• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.577-608
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the stress distribution in the bone around dental implants supporting mandibular overdenture according to the number of implant and the type of attachment. Two or four implants were placed in an edentulous mandibular model and three dimensional photoelastic stress analysis was carried out to measure the fringe order around the implant supporting structure and also to calculate principal stress components at cervical area of each implant. The attachments tested were rigid and resilient type of Dolder bar, Round bar, Hader bar and Dal-Ro attchment. The results were as follows ; 1. In 2-implant supported overdenture using Round bar, Hader bar, and Dal-Ro attachment, compressive stress pattern was observed on the supporting structure of implant on loaded side, while tensile stress pattern in unloaded side. 2. In 2-implant supported overdenture using Dolder bar, the rigid Dolder bar shared the occlusal loads between 2 implants in a more favorable manner than was exhibited by the resilient type, while the resilient type placed a more stress on the distocervical area of the implant on the loaded side. But compressive stress pattern was observed in both the loaded and unloaded sides in either case. 3. In 2-implant supported overdenture, rigid and resilient type of Dolder bar exhibited more cross arch involvement than the Round bar, Hader bar, or Dal-Ro attachment. 4. In 4-implant supported overdenture using resilient Dolder bar and Hader bar, stress turned out to be distributed evenly among the implants between loaded and unloaded side, but thor was no reduction in the magnitude of the stress in the surrounding structure of implant contratry to 2-implant supported overdenture. 5. The stress pattern at cervical area of implant was different with the number of implant or the type of attachment but the overload, harmful to surrounding structure of implant, was not observed.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.98-107
• /
• 2000

Three linear strain gauges (KFR-02N-120-C1-23, Kyowa, Japan) were placed around the abutment of implant future and the maximum axial loads on the mandibular implants supporting over dentures were registered in experimental model when the overdenture was removed. The overdenture attachments used in this study were Round bar Hader bar, Dolder bar with and with out spacer. The retention of bar attachment was measured using universal testing machine while being con-trolled by Activating set and Deactivator except in case of the Hader bar. Simultaneously strains were recorded with the strain smart program in strain P-6000 series (Measurement group, Raleigh, USA). The maximum axial load was calculated and compared with each other. The results were as follows: 1. The amount and the timing of the maximum axial loads were different between the right and left implant in all attachment systems. 2. The retention of bar attachment except Hader bar could be adjusted but the controllability was different among the attachment systems. 3. The more the axial load, the higher the retention with Hader bar and Dolder bar without spacer. but the tendency of increase was not shown with round bar and Dolder bar with spacer.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.119-126
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to restorate a patient who has a few remaining teeth with #15,23,24 supported Konus telescope denture in Maxillar and #44,43,33,34 supported Dolder bar retained overdenture in Mandible. Konus telescope and bar retained overdenture was taken better results in retention, support, stability compair with regular Removable partial denture. In Removable partial denture, the change of remaining teeth and edentulous ridge is natural. But Konus telescope and bar retained overdenture is a little effected in this change, so it is possiblble in long-term use. In cosider of patient's medical history and the possibility of additional tooth loss, Konus telescope denture can be easily repaired. Compaired with Konus telescope and bar retained overdenture showed high stability and easy cleansing because of rigid support, cross - arch splinting, and simple design. In delivery, patient had a difficulty with removal of denture and plaque control, but showed better condition, good oral hygienic care. Patient satisfied with denture functionally and esthetically. This study showed Konus telescope and bar retained overdenture was effective for treatment of patient remaing a few teeth in function, esthetic and psycologic satisfaction.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.254-258
• /
• 2012

