• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.96-100
• /
• 2002

Purpose: The proper reconstructive technique after a partial gastrectomy for an adenocarcinoma of the stomach is often debated, but few data exist to clarify the issue. The aim of this study was to compare retrospectively the early postoperative results and complications after different anastomoses used during a partial gastrectomy for a gastric adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the hospital records of 218 patients who had undergone a subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer at Chosun University Hospital between January 1997 and July 2000. Of the 218 subtotal gastrectomies performed with curative intent, 127 reconstructions were Billroth I gastrectomies and 91 were Billroth II gastrectomies. The following data were analyzed: age, sex, tumor size, gastric resection margin, timing of removal of the nasogastric tube, first bowel movement, resumption of oral feeding, and postoperative complications. Results: The timing of removal of the nasogastric tube was significantly earlier in the Billroth Igroup than in the Billroth II group ($27.9\pm13.9$ hours and $69.7\pm68$ hours, respectively)(P<0.05). Resumption of oral feeding was possible on day $4.6\pm1.5$ in the Billroth I group and on dsy $5.2\pm1.5$ in the Billroth II group (P<0.05). There were no anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, and postoperative mortality among the patients in either group. Conclusions: the Billroth lgastrectomy should be considered for patients undergoing a partial gastric resection for gastric cancer due to its physiological benefits and acceptable rate of complication.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.120-125
• /
• 2012

Purpose: Mechanical stapler is regarded as a good alternative to the hand sewing technique, when used in gastric reconstruction. The circular stapling method has been widely applied to gastrectomy (open orlaparoscopic), for gastric cancer. We illustrated and compared the hand-sutured method to the circular stapling method, for Billroth-II, in patients who underwent laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: Between April 2009 and May 2011, 60 patients who underwent laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy, with Billroth-II, were enrolled. Hand-sutured Billroth-II was performed in 40 patients (manual group) and circular stapler Billroth-II was performed in 20 patients (stapler group). Clinicopathological features and post-operative outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: Nosignificant differences were observed in clinicopathologic parameters and post-operative outcomes, except in the operation times. Operation times and anastomosis times were significantly shorter in the stapler group (P=0.004 and P<0.001). Conclusions: Compared to the hand-sutured method, the circular stapling method can be applied safely and more efficiently, when performing Billroth-II anastomosis, after laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

• Clinical Endoscopy
• /
• 제55권1호
• /
• pp.86-94
• /
• 2022

Background/Aims: The anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy is the area most affected by duodenogastric reflux. Different reconstruction methods may affect the lesion characteristics and treatment outcomes of remnant gastric cancers at the anastomotic site. We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathologic and endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes of remnant gastric cancers at the anastomotic site. Methods: We recruited 34 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancer at the anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy. Clinicopathology and treatment outcomes were compared between the Billroth II and nonBillroth II groups. Results: The tumor size in the Billroth II group was significantly larger than that in the non-Billroth II group (22 vs. 19 mm; p=0.048). More severe gastritis was detected endoscopically in the Billroth II group (2 vs. 1.33; p=0.0075). Moreover, operation time was longer (238 vs. 121 min; p=0.004) and the frequency of bleeding episodes was higher (7.5 vs. 3.1; p=0.014) in the Billroth II group. Conclusions: Compared to remnant gastric cancers in non-Billroth II patients, those in the Billroth II group had larger lesions with a background of severe remnant gastritis. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancers in Billroth II patients involved longer operative times and more frequent bleeding episodes than that in patients without Billroth II.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.337-343
• /
• 2020

Distal gastrectomy with Billroth I or II reconstruction may cause duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER), thereby resulting in digestive or respiratory symptoms. The mainstay of treatment is medication with proton pump inhibitors. However, these drugs may have limited effects in DGER. Laparoscopic fundoplication has been proven to be highly effective in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but it cannot be performed optimally for GERD that develops after gastrectomy. We report the case of a 72-year-old man with a history of distal gastrectomy and Billroth I anastomosis due to early gastric cancer. GERD due to bile reflux occurred after surgery and was refractory to medical therapy. The patient underwent Roux-en-Y conversion from Billroth I gastroduodenostomy and hiatal hernia repair with only cruroplasty. Fundoplication was not performed. His symptoms improved significantly after the surgery. Therefore, laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and Roux-en-Y conversion can be an effective surgical procedure to treat medically refractory DGER after Billroth I gastrectomy.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.46-52
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical and long-term functional outcomes of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 697 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for operable gastric cancer between January 2009 and December 2012. The patients were classified into three groups according to the reconstruction methods: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y. The parameters evaluated included patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Endoscopic findings of the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, bile (RGB) classification and the Los Angeles classification 1 year postoperatively. Results: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y were performed in 165 (23.7%), 371 (53.2%), and 161 patients (23.1%), respectively. Operation time was significantly shorter ($173.4{\pm}44.7$ minute, P<0.001) as was time to first flatus ($2.8{\pm}0.8$ days, P=0.009), time to first soft diet was significantly faster ($4.3{\pm}1.0$ days, P<0.001), and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter ($7.7{\pm}4.0$ days, P=0.004) in Billroth I in comparison to the other methods. Postoperative complications higher than Clavien-Dindo grade III occurred in 61 patients (8.8%) with no statistically significant differences between groups (P=0.797). Endoscopic findings confirmed that gastric residue, gastritis, bile reflux, and reflux esophagitis were significantly lower in Roux-en-Y (P<0.001) patients. Conclusions: Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer is beneficial in terms of long-term functional outcome, whereas Billroth I reconstruction for distal-third gastric cancer has a superior short-term surgical outcome and postoperative weight change.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.215-222
• /
• 2009

