• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.17-28
• /
• 2003

We met results like the followings through the literatures and questionnaires about the tasks and solutions about the insurance fee of packed medical herbs. 1) It's turned out that 74.8% of herb doctors agrees to the insurance fee of packed medical herbs. However, in comparison with the same survey of the herb doctor association the percentage of general approval went somewhat lower, and especially the percentage of 'positive approval' became notably lower$(43.7%{\rightarrow}26.5%)$ and the percentage of 'active objection' raised about 2 times$(6.8%{\rightarrow}12.9%)$. Inquiring into the approval reasons on the insurance fee application of packed medical herbs some heads such as 'development toward treatment medical science' and 'decrease of publics burden' were higher than the one of 'management income and expenditure.' 2) As a result of the research, 36.0% of the patients and 42.8% of the residents recognized that the pay range of Chinese herb health insurance is narrow. They recognized that less people have the experiences of Chinese medical hospital use and internal application of the packed medical herbs as they are older, men rather than women. 85.4% of the patients and 74.9% of the residents agreed on the insurance pay of packed medical herbs. It's shown that they agree on the Chinese medical hospital use more as the economic standard is lower, on the insurance pay as they have ever taken the packed medical herbs. In the aspect of increase of insurance fee, 66.7% of the patients and 44.3% of the residents agreed on the insurance pay of packed medical herbs, and 18.1% and 36.1% disagreed on the insurance pay of packed medical herbs. The main objective reason why they disagree on the insurance pay of packed medical herbs was 'because the insurance fee goes up higher,' which answered 95.2% of the patients and 78.8% of the residents. 7.22% of the patients and 1.80% of the residents answered that they can pay more insurance fee in case of the insurance pay of packed medical herbs. However, in the priority order of the insurance pay, it hold the 5th position between 2 target research groups which was less than medical examination, charges for hospital accommodation and taking MRI. 3) According to the result of analysis about the cost of packed medical herbs, current practice price is 115,000 won and the average prime cost of a packed medical herb is 73,000 to 106,000 won. It's examined that the herb doctors regard that 95,000 won will be reasonable when the packed medical herb is payed in insurance. However, it was found out that the public generally thinks that the price would be appropriate on the level of 30,000 to 40,000 won and the percentage of the answers of 20,000 won to 30,000 was fairly high. 4) the central system of a prescription should be change into the central system of demonstration and the sick and wounded. 5) To solve this problem, the government should regulate it to pass by the circulation gradation of [importer, $peasantry{\rightarrow}manufacturer{\rightarrow}wholesaler{\rightarrow}distributor$(Chinese medical hospital, pharmacy dispensary of Chinese medicine)]And it should intervene into the quality and the circulation steps of Chinese medicine through 'the office or organization which is in charge of certification of Chinese medicine' and 'the office or organization which is in charge of the circulation of Chinese medicine.' And some actions such as simple severance, lavation, drying should be included into the conception of manufacture and the boundary between food and medical supplies should be made at a manufactory. And the regulation of standardized goods at one's own house should be improved so that, the peasantry can sell the materials of Chinese medicine only to the manufacturer. 6) In company with the insurance pay of packed medical herbs, the study about the separation of dispensary from medical practice in the Chinese medicine should be accomplished.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제50호
• /
• pp.273-309
• /
• 2016

서울시는 다른 기관과 달리 기능분류시스템 구축과 업무관리시스템 도입 사이에 3년의 시간차가 발생하여 기능분류체계의 현행관리가 되지 못했고, 이것은 기록관리기준표를 수립하지 못하는 문제로 이어졌다. 2012년 9월 서울시는 기록관리와 정보공개를 전담하는 정보공개정책과의 신설을 통해 기능분류시스템과 기록관리기준표의 운영부서를 통합하였다. 이를 계기로 2013~2014년 2년에 걸쳐 'BRM 및 기록관리기준표 정비사업(이하 BRM 정비사업)'을 추진하게 되었다. 본 연구는 서울시 사례를 중심으로 BRM 정비를 통한 기록관리기준표 개선사례를 소개하고자 한다. 서울시 BRM 정비사업은 업무담당자의 부담과 업무관리시스템의 운영공백을 최소화하기 위한 정비방법론을 수립하였다. 업무관리시스템 도입 후 분류체계를 정비하는 선례가 없는 상황에서 관련부서와의 긴밀한 협의를 통해 독자적인 절차를 개발하고 정비결과를 시스템에 탑재하였다. 또한 BRM 정비사업을 성공적으로 수행하고 향후 안정적인 운영을 위해 BRM 부서관리자를 대상으로 정비 전 후 2차례에 걸쳐 교육을 진행하였고, 정비사업 기간 동안 뉴스레터를 배포하여 전 직원들의 적극적인 참여를 유도하고 기록관리 인식을 높이기 위해 노력하였다. 뿐만 아니라 정비성과를 유지하고 향후 BRM의 체계적인 관리를 위해 기록관리시스템에 단위과제 현황기능 개발, 업무관리시스템에 과제관리 기능 보완, BRM 목적별 분류체계를 서울시 정보소통광장의 서비스에 적용하는 등 여러 개선사항을 마련하였다. 본 연구가 새롭게 BRM을 도입하려는 기관 또는 분류체계 정비사업을 준비하는 기관에서 시행착오를 줄이는데 참고사례가 될 수 있기를 바란다.