• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.51-73
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 한국과 일본의 현행 도덕교육 교육과정에 준거하여 발행된 초 중학교도덕 교과서에 나타난 등장인물의 성향과 서술내용을 비교 분석함으로써 양국의 도덕교육이 지향하는 인물상의 특징을 밝히는 데 그 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 먼저 양국의 도덕 교과서에 등장한 실존인물의 성향을 살펴보았다. 구체적으로는 출현시대 별 인물의 분포, 남녁성비와 내 외국인 분포, 그리고 직업 및 신분 별 인물의 분포를 각각 전체 백분율로 나타냄으로써 인물의 성향에 대한 양적 비교분석을 시도하였다. 나아가 등장인물의 인품이나 삶의 모습, 그리고 가르침 등에서 도출할 수 있는 도덕적 가치를 살펴보고, 가치 덕목 별 인물의 분포를 전체 백분율로 나타냄으로써 양국의 가치 덕목의 강조점을 밝히고자 하였다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.36-46
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to find out the influence of MBL Exhibition Class on the Elementary School students' academic achievement, scientific research abilities and affective characters. For the purpose, three classes were sampled in the 5th grade of an elementary school. Among the three classes, two were designated as the comparative classes consisted of 68 students and the other was the experimental class, 33 students. The comparative classes were given lessens according to the content presented in the textbook of 7th Education Curriculum and the experimental class was given re-built lessons with using MBL machines. Before and after giving lessons, students of both classes took a test for science academic achievement. And also the scientific research abilities and affective characters were examined. The conclusions from this study is as follows. First, according to the result of science academic achievement test after giving lessons, the mean of the experimental class was higher than that of the comparative classes meaningfully. Second, scientific research abilities of the experimental class was shown higher than that of the comparative classes meaningfully. Specially, basic research abilities were improved very meaningfully and only hypothesis-building ability was improved among integrated research abilities. Third, it doesn't seem that MBL exhibition class is effective on affective characters(interest, attitudes).

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.161-183
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 1997년 한국교육기본법과 2006 전면개정 일본교육기본법을 비교 교육 비교법 측면에서 비교분석한다. 두 법률을 그 문장론, 법개념과 법리, 교육철학과 교육풍토의 세 측면에서 비교하였다. 이러한 비교분석의 결과 다음과 같은 한 일 약국 교육기본법의 특징을 도출하고 있다. 첫째, 한국교육기본법은 교육당사자들을 권리 권능의 주체로 명시하나 일본교육기본법은 권리 권능의 주체에 대해 불분명하다. 둘째, 한국교육기본법은 시민적 권리와 법질서를 지향하나 일본교육기본법은 공법적 질서를 지향한다. 셋째, 한국교육기본법은 당사자주의 일본교육기본법은 직권주의를 지향한다. 넷째, 한국교육기본법은 교사수권 교육과정을 지향하나 일본교육기본법은 행정수권교육과 정을 지향한다. 다섯째, 학교의 공공성을 한국교육기본법은 공식교육과정으로 예상하나 일본교육기본법은 국가독점성으로 상정한다. 여섯째, 한국교육기본법은 교직 전문직관에 기초해 있으나 일본교육기본법은 교직 성직관에 입각해 있다. 일곱째, 한국교육기본법은 종교적으로 세속화된 교육을 지향하나 일본교육기본법은 일본 전통종교와 조화된 교육을 지향한다. 여덟째, 한국교육기본법은 발전도상 시기의 발전교육관을 유지하고 있으나 일본교육기본법은 지속가능발전교육을 강조한다. 종합적으로 볼 때 한국교육기본법은 시민적 교육법제를 위한 기본법을 지향하며 일본교육기본법 공법적 교육법제를 지향하고 있다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2003

