• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.923-926
• /
• 2012

The aim of this study was to investigate the early outcome of Endostar combined with chemoradiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer. Fifty-two cases (FIGO IIb to IVa) were divided randomly into two groups, receiving chemoradiotherapy alone (CRT group) and Endostar combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT+E group). For the patients in the CRT+E group, Endostar was administered daily with the dosage of 7.5 $mg/m^2$, and cisplatin was administered weekly with the dosage of 20 $mg/m^2$ during the radiation. The regimens lasted for 4 weeks with no difference in chemoradiotherapy between the two groups. The early outcome complete remission rate was 73.1%, partial remission rate was 23.1% and the total response rate was 96.2% in CRT+E group, a significant improvement on the 34.6%, 42.3% and 76.9%, respectively, in the CRT group. One year survive rates were 100% and 84.6% in the CRT+E group and CRT groups, the difference being significant. Endostar combined with chemoradiotherapy can improve the early outcome of the advanced cervical cancer, and adverse effects were not encountered.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권12호
• /
• pp.7395-7400
• /
• 2013

Objective: The long-term efficacy of microwave hyperthermia combined with chemoradiotherapy in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with metastatic foci in cervical lymph nodes was evaluated. Methods: A total of 154 cases of N2 or N3 stage NPC were randomized into two groups: hyperthermia group (76 cases) and control group (78 cases). Both received cisplatin chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In addition, the hyperthermia group further received microwave hyperthermia to the metastatic cervical nodes with different patterns (before or after radiotherapy), heating temperatures (T90< $43^{\circ}C$ and $T90{\geq}43^{\circ}C$) and hyperthermia episodes (< 4 times, 4-10 times and > 10 times). Results: The 3-month and 5-year complete response (CR) rates of cervical lymph nodes in the hyperthermia group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and the 3-year / 5-year overall survival rate in the hyperthermia group were also significantly higher. There was no significant difference in 5-year metastatic rates. In the hyperthermia group, the 3-month and 5-year CR rates of T90< $43^{\circ}C$ treatment were significantly lower than with $T90{\geq}43^{\circ}C$ treatment. The CR rate was highest when the hyperthermia was performed 4-10 times. There were no significant differences in 3-month and 5-year CR rates between hyperthermia before or after radiotherapy treatment. Conclusion: Microwave hyperthermia combined with chemoradiotherapy can increase local control, DFS and 3, 5-year overall survival rates of patients with N2 ~ N3 stage NPC. The heating temperature should be over $43^{\circ}C$ with hyperthermia repeated 4-10 times.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.99-107
• /
• 1994

Among the 63 patients with histopathologically proven primary squamous cell anal cancer who were managed in Presbyterian Medical Center and Yonsei University Cancer from Jan. 1971 to Dec. 1991, 34 patients, who were managed with surgery alone(abdominoperineal resection) or post-operative radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were analysed. With mean follow up time of 81.3 months, 30 Patients(88$ \% $) were followed up from 17 to 243 months. In methods, 10 patients were treated with surgery alone. 9 Patients were treated with combined surgery and postoperative radiotherapy(50$\∼$60 Gy in 28$\∼$30 fractions). 15 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy (Mitomycin C 15 mg/squ, bolus injection day 1;5-FU, 750 mg/squ, 24hr infusion, day 1 to 5) and radiotherapy started the same day. A dose of 30 Gy was given to the tumor and to the pelvis including inguinal nodes, in 15 fractions. After 2 weeks a boost of radiotherapy(20 Gy) to the ano-perineal area and second cycle of chemotherapy completed the treatment. The overall 5-year survival rate was 56.2$ \% $. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy group was 70$ \% $ and surgery alone group was 16.7$ \% $. According to the cox proportional harzard model, there was significant difference between survival with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and surgery alone(p=0.0129), but post-operative radiotherapy was 64.8$ \% $, which was not stastically significant(p=0.1412). In concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, the anal funtion Preservation rate was 87$ \% $ and the severe complication rate(grade 3 stenosis and incontinence) was 13.3$ \% $. In conclusion, we conclude that the concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be effective treatment modality in patients with anal cancer.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.233-241
• /
• 1995