Implant-supported overdenture is a reliable treatment option for the patients with edentulous mandible when they have difficulty in using complete dentures. Several options have been used for implant-supported overdenture attachments. Among these, bar attachment system has greater retention and better maintainability than others. SFI-Bar$^{(R)}$ is prefabricated and can be adjustable at chairside. Therefore, laboratory procedures such as soldering and welding are unnecessary, which leads to fewer errors and lower costs. A 67-year-old female patient presented, complaining of mobility of lower anterior teeth with old denture. She had been wearing complete denture in the maxilla and removable partial denture in the mandible with severe bone loss. After extracting the teeth, two implants were placed in front of mental foramen, and SFI-Bar$^{(R)}$ was connected. A tube bar was seated to two adapters through large ball joints and fixation screws, connecting each implant. The length of the tube bar was adjusted according to inter-implant distance. Then, a female part was attached to the bar beneath the new denture. This clinical report describes two-implant-supported overdenture using the SFI-Bar$^{(R)}$ system in a mandibular edentulous patient.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.359-371
• /
• 2008

연구목적: 본 연구에서는 하악의 동일한 부위에 4개의 임플랜트를 식립하여 임플랜트 피개의치를 설계하는 경우, 바 구조와 이중관 구조 간의 응력분포에 대해 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 연구재료 및 방법: 하악골, 하악골에 식립한 4개의 임플랜트, 일차고정의 바 연결 상부구조, 이차고정의 이중관 상부구조를 삼차원 유한요소 모델링하였고, 상부 구조물에 최대 교두 감합위를 재현하는 수직하중과 측방운동시 작업측의 군기능을 재현하는 경사하중을 가하고, 최대 응력과 응력분포를 하악골, 임플랜트 지대주, 임플랜트 상부 구조물에서 분석하였다. 결과: 1. 악골에서의 최대 응력값은 경사하중을 제외하고 수직하중과 작업측 경사하중에서 이중관 구조가 바 구조에 비해 다소 적은 응력값을 보였다. 이중관 구조가 바 구조에 비해 비교적 악골 전체에 고르게 응력이 분포되었다. 2. 지대주에서는 모든 하중 조건에서 이중관 구조가 바 구조에 비해 낮은 응력값을 보였다. 응력 분포 양상은 두 구조에서 모두 비슷한 양상을 나타내었으며, 최후방 지대주의 원심면에 응력이 집중되었다. 3. 상부구조물에서는 모든 하중 조건에서 이중관 구조가 바 구조에 비해 높은 응력값을 나타냈다. 그러나, 바 구조에서는 바의 각 중심부와 지대주와의 연결부위, 지대주의 치경부에 응력이 집중된 반면, 이중관 구조에서는 상부 구조물 전체에 비교적 고른 응력 분포를 보였다. 결론: 본 연구 결과 이중관 구조가 바 구조보다 악골과 지대주에서는 더 낮은 응력을, 상부 구조물에서는 더 큰 응력을 나타냈다. 상부 구조물에 비교적 크게 전달되는 응력을 견딜 수 있는 상부구조물의 설계와 재료 선택만 이루진다면, 응력분포 면에서 이차고정을 하는 이중관 구조가 일차 고정하는 바 구조에 비해 유리하리라 생각된다.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제54권1호
• /
• pp.39-48
• /
• 2016

SFI-bar is prefabricated bar system and can be assembled at chairside without soldering or welding, thus reducing bone loss, costs and time. A 53-year-old male patient, who had severely absorbed mandible, hoped to wear a stable mandiblular denture. Four implants were placed in the extraction site of canine and 1st molar. Early loaded temporary denture with solitary type attachment was delivered 3 weeks after surgery. 3 month later, SFI-bar was connected and adjusted at chairside. Then, implant overdenture using SFI-bar was delivered. This case report showed that a satisfactory clinical result was achieved by 4-implant-supported overdenture using the SFI-Bar system in a mandibular edentulous patient.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제61권1호
• /
• pp.55-62
• /
• 2023

