• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제1권
• /
• pp.163-191
• /
• 1989

The accident of the midair collision, passengers' falling or goods' dropping occurs or supersonic aircraft make a sonic boom during their conveying passengers or goods to the destination. The accident in transmit damages the their parties on the surface or their properties. In these cases, the third parties who were harmed to their lives or properties have the right to claim damages against the air carrier who caused them. These matters have become one of the important things since aircraft conveyed passengers and goods. Therefore, it is a great concern to settle these matters by law. But the Safety of the present aircraft has been much increased and the aircraft have become larger in size. Its flight altitude became higher than before. So the relationship of the aircraft to the third parties is much different from that of the earlier aircraft. The air transport is now indispensable to our life. It is not so easy to control these matters. In the early part of 20th century, when the third parties suffered the damage, many European countries made laws on the basis of the principle of liability without fault. But each country had a variety of its own law, and different kinds of difficulties have been brought about. Accordingly, the Rome Convention on Surface Damage (1933, 1952, 1978) has been made and revised. In spite of being revised, it contains many problems, and is not carried into effect world-wide. On the other hand, there are no regulations about the compensation of the third parties damaged in Korean existing laws. In case the damage is brought about to them, it is obviously true that the settlement of the liability of compensation for damage should be made by the general principle on the tort in domestic laws. At this point, it is urgent that we make a special law though the domestic legislation as a preliminary measure before we sign the international convention to save third damaged. It is desirable that we should, for the responsibility of the air carriage for the demage of the third parties on the surface, bring in the theory of the absolute liability in view of the legislation of many conutries. As the aircraft fly in the sky, their flight always contains some danger. It is very difficult to prove the fault, and the operator should suffer the principle of liability without fault or the similiar one. In case the liability without fault will be imposed upon the operator for the damage of the third parties, it is necessary to bring in the liability protection system for the protection and up upbringing of the air carriage. The Burden of danger of the air carriage will be reduced by introducing the system. A domestic legislation measure should be necessarily taken as soon as possible as a legal security measure on these matters.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.111-118
• /
• 2009

교통사고 발생은 도로 여건이나 운전자 의식 등의 문제로 발생할 수 있으나 운전자 상호간 또는 운전자와 보행자 사이의 지켜야할 사항을 규정하는 교통법규를 위반할 경우 차량 또는 보행자의 교통사고 노출 가능성이 높아져 교통사고로 이어지는 경우도 상당부분 발생한다. 따라서 교통안전 선진국에서는 이러한 메커니즘의 교통법규 준수율을 높이기 위해서 교통법규를 위반하는 운전자들이 경제적으로 부담을 느껴 "교통법규 준수"라는 행동을 선택할 수 있을 정도의 수준으로 교통법규 위반 범칙금을 책정하고 있으며, 경제가 발전 할수록 범칙금 수준도 향상 시키고 있는 실정이다. 반면, 우리나라는 국민 정서 문제를 앞세워 지난 20년간 교통법규 위반 범칙금 수준을 크게 향상시키지 않았다. 따라서 본 연구는 운전자의 교통법규 준수율을 높일 수 있는 방안에 대하여 경제논리를 적용하여 효율적 교통법규 위반 범칙금 수준을 책정하는 방안을 도출하였다. 속도위반 및 신호위반 등 교통사고와 연관성이 높은 교통법규 사항에 대하여 운전자의 "법규 위반" 또는 "법규 준수"의 행동 선택에 있어서의 기대효용을 수치화 하여 현재 운전자가 기대하는 "교통법규 위반시 단속기대 확률"을 유지할 경우 적정 범칙금 수준과 현재의 범칙금 수준을 유지할 경우 "효율적 단속기대 확률" 등 두 가지의 교통정책 방안을 제시하였다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.209-236
• /
• 2013

The concept of expectation rights considers 'the expectation' that the patient should be given proper medical treatment as the benefit and protection of the law, so it would be the benefit and protection of the law due to personal rights different from 'the legal principle that has the possibility to a considerable extent' being in an extension of life and body. However, the problem how the patient's expectation of medical service sets up in order to make it the benefit and protection of the law would be still left in the vague concept of the patient's 'expectation', thus, in the first place, the medical practice following formed medical standard in every particular medical institutes should be the standard because these medical services are normally within a range of the patients' expectations. In addition, it should be naturally constituted as mental profit to get the subjective circumstances such as 'the patient's expectation' to be an object, and also, different from the profit and protection of the law such as life and body that should be absolutely protected, the origin of violation behavior should be regarded simultaneously to define the denotation of expectation rights. Therefore, the expectation rights violations would be problematic in case it fails to reach the medical standard that is expected for common doctors to practice properly. This is the concept of expectation rights that gets subjective matters such as the patient's expectation to be objectivity as medical practices that can be expected by generalized abstract doctors. This standard should be defined as the minimum standard that is naturally expected for doctors to practice, different from medical standard that decides the level of doctors.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.67-100
• /
• 2017