목적: 원위부 위절제술 후 재건술의 하나인 Billroth II 위공장문합술은 오랫동안 사용되어온 방법이나 역류성 위염의 빈도가 높다는 것이 문제점 중의 하나이다. 이를 보완하기 위한 여러 시도가 있었으나 그 중 잔위의 크기에 따라 Roux-en-Y 위공장문합술, Braun 공장문합술 및 Billroth II 위공장문합술을 달리 시행한 후 그 적용의 적합성을 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2003년 9월부터 2007년 4월까지 하부 및 중위 위선암으로 단일 술자에 의해 원위부 위절제를 받은 후 잔위의 크기가 10% 이하일 때 Roux-en-Y 위공장문합술 (14명)을, 잔위가 10~20%일 때 Braun 공장문합술(17명)을, 잔위가 20~40%일 때 Billroth I이 부적합하다고 판단된 경우 - Billroth II 위공장문합술(14명)을 시행 후, 각각의 치료성적을 분석하였다. 분석 방법은 전화 설문과 의무기록을 조사하여 환자의 증상 및 내시경 소견을 평가하였고 술 후 영양 상태를 평가하기 위하여 혈중알부민, 혈색소농도 및 체중의 변화를 측정하였다. 결과: 수술 사망률 0%, 수술 합병률 8.9% (4/45)로 모든 수술은 안전하게 시행되었다. 내시경 소견에서 역류성 위염은 Roux-en-Y군, Braun군 및 Billroth II군에서 각각 7.63%, 18.65%, 40.0%에서 보였다(P=0.13). 가벼운 역류성 식도염이 Roux-Y군과 Braun군에서 각각 1명씩 있었다. 내시경적 위저류는 Roux-en-Y군에서 2예가 보였으며 이 중 1예는 역류성식도염의 원인이 되었다. Roux-en-Y군과 Braun군이 Billroth II 군보다 식사량의 감소가 적었으며(각각 7.1%, 0.0%, 28.7%, P=0.036), 식후 불편감(각각 14.3%, 23.5%, 57.1%, P=0.035)과 역류 증상(각각 0.0%, 11.8%, 42.9%, P=0.009)을 적게 호소하였다. 결론: 작은 잔위를 가지는 환자에서 시행된 Roux-en-Y 위공장문합술과 Braun 공장문합술은 역류증상의 방지와 위절제 후 불편감을 줄이는데 효과적이라고 생각하며, 10% 미만의 잔위에서는 Roux-en-Y를, 그 외의 경우에는 Braun 문합을 확대적용을 고려하는 것이 좋겠다.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.16-22
• /
• 2007

목적: 하부 위암의 절제술 후 각각의 재건술에 따른 환자의 위배출시간과 영양상태, 덤핑 증후군의 발생정도를 비교하여 환자의 증상과 삶의 질을 개선하는 방법을 찾고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1999년 6월부터 2002년 7월까지 원위부 위암으로 절제술을 시행한 환자 중 2003년 1월 한 달간 외래에서 술 후 6개월 이상 경과한 환자 122명을 대상으로 하였다. 위십이지장문합술을 받은 환자(이하 B-I군)는 51명, 위공장문합술을 받은 환자(이하 B-II군)는 71명이었다. 위배출검사는 동위원소 검사법을 이용하여 T1/2값을 얻어 비교하였고, 식사 횟수와 양, 체중감소 정도를 비교하였다. 수술 후 복부증상을 비교하였으며, 덤핑증후군은 Sigstad score를 측정하여 비교하였다. 결과: 수술 후 6개월의 T1/2값은 B-I군에서 지연되어 있었다($159.4{\pm}31.0min$). 12개월 후에는 B-I군의 위배출시간이 빨라져 B-I군과 B-II군 사이의 위배출 시간의 차이가 없어졌다. 식사 횟수는 각 군 간의 차이가 없었고 일회식사량은 수술 전과 비교해 보았을 때 6개월째는 각군간의 차이가 없었으나 12개월에는 B-I군이 B-II군에 비해 식사량이 많은 것으로 나타났다(P=0.038). 수술 후 체중은 B-I군이 B-II군에 비해 체중감소가 의미있게 적은 것으로 나타났다(P=0.023). Sigstad dumping score는 B-I군에서 6개월째에는 7.6점, 12개월째에는 3.4점으로 시간이 경과함에 따라 덤핑 증후군의 빈도가 감소하나 B-II군에서는 시간의 경과해도 덤핑 증후군의 빈도에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 결론: 원위부 위암환자에서 근치적 수술이 가능한 한도에서는 Billroth I 술식이 체중감소가 적고, 복부 증상도 적게 나타났으며 덤핑증후군의 빈도도 낮아 환자의 삶의 질을 개선하는데 B-II 술식보다 유용한 술식으로 생각된다.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.91-95
• /
• 2002

