• 자원리싸이클링
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.69-74
• /
• 2014

심해저 망간단괴를 용융환원 제련시 발생된 슬래그에 규사와 cokes를 일정량 배합하여 아크로에서 재용융하여 Fe-Si-Mn 합금철을 제조하는 과정에서 발생하는 2차 슬래그는 아직 특정 용도가 개발되지 않은 폐슬래그로 취급되는데, 이 폐슬래그의 재활용 방안에 대하여 요업 원료로의 활용가능성과 건설재료로의 활용가능성을 검토하였다. 망간단괴 폐슬래그를 포틀랜드시멘트, 캐스타블내화물과 같은 요업원료로 사용하는 것은 조성 차이가 많아서 직접적인 활용이 곤란하고, 다른 활용방법으로서 폐슬래그를 도로 노반재나 성토재 및 복토재 등과 같은 건설재료로 활용하는 것이 무난하다고 판단된다. 도로 건설재료로 사용시 혹시 있을지도 모를 토양 오염에 대비하여 유해물질들에 대한 용출시험을 KS 기준에 따라 수행한 결과 폐슬래그의 무해성을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서, 망간단괴 폐슬래그를 도로 성토재나 노반재와 같은 건설재료로 활용하는 방안을 제안코자 한다.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.235-237
• /
• 2001

;Dentistry has benefited from tremendous advances in technology with the introduction of new techniques and materials, and patients are aware that esthetic approaches in dentistry can change one's appearance. Increasingly. tooth-colored restorative materials have been used for restoration of posterior teeth. Tooth-colored restoration for posterior teeth can be divided into three categories: 1) the direct techniques that can be made in a single appointment and are an intraoral procedure utilizing composites: 2) the semidirect techniques that require both an intraoral and an extraoral procedure and are luted chairside utilizing composites: and 3) the indirect techniques that require several appointments and the expertise of a dental technician working with either composites or ceramics. But, resin restoration has inherent drawbacks of microleakage. polymerization shrinkage, thermal cycling problems. and wear in stress-bearing areas. On the other hand, Ceramic restorations have many advantages over resin restorations. Ceramic inlays are reported to have less leakage than resin restoration and to fit better. although marginal fidelity depends on technique and is laboratory dependent. Adhesion of luting resin is more reliable and durable to etched ceramic material than to treated resin composite. In view of color matching, periodontal health. resistance to abrasion, ceramic restoration is superior to resin restorationl. Materials which have been used for the fabrication of ceramic restorations are various. Conventional powder slurry ceramics are also available. Castable ceramics are produced by centrifugal casting of heat-treated glass ceramics. and machinable ceramics are feldspathic porcelains or cast glass ceramics which are milled using a CAD/CAM apparatus to produce inlays (for example, Cered. They may also be copy milled using the Celay apparatus. Pressable ceramics are produced from feldspathic porcelain which is supplied in ingot form and heated and moulded under pressure to produce a restoration. Infiltrated ceramics are another class of material which are available for use as ceramic inlays. An example is $In-Ceram^{\circledR}$(Vident. California, USA) which consists of a porous aluminum oxide or spinell core infiltrated with glass and subsequently veneered with feldspathic porcelain. In the 1980s. the development of compatible refractory materials made fabrication easier. and the development of adhesive resin cements greatly improved clinical success rates. This case report presents esthetic ceramic inlays for posterior teeth.teeth.