Purpose : To analyse clinical outcome and prognostic factors according to treatment modality, this paper report our experience of retrospective study of patients with esophageal cancer Materials and Methods : One hundred and ten patients with primary esophageal cancer who were treated in Presbyterian Medical Center from May 1985 to December 1992. We analysed these patients retrospectively with median follow up time of 28 months, one hundred and four patients($95{\%}$) were followed up from 15 to 69 months. In methods, twenty-eight patients were treated with median radiation dose irradiated 54.3Gy only. Fifty-six patients were treated with combined chemoradiotherapy. Sixteen cases of these patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation and the other patients(forty cases) were treated sequential chemoradiotherapy. In concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, patients received 5-FU continuous IV infusion for 4 days. Cisplatin IV bolus. and concurrent esophageal irradiation to 30 Gy. After that patients received 5-FU continuous IV, Cisplatin bolus injection and Mitomycin-C bolus IV, Bleomycin continuous IV, and irradiation to 20 Gy. In sequential chemoradiotherapy group, the chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU 1,000mg/$m^2$ administered as a continuous 24 hour intravenous infusion during five days and Cisplatin 80-100mg/$m^2$ bolus injected, or Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Cisplatin, Methotrexate were used of 1 or 2 cycles. After preoperative concurrentm chemoradiation twenty-six patients underwent radical esophagectomy. Results : Ninety-three patients could be examined for response assessment, By treatment modality, response rates were $85.1{\%}$ for radiation alone group and $86.3{\%}$ for combined chemoradiation group. But in operation group, after one cycle of concurrent chemoradiation treatment, response rate was $61.9{\%}$. The pathologic complete response were $15.4{\%}$ in operation group. Overall median survival was II months and actuarial 5-year survival rate was $8{\%}$. The median survival interval was 6 months for radiation alone group, 11 months for combined chemoradiation group and 19 months for operation group. And also median survival was 19 months for complete responder group that 8 months for noncomplete responder group. In univariative analysis, statistically significant prognostic factors were tumor size, clinical stage, tumor response, and operation. In multivariative analysis, significantly better survival was associated with clinical stage, tumor response, radiation dose, and operation. Conclusion : Compared with radiotherapy alone, combined multimodality may improve the median survival in patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus and toxicity is acceptable.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권9호
• /
• pp.3913-3916
• /
• 2015

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of mannatide combined with sodium cantharidate vitamin B6 in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Materials and Methods: Data for 69 patients with malignant pleural effusions who did not receive systemic chemotherapy were collected. Injection into the thorax using mannatide combined with sodium cantharidate vitamin B6 was performed for 37 patients in the experimental group and mannatide combined with cisplatin for 32 patients in the control group. Objective responses, KPS (Karnofsky Scoring) and incidences of side effects between the two groups were compared. Results: 13 patients reached CR (complete response) and 11 PR (partial response) in the experimental group, while 12 patients reached CR and 9 PR in the control group, the difference in overall objective responses between the two groups not being significant (66.7% vs 63.6%, p=0.806). However, improvement of KPS in the experimental group wasgreater than in the control group; total side-effect incidences during the period of treatment were 22.2% (8/36) and 54.5% (18/33), respectively (p=0.006). Conclusions: Regimen of mannatide combined with sodium cantharidate vitamin B6 had better improvement in quality-of-life and symptom relief, with a lower side-effect incidence in treatment of malignant pleural effusions.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.103-106
• /
• 2000

Advanced esophageal carcinoma which invades into adjacent organs are classified as T4 esophageal cancer,. Its complete resection without residual tumor would be difficult. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and combined modality therapy are being tried to improve survival in patients with T4 esophageal carcinoma. In a 74-year-old man a 6cm squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with invasion of the thoracic aorta was detected (T4). After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy the patient was operated on using bio-pump with aorto-femoral cannulation. The invased segment of descending aorta was resected and reconstructed with a graft. The tumor was resected and EG anastomosis was done. The postoperative period was uneventful the patient was discharged after good condition and has been well to now.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.35-41
• /
• 1998