Purpose: We compared the quality of life (QOL) and nutritional outcomes following both Billroth I (BI) and Billroth II (BII) reconstructions after a subtotal gastrectomy in order to identify which reconstruction would produce a better QOL and nutritional outcomes and to provide better follow-up management. Materials and Methods: We studied 273 patients without evidence of recurrent disease following a curative distal subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Among them, 135 underwent a BI reconstruction and 138 a BII reconstruction. The nutritional status was assessed by using levels of hemoglobin, serum albumin, iron, and vitamin B12 and by calculating the relative body weight, the body mass index, and the percentage of body fat. The QOL was measured by using the Troidl score and by treatment-specific symptoms based on the criteria, somewhat modified by the authors, of Korenaga and others. Results: There was no significant difference in QOL between the BI and the BII groups. More than half of the patients revealed anemia, regardless of the type of reconstruction. The serum vitamin $B_{12}$ level of the BII group was lower than that of the BI group. The BII group showed a tendency toward lower hemoglobin levels and serum iron concentrations than the BI group did. Conclusions: The quality of life was not impaired in most patients after either a BI or a BII reconstruction. However, both resulted in iron deficiency anemia, although the incidence was higher after a BII reconstruction. The patient's serum iron and vitamin B12 should be measured periodically and these must be administered if the measurements reveal a below normal range.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.34-43
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The intracorporeal reconstruction after laparoscopic gastrectomy can minimize postoperative pain, and give better cosmetic effect, while it may have technical difficulties and require the learning curve. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcome of intracorporeal reconstruction according to the surgeon's experience comparing with extracorporeal procedure. Materials and Methods: From January 2009 to September 2011, intracorporeal reconstruction in laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer was performed for 71 patients (Intra group). During same period, 231 patients underwent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (Extra group). These patients were classified into initial (1st to 20th case of intra group), intermediate (21th to 46th case), and experienced (after 47th case) phases. Results: Intracorporeal procedures included 35 cases of Billroth-I, 30 Billroth-II and 6 Roux en Y reconstructions. In the initial phase, operation time (P=0.022) were significantly longer for the patients of intra group than them of extra group. Although the difference was not significant, the length of hospital stay was longer and complication rate was higher in the intra group. In intermediate and experienced phases, there was no difference between two groups in operation time and hospital stay. In these phases, complication rate was lower in the intra group than the extra group (3.9% versus 9.7%). The pain scale was significantly lower post operation day 5 in the intra group. Conclusions: Intracorporeal reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was feasible and safe, and the technique was stabilized after 20th case if the surgeon has sufficient experiences when we compared it with extracorporeal reconstruction.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.561-573
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the long-term functional and patient-reported outcomes between intra-corporeal delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy and gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data from 616 patients who had undergone laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer between January 2015 and September 2020. Among them, 232 patients who had undergone delta-shaped anastomosis and another 232 who had undergone Billroth II anastomosis were matched using propensity scores. Confounding variables included age, sex, body mass index, physical status classification, tumor location, and T classification. Postoperative complications, nutritional outcomes, endoscopic findings, and quality of life (QoL) were compared between the 2 groups. Results: No significant differences in postoperative complications or nutritional parameters between the two groups were observed. Annual endoscopic findings revealed more residual food and less bile reflux in the delta group (P<0.001) than in the Billroth II group. Changes of QoL were significantly different regarding emotional function, insomnia, diarrhea, reflux symptoms, and dry mouth (P=0.007, P=0.002, P=0.013, P=0.001, and P=0.03, respectively). Among them, the delta group had worse insomnia, reflux symptoms, and dry mouth within three months postoperatively. Conclusions: Long-term nutritional outcomes and QoL were comparable between the delta and Billroth II groups. However, more residual food and worse short-term QoL regarding insomnia, reflux symptoms, and dry mouth were observed in the delta group. Longer fasting time before endoscopic evaluation and short-term symptom management would have been helpful for the delta group.