항공산업이 비약적으로 발달을 함에 따라, 항공기사고의 위험성도 커지고 있다. 본 논문에서는 항공기사고의 인적요인 중 하나인 항공교통관제사 불법행위를 중심으로 다루었다. 현재 우리나라의 법령상 항공교통관제사의 불법행위 대한 책임을 규정한 명문은 없다. 따라서 국가공무원으로서의 항공교통관제사의 법적책임에 대하여 헌법제 29조1항과 국가배상법의 적용 여부를 살펴보았다. 실제로 우리나라는 항공사고의 원인이 항공관제사 과실에 의한 것이라는 유일한 판례가 1971년에 선고된 이후, 항공사고조사결과 관제사의 과실이 사고의 주요요인이었다고 함에도 불구하고 추가판례가 없는 상황이다. 본 논문은 항공사고에 있어서 관제사와 조종사간 요인 뿐만 아니라, 관제사에 대한 실제로 법령의 적용가능성을 해외사례를 통해 살펴보았다. 항공교통관제라는 특수한 업무가 고강도의 업무스트레스를 갖는 업무라 할지라도, 항공교통관제의 최종목적인 항공기의 안전한 운항을 책임지고 있는 전문가로서 항공기사고의 원인이 되었다면, 그에 따른 법적 책임은 져야 한다는 내용을 다루었다.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.147-159
• /
• 2023

기후변화로 인하여 해수면 상승이 발생하고 있고, 그로 인한 악영향에 대해 연안국을 비롯한 국제사회의 우려가 커지고 있다. 해수면 상승으로 해안선이 후퇴하고 섬등 해양지형물이 수몰되는 경우 그러한 해안선을 기점으로 설정된 연안국 관할해역 외측한계의 변경 가능성, 기존 해양경계획정조약의 개정 필요성, 섬 또는 암석이 암석 또는 수중암초로 변경됨에 따른 법적 지위의 변화 등 많은 국제해양법적 쟁점을 발생시키고 있다. 이 논문에서는 해수면 상승이 국제해양법에 미치는 효과에 한정하여, 쟁점별로 소도서개발도상국, 세계국제법학회, 유엔 국제법위원회의 주장을 검토하고 유엔해양법협약의 해석론적 측면에서 해결방안을 제시하였다.

• ESCO지
• /
• 통권80호
• /
• pp.46-53
• /
• 2013

ESCO에 대한 구체적인 판례를 통해 각 쟁점에 대해 분석해본다. 또한 중국과 동남아 등 ESCO시장 진출관련 법률 환경을 분석해보고, 이에 대한 해외 진출 전략을 제시해보고자 한다.

• ESCO지
• /
• 통권79호
• /
• pp.44-51
• /
• 2012

분석대상 판례 대부분의 민사 분쟁은 아파트(입주자 대표회의) 관련 사례이며, 형사판례의 경우 사기 등 관련 사례가 대부분이다. 이에 대한 구체적인 판례를 통해 각 쟁점에 대해 분석해보고자 한다.

• 해양환경안전학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 해양환경안전학회 2017년도 추계학술발표회
• /
• pp.281-281
• /
• 2017

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제38권
• /
• pp.3-45
• /
• 2008

A motive and aim of enactment of UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communication in Int'l Contracts is based on need to eliminate legal obstacles that might arise under existing int'l trade law instruments and promote int'l electronic commercial transaction. But when it is used with related articles, 14, 15, 16, 17 for offer under CISG, one of the most successful conventions which produces substantive law for the unification of int'l trade, questions of practical importance, for example possibilities of withdrawal, revocation, rejection of offer, the extent of its criteria arise from therewith. In conclusion, a effective electronic offer has to assure easily access and confirmation of trade terms besides criteria of offer under CISG. An offer can be withdrawal, if electronic message of withdrawal has entered the offeree's server before or at the same time when the offer has reached the offeree but agreement expressly or impliedly, between the parties about type, format, email address is a prerequisited. Implied consent could be presumed through prior conduct or trade usages between the parties under CISG articles 8, 9. The term "have reached" correspond to the time which is able to retrieve the electronic message of withdrawal. But without express or implied agreement between them about electronic communication of type, format, email address, an offer can be withdrawal before or at the same time when it has entered offeree's other e-mail address and confirmed by his retrieval. In case of the revocation, electronic message of the revocation is effective before the offeree's dispatching an acceptance. A prerequisite for the revocation by electronic communication is came as the above mentioned withdrawal except for concept of a time difference for reach. In case of a rejection of offer, when a rejection by electronic communication has entered the offeror's server, an offer is ended. But a prerequisite for the rejection by electronic message is same as the above mentioned withdrawal and revocation.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.41-65
• /
• 2010

It is a matter for debate that which types of dispute may be resolved by arbitration. This problem is concerning the arbitrability of the subject-matter of a dispute. National laws establish the domain of arbitration. Each state decides which matters may or may not be resolved by arbitration in accordance with its own political, social and economic policy. In response to complexity and diversity of a social phenomenon, the dispute also is various, therefore can not be settled efficiently by means of court adjudication to which applies a law strictly. To overcome such problems we are going to seek to make use of arbitration. According to Korean Arbitration Act Art. 3 (1), any dispute in private laws would be the object of arbitral proceedings. For the promotion of fair and free competition, it is increasingly wide-ranging antitrust legislation across the world. It is matter for debate what can an arbitral tribunal do when confronted with an allegation that the contract under which the arbitration is brought is itself an illegal restraint of trade or in some other way a breach of antitrust law. The underlying question is how to accommodate the conflicting congressional policies favoring resolution of private controversies by arbitration and encouraging private suits to protect the public interests served by the antitrust laws. It is necessary to inquire into the arbitrability of antitrust issues on case-by-case basis, because the types of them are quite diverse. If antitrust issues are the dispute in private laws and the contracting parties agreed to submit to arbitration disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in the antitrust issues, the antitrust disputes are arbitrable. Not only international antitrust disputes but also domestic antitrust disputes are capable of being resolved by arbitration. When the public interests in the enforcement of antitrust legislation are asserted, it is possible to justify the annulment or the refusal of the recognition or the enforcement of an arbitral award that ignores public policy as a matter of it.