배경 : 직장암에서 근치적 절제술을 시행한 후에 병리소견상 장막을 침범하였거나 임파절 전이가 있는 경우에 수술 후 방사선 치료와 항암화학요법을 시행하는 것이 국소재발을 억제하고 생존율을 높일 수 있는 것으로 알려져 있다. 연세암센타에서도 수술 후 국소 진행성 병변이거나 임파절 전이가 있는 경우에 5-FU와 Leucovorin을 방사선 치료와 같이 사용하여 왔으며, 그 치료 결과를 방사선 치료 단독군과 비교 고찰하여 방사선치료와 항암화학요법 병용치료의 효과를 평가해 보았다. 대상 및 방법 : 1989년 10월부터 1994년 5월까지 연세암센타에 내원하여 방사선치료를 받았던 142 명의 환자들을 대상으로 하였고, 방사선 단독치료군은 69명, 방사선 항암화학요법 병용치료군은 73명이었다. 대상환자를 살펴보면 병기는 방사선 단독치료군과 병용치료군에서 B2가 24예($35.3\%$)와 24예($32.9\%$), B3가 2예($2.9\%$)와 3예($4.1\%$), Cl이 1예($1.5\%$)와 4예($5.5\%$), C2가 33예($48.5\%$)와 36예($49.3\%$), C3가 8예($11.8\%$)와 6예($8.2\%$)로 방사선 단독치료군과 항암제 방사선 병용치료군의 Modified Astler-Coller 병기는 대등한 분포를 보였다. 수술 후 치료로 방사선 단독치료군은 골반강에 4500cGy를 조사후 원발부위에 540-1600cGy의 축소조사를 시행하여 총 4500-6040cGy를 조사하였고(중앙값 5400cGy), 병용치료군은 수술 후 1-2개월에 5-FU을 단독으로(평균 494.8$mg/m^2$, 13예) 또는 5-FU와 Leucovorin을 함께(5-FU 393.9$mg/m^2$, Leucovorin 20$mg/m^2$, 60예) 5일씩 4주 간격으로 2차례 시행한 후, 9주째에 방사선 치료를 시작하고 방사선치료 첫 주와 5주의 방사선치료시작일에 각각 3일간 3차, 4차 항암제를 같은 양으로 병합시행하근 그 후 4주간격으로 시행하여 총3-12차례에 걸쳐 항암화학요법을 시행하였다. 방사선치료는 골반강에 4500cGy를 조사 후 축소조사하여 총 4500-5040cGy를 조사하였다(중앙값 5040cGy). 추적관찰기간은 3-81개월로 중앙값이 38개월이었다. 결과 : 5년 생존율은 방사선 단독치료군과 병용치료군에서 각각 $60.1\%,\;66.3\%$로 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았고(p=0.39), 5년 무병생존율도 각각 $54.2\%,\;65.5\%$로 병용치료군에서 약간 높았으나 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 보이지 못했다(p=0.18). 원격전이없는 생존율도 $55.2\%$와 $68.6\%$로 유의한 차이는 없었다(p=0.12). 그러나 5년 국소제어생존율은 단독치료군 $50.3\%$, 병용치료군 $65.8\%$로 병용치료군에서 높은것으로 나타났다(p=0.04). 결론 : 수술 후 국소재발억제와 원격전이를 줄여 무병생존율과 생존율을 높이기 위해 시행한 항암제 방사선 병용치료는 수술후 방사선치료 단독시행한 치료군보다 국소제어율을 높여주는 것을 알 수 있었으나($50.3\%\;vs.\;65.8\%,\;p=0.04$), 원격전이에는 영향을 주지 못하여 무병생존율이나 생존율에 유의한 차이를 보이지 못하였다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권7호
• /
• pp.3511-3514
• /
• 2016

