• Title/Summary/Keyword: CDRAD Phantom

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Stationary and Moving Computed Radiography Grids : Comparative Observer's Perception (Computed Radiography에서 고정형 그리드와 이동형 그리드 영상의 인식률 비교)

  • Lee, Kiho;Lee, Changhoon;Jin, Gyehwan
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.9 no.7
    • /
    • pp.515-521
    • /
    • 2015
  • This study assessed the degradation of image quality caused by grid artifacts and $moir{\acute{e}}$ pattern artifacts in a stationary grid, and the degradation of image quality caused by cut off artifacts in a moving grid. X-ray images were acquired in a stationary grid and a moving grid with X-ray exposure conditions of 100 cm, 80 kVp, and 30 mA using a CDRAD phantom and a 24 cm thickness acrylic phantom. Observer's perception of X-ray imaging using CDRAD Analyzer was mean 49.36, standard deviation 3.76, maximum 55.56, and minimum 38.67 in the stationary grid, and 47.04, 12.69, 55.56, and 20.89, respectively, in the moving grid. The stationary grid was superior to the moving grid in terms of the mean and standard deviation of observer's perception.

Evaluation of Contrast-detail Characteristics of an A-Se Based Digital X-ray Imaging System (A-Se 기반 디지털 X-선 영상장치의 Contrast-detail 특성 평가)

  • Hyun, Hye-Kyung;Park, So-Hyun;Kim, Keun-Young;Cho, Hee-Moon;Cho, Hyo-Sung
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.11-16
    • /
    • 2007
  • In this study, we have performed contrast-detail analysis for an amorphous selenium(a-Se) based digital X-ray imaging system by using a contrast-detail phantom(CDRAD 2.0) to test its low contrast performance. The X-ray imaging system utilizes an 500-mm-thick a-Se semiconductor X-ray absorber coated over an amorphous silicon(a-Si) TFT(thin-film transistor) detector matrix with a $139mm{\times}139mm$ pixel size and a $46.7cm{\times}46.7cm$ active area. In the measurement of contrast-detail curves we first acquired X-ray images of the CDRAD 2.0 phantom at given test conditions(i.e., 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 kVp, and 16 mA.s), and then evaluated the contrast-detail characteristics of the imaging system from each phantom image by using an image quality factor called the image-quality-figure-inverse(IQFinv). The IQFinv values for the imaging system gradually improved with the photon fluence, indicating the improvement of image visibility: 24.4, 35.3, 39.2, 41.5, and 43.4 at photon fluences of $1.8{\times}105$, $5.9{\times}105$, $11.3{\times}105$, $19.4{\times}105$, and $29.4{\times}105$ photons/$mm^2$, respectively.

  • PDF