• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.32-39
• /
• 2007

Air Transportation industry becomes more competitive that the restriction on new access to market were eased and relaxed. Liberalization of international air transport will continue, via bilateral and multilateral process. Korea, Japan, and China have expanded enormously the economic trade and cultural exchange bilaterally in the Northeast Asia, they are acknowledging the importance and necessity of improved connection, it order to face effectively other regional blocks of US-Canada, NAFTA, ASEAN, CLMV. In particular, nobody denies that it is urgent to liberalize bilaterally the air transport in Northeast Asia for promoting reciprocal benefits and prosperity. Recently while open skies bilateral agreements was signed between Korea-China in June, 2006. The agreements processes are too heavily influenced by flag carriers; leading to capacity/market sharing between the bilateral carriers in most markets, against the interest of consumers and overall economic interest of the nation. For successful operation of Northeast Air Market, it is need to set up development strategy paradigm by creating cross-border sub-regional (Northeast Asian) open skies bloc as well as preparing and creating of LCCs operations.

• 동남아시아연구
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.35-79
• /
• 2014

This study examines the measures for the activation and the growth of intra-regional trade in Southeast Asia taking a look at the four dimensions of tariff rates, non-tariff barriers, trade facilitations, and trade infrastructures. Utilizing a gravity model, we performed empirical analysis and discussed the policy implications with the priorities to implement. To expand the intra-regional trade in Southeast Asia it would be necessary to enhance the level of trade facilitations and provide trade infrastructures, such as ports and airports as well as cutting the tariff rates and eliminating the non-trade barriers. In particular, in the case of exports of ASEAN6 to ASEAN6 the infrastructure is the important factor. Also, in the case of the exports of ASEAN6 to CLMV(Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam), it is expected that eliminating non-tariff barriers and enhancing trade facilitations may play important roles in the progress of intra-regional trade. These results may provide the important implications for Southeast Asian countries, which are trying to promote intra-regional trade ahead of the constitution of ASEAN Economic Community by 2015. Southeast Asian countries could be evaluated to achieve a certain level of trade liberalization and economic integration through the formation of AFTA. But in order for Southeast Asia to develop to advanced economic integrated region it requires mutual cooperations and policy harmonizations among regional countries. Also, for the elimination of non-tariff barriers, promoting trade facilitations, and providing infrastructures, the administrative, legal, and institutional measures would have to be fulfilled in advance. In addition, capital investment for constructing infrastructures would be necessary to realize the intra-regional trade expansion. However, to achieve the goal, it would require a large capital investment and highly mandated policy considerations and harmonizations among Southeast Asian countries in terms of further trade liberalization and economic integration.

• 동남아시아연구
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.117-159
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 1995년부터 1999년까지 진행된 아세안 회원국 확대 과정의 추동 요인을 가입 희망국을 중심으로 분석하였다. 주요 연구 질문은 지역협력체 가입을 희망하는 국가들의 가입 결정 시기의 차이는 어떻게 설명할 수 있는가이다. 본 연구는 아세안 창설 초기 아세안에 가입하지 않았던 국가들이 왜 1990년대 중반 이후 가입을 했는지, 그리고 냉전 종식 이후 왜 각기 다른 시기에 가입을 했는지, 그 시기적 차이에 대해 주목하고 있다. 이를 위해 베트남, 라오스, 미얀마, 캄보디아의 가입 과정을 비교 분석하였다. 연구의 주요 주장은 아세안 가입의 시기적 차이는 존재하지만 궁극적으로 체제 유지와 같은 정당성 확보를 위해 지역협력체를 활용했다는 것이다. 무엇보다 지역협력체 확대에 대한 기존연구들은 국제체제 변화와 같은 거시적 측면에서 지역협력체 확대를 논의하고 있는 반면 본 연구는 개별회원국이 지역협력체에 가입하는 동기를 국내 정치 및 경제 상황에 초점을 맞춰 분석한 미시적 접근으로 이를 보완하였다.