Purpose: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or combined chemotherapy together with radiotherapy (CMT-RT) without surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 84 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (stage II or III) between January $1^{st}$, 2003 and December $31^{st}$, 2013 were enrolled, 48 treated with preoperative CCRT (Gr.I) and 36 with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CMT-RT) without surgery (Gr.II). The chemotherapeutic agents used concurrent with radiotherapy were either 5-fluorouracil short infusion plus leucovorin and/or capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil infusion alone. All patients received pelvic irradiation. Results: There were 5 patients (10.4%) with a complete pathological response. The 3 year-overall survival rates were 83.2% in Gr.I and 24.8 % in Gr.II (p<0.01). The respective 5 year-overall survival rates were 70.3% and 0% (p<0.01). The 5 year-overall survival rates in Gr.I for patients who received surgery within 56 days after complete CCRT as compared to more than 56 days were 69.5% and 65.1% (p=0.91). Preoperative CCRT used for 12 of 30 patients in Gr.I (40%) with lower rectal cancer demonstrated that in preoperative CCRT a sphincter sparing procedure can be performed. Conclusions: The results of treatment with preoperative CCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer showed comparable rates of overall survival and sphincter sparing procedures as compared to previous studies.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.237-242
• /
• 2006

목 적: 국소적으로 진행된 비소세포성 폐암에서 예후영향인자를 찾기 위하여 근치적 방사선 치료에 대한 성적을 후향적으로 평가하였다. 대상 및 방법: $1991{\sim}2002$년에 걸쳐 본원에서 방사선치료를 받은 stage IIIB 비소세포성 폐암 환자 216명의 의무기록을 후향적으로 분석하였다. 완전관해와 부분관해를 반응군(response group), 불변 및 진행성질환을 무반응군(non-response group)으로 묶어 분류하였다. 결 과: 근치목적의 방사선치료를 시행한 총 140명의 환자 중 방사선단독치료를 받은 환자는 68명, 항암화학제와 병용요법을 시행한 환자는 72명이었다. 계획된 방사선치료가 완료된 것은 단독에서는 30예, 병용요법에서는 39예였다. 중앙생존기간은 방사선 단독치료군에서는 4.6개월, 병용요법군에서는 9.9개월이었다. 1년, 2년 및 3년 생존율이 방사선 단독치료군에서는 13.3%, 3.3%, 0%였으며, 항암화학제 병용요법군에서는 각각 35.9%, 20.5%, 15.4%였다(p<0.001). 반응군에서 방사선 단독으로 치료한 환자는 중앙생존기간 7.2개월, 항암화학제 병용치료환자는 16.5개월이었고, 무반응군에서 단독치료 환자는 4.4개월, 병용치료환자는 6.7개월이었다(p=0.001). 치료반응과 항암화학요법의 병용이 전체생존율에 영향을 주었다(p<0.001). Grade 3 이상의 심한 합병증은 방사선 단독요법에서 2예(6.7%), 항암화학 병용요법에서 7예(17.9%)였다. 결 론: Stage IIIB 비소세포성 폐암에서 방사선치료와 더불어 항암화학치료를 병용했을 때, 방사선단독요법에 비해 치료반응률과 생존율이 더 높았다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.1463-1469
• /
• 2015

Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma to identify the best method of treatment. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixteen patients with esophageal carcinoma aged 70 and older who received definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy entered the study. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and treatment-related toxicities were assessed. Results: The median OS of the overall population was 17.9 months. For patients treated with cCRT, sCRT and radiotherapy alone, the median OS was 22.3 months, 18.0 months and 12.4 months respectively(P=0.044). Median OS for patients treated with radiotherapy dose ${\geq}60Gy$ and <60Gy was 20.2 months and 10.9 months respectively (p=0.017). By univariate analysis, Chemoradiotherapy (include cCRT and sCRT) and radiotherapy dose ${\geq}60Gy$ were found to achieve higher survival rates compared with radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy dose <60Gy (P=0.015, P=0.017). By multivariate analysis, chemoradiotherapy (HR=1.645, P=0.022) and radiotherapy dose ${\geq}60Gy$ (HR=1.642, P=0.025) were identified as independent prognostic factors of OS. Conclusions: Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy could be considered as a feasible and effective treatment in esophageal carcinoma patients aged 70 and older. Radiotherapy dose 60Gy is an effective treatment option compared with standard dose radiotherapy, while higher doses are not beneficial to improve survival.