완전 무치악 환자에게서 잔존 치조골의 흡수가 심할 경우 의치의 저작효율과 안정성 향상을 위해 임플란트로부터 지지를 얻는 피개의치를 고려해볼 수 있다. 임플란트 식립 위치를 선정할 때 디지털 진단 프로그램을 이용하면 환자의 해부학적 요소와 최종보철물의 형태를 고려한 수술용 가이드를 만들어 임플란트 수술의 정확도를 높일 수 있다. 임플란트 지지 피개의치에서 다양한 부착장치 중 milled bar 경우 임플란트간의 연결고정 효과뿐만 아니라 견고한 지지를 얻을 수 있는 이점이 있다. 이에 본 증례에서는 치조골 삭제 전, 후의 상황을 가정한 두 개의 수술용 가이드를 이용하여 임플란트를 식립한 후 milled bar를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치를 장착해주어 기능적이고 심미적인 결과를 얻었다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.93-103
• /
• 1999

Stress distribution on mandibular implants supporting overdentures were registered in vitro experimental model by means of 4 rosette gauges which were placed around the implant. The overdenture attachments used in this study were the Resilient Dolder bar, Rigid Bolder bar, Round bar, Hader bar & Dal-Ro attachment. An occlusal jig was placed on the overdenture and the loading sites were 3 points which mimicked working, balancing, and median relations. With 5 and 10kg loading, strains were measured by strain indicator(P-3500, Measurement group, Raleigh, USA), and using these data, maximum and minimum principal stresses and Von Mises stress were calculated and evaluated. The results were as follows : There was a tendency of high stress concentration in the lingual side of the implant, and in the buccal side low stress was developed regardless of the attachment systems. The resilient Bolder bar concentrated highest stress among the attachment systems, and the Round bar and the Dal-Ro attachment provided comparatively low stresses around the implant. The rigid Bolder bar concentrated high stress in the mesial side, and the Dal-Ro attachment developed tensile stress patterns in the lingual and distal sides of the implant at the balancing relation.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제55권3호
• /
• pp.292-299
• /
• 2017

무치악 환자에서 치아 상실 후 오랜 기간에 걸친 치조골 흡수는 의치의 사용을 어렵게 한다. 하악 무치악 환자에게 두 개 혹은 네 개의 임플란트를 식립하여 임플란트 피개의치를 이용하는 방식은 쉽게 접근할 수 있고, 의치의 유지, 지지와 안정을 크게 향상시킬 수 있는 방법이다. 임플란트 피개의치에 사용되는 어태치먼트 중에서 milled bar는 기성 bar보다 상부 구조물의 견고한 안정성과 충분한 유지력을 얻기 위해 사용할 수 있으며, 최근 CAD/CAM system의 발달과 함께 기공과정이 간소화되어 이용이 용이하게 되었다. 본 증례는 오랜 기간 상, 하악 총의치를 사용했던 환자에게 상악은 전통적인 방식으로 제작한 총의치와 하악에 네 개의 임플란트를 식립하여 CAD/CAM milled bar를 이용해 하악 임플란트 피개의치로 수복하여 만족스러운 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하는 바이다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.368-374
• /
• 2018

본 증례의 환자는 약 10여년 전 2개의 임플란트를 이용하여 Gold Hader bar 하악 임플란트 피개 의치로 수복하였고, 3년 6개월의 사용으로 인한 bar의 심한 마모로 유지력을 상실하였다. 이를 Locator 부착장치를 이용하여 하악 피개 의치를 수리하였으나, Locator 사용 6년 6개월 후 male 부위가 완전히 닳은 상태로 내원하게 되었다. 다음으로는 하이브리드 이중관(Hybrid telescopic double crown with friction pin)을 사용하여 임플란트 피개 의치를 새로 제작하였고, 이를 2년동안 관찰한 결과 우수한 예후를 보여주고 있다. 여기에서 한 환자에서 2가지(Gold Hader bar, Locator)방법으로 수복한 임플란트 피개 의치에서 각 부착장치의 실패원인에 대해서 알아보고, 이중관 피개 의치의 장단점과 성공을 위한 조건에 대해서 보고하고자 한다.