Total quality management (TQM) is regarded as a tool for improving the competitiveness not only for a manufacturing sector, but also for a service sector, The objective of this paper is to classify TQM education by management level, to identify how TQM education be implemented by the type of industry, to analyze the relationship of TQM education with business performance, and finally to analyze the difference between companies with ISO certification and those without ISO certification in terms of TQM education. The findings suggest that there was a significant difference between manufacturing and service sector in TQM education level. Also, the relationship of TQM education with business performance was partially correlated. Finally there was no significant difference between companies with ISO certification and those without ISO certification in terms of TQM education.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.217-225
• /
• 2019

In this paper, we proposed comparison of software education units according to 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Comparative analysis of 6 Practical Arts textbooks was conducted especially on the software education units. The analysis criteria were decided to be unit system, unit structure, learning objectives, the way of placing contents, activities, supporting materials, providing resources, and evaluation. As a result, the software education units have secured a lot of quantity compared to the total number of units. And the affective domain of the learning objectives is shown to be lacking. All the textbooks were uniformly arranged the component of contents described in 2015 revised national curriculum. Cooperative activities are strengthened compared to the previouse curriculum. On the other hand, evaluations have a large variation among textbooks and some have fewer types.

• 한국동물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국동물학회 1996년도 한국생물과학협회 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.269.2-269
• /
• 1996

No Abstract, See Full Text

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.145-152
• /
• 2016

In this paper, we propose a comparative study of Informatics subject curriculums and textbooks in middle school between Korea and England because both countries have similar national curriculums about software education which has computational thinking as objectives of education and good-qualified textbooks for teachers and students. we looked through the Informatics and Computing curriculums and textbook of both countries in order to give good reference case to Informatics textbook manufacturer. In addition, we verified the validity of this study through FGI. The results of this study will be a good case study about designing Informatics curriculum and making Informatics textbooks in middle school.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.181-189
• /
• 2016

This study examined three elementary school computing curriculum - the CSTA K-12 computer science standards, the computing programme of the national curriculum in England, and the 2015 national curriculum in Korea - focusing on the educational objectives with the perspective of the revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The CSTA K-12 computer science standards mainly addressed applying procedural knowledge and using digital technology is the main theme. The computing programme in England concentrated on understanding factual and conceptual knowledge of computer science, such as algorithms. The 2015 national curriculum also addressed applying procedural knowledge, but the main focus is making softwares and robots. The findings of this comparative analysis suggest that it is needed to set up concrete educational objectives for lower grade and make them related to the secondary education to make more coherent elementary-level learning objectives. And elementary-level computing learning objectives are needed to be organized with the perspective of knowledge and cognitive process level.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.3-39
• /
• 2005

Korea and Japan have been making a continuous effort to build information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure in schools, and integrate ICT into curriculum by training teachers based on own ICT policies in education. ICT policy in education isparticularly diverse and challenging, in part because the rapid development of ICT continues to create new possibilities for use and demands the transformation of the ways we teach and learn. The present study is to analyze ICT policies of Korea and Japan, between 1980's and the present period, in a larger educational and historical context. The study reviews chronological changes in major streamlines of ICT policies of both countries, and discusses in detail changes in two aspects of ICT policies in education, that is, ICT infrastructure and teacher training. The paper points out convergence and diversity of ICT policies in two countries and concludes with a set of guidelines for ICT policy makers.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.427-440
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to develop a science writing teaching strategy, and to apply it to the fourth-graders in elementary science classes. We examined its effect on their motivation, attitude, and understanding of science concept. For the research fourth grade children were grouped into three classes: an experimental class A of 27 children, an experimental class B of 24 and a comparative class of 27. All of them are from H elementary school in Seoul, Korea. Experimental class A learned science writing with a newly developed strategy while experimental class B learned science writing in a traditional method. Comparative class did not learn science writing. As a result, class A showed positive changes on students' science motivation, attitude, and understanding of science concept. In addition, class B with even one science writing task for a chapter had higher achievement in the understanding of science concept than the comparative class had.