts for only one tenth of those of a Japanese worker on the average. Japan has become one of Chinas biggest investors on a par with the United States of America (USA). How are the Japanese enterprises in Japan and in China adjusting themselves to the rapid changes of the Chinese market? What characteristics do the Japanese enterprises in China have? What effects has Chinas WTO accession had on those Japanese enterprises that have invested in China? This paper finds answers to the above questions. It at first reviews the Sino-Japanese economic and trade relations since 1980s, then analyses the situation and characteristics of Japanese-invested enterprises in China, and explores their problems in China. Finally it puts forward some suggestions for the Japanese enterprises in China.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.117-138
• /
• 2008

This study lies on building the International Standardization of China Arbitration System for improving a relationship of mutual trust and the safety trade between China and other worldwide countries, especially, South Korea as their one of the biggest trading partners through the comparative analysis of China and UNCITRAL Arbitration Law. In this analysis, the differences from China and UNCITRAL in arbitration law are like belows ; lack of arbitrator's international mind, the limitation of private property right, prohibition of Ad. hoc arbitration, arbitrator's biased nationalism, localism, and their short specialties. a deficiency of the objectiveness for arbitrator's election, a judgement rejection of claimants by using nonattendance and walkout, impossibility of prior and temporary property custody for execution of arbitration award. etc. For the improvement of the International Standardization of China Arbitration, this paper propose as follows: 1) Extension of private property right, reorganization of tax system, realization of open competition, exclusion of 'Sinocentrism', globalization of arbitration system 2) The abolition of old fashioned bureaucracy with approval for ad.hoc arbitration 3) An education for arbitrator's internationalization, specialty, and to promote legal knowledge 4) A settlement of the third country arbitrators' selection for reflecting interested party's decision by the court in a selection system of arbitration committee. 5) Institutionalization of arbitration judgment that prevent for claimant's avoidance by using a withdrawal and an intentional absent 6) A permission of the right of claimant's court custody directly before the begging of arbitration request for the prevention for destruction of evidence and property concealment 7) Grant of the arbitration tribunal's interim measures of protection for private property preservation to the third party, proof security, prevention from the loss that selling the corruptible goods 8) Improvement of arbitration's efficiency from the exclusion of the obstacles that are forgery, concealed evidence, and arbitrator's bribe taking Lastly, I hope that this study will serve to promote friendly economic relationship between China and South Korea and strive for international equilibrium through the achievement of China Arbitration's International Standardization. I will finish this paper with a firm belief that this will lead to more advanced studies.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.767-804
• /
• 2000

International network strategy is intended to examine the validity of existing network-centered theories in order to ascertain why small-and medium-sized enterprises are useful as a strategic correspondence to the internationalization trend. Small-and medium-sized enterprises can be estimated as being vital majorities in terms of their flexibility to meet changable conditions in international marketing compared with the conglomerates Therefore, their dependency on a few conglomerates for the international economy can be diverged. Generally, the successful internationalization of industries can be derived from the creation of suitable strategies for its competence and quality with the effective correction and completion of its strategy and tactics through mistakes. The internationalization strategy of small-and medium-sized enterprises should not be the reckless pursuit of internationalization that depends only on the increase of investment or the simple induction of the other conglomerates strategic models, but it should be accomplished through the evolution and practice of the concrete strategies that will be more proper for the enterprise's property and efficiency. The results of analyses with proof can be summarized with two effects in large in the process of internationalization of domestic small-and medium-sized enterprises. First, the capacity for internationalization of firms results from a long-term training procedure and continuous development of managing activities. Then in time this becomes an important element for the small-and medium-sized firms in terms with its position targeted international trading. However, the domestic enterprises are showing their abilities in the international competition in quantity, and trying to establish relationships between the enterprises through international networks. Second, statistics might not be meaningful in part because of the lack of data for analysis. It seems that more useful results will be derived from obtaining and utilizing sufficient information and from establishing an inter-relationship between the small-and medium-sized enterprises which are investing in foreign companies.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.314-325
• /
• 2013

Background: Stem cell research competition is accelerating globally since President Obama signed an executive order, repealing Bush-era policy that limited use of federal tax dollars for embryonic stem cell research. Methods: In this paper, we conducted a comparative analysis of stem cell research policy changes in three countries, including the Human Fertilisation Embryology Act (HFEA) of UK, executive order 13,505 (removing barriers to responsible scientific research involving human stem cells) of USA, and Bioethics and Safety Act of South Korea. Debates on stem cell research are based on conflicts of fundamental beliefs that exist in the supporting and opposing coalitions. We compared regional characteristics of the advocacy coalitions in three countries and presented various factors that might be related to the policy changes. Results: The UK government, parliament, and the HFEA have sought expert consultations and public opinions to establish guidelines. UK has made social consensus through continued discussion for a long time. US President's veto power was one strongest factors influencing policy. South Korean policy was influenced by public opinion and policy brokers. Also, South Korea has not made social consensus. UK had a strong leadership and strong adjustment of coalitions but US and South Korea had not. Dr. Hwang's scandal has had one of the greatest impacts on policy decision in South Korea. Conclusion: The power of public opinion was critical in all three countries. In particular, the influence of public opinion was noticeable in South Korea. Also it turned out that in US and South Korea, the presence of a policy broker who could pursue his or her goals was the most powerful factor among the advocacy coalition factors.