• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2015년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.586-588
• /
• 2015

미국은 탄도미사일 방어체계(BMDS, Ballistic Missile Defense System) 구축의 일환으로 유럽에 EPAA(European Phased Adaptive Approach)를 구축하고 있다. EPAA는 이란의 탄도미사일로부터 유럽지역의 나토(NATO) 동맹국들을 보호하기 위해 3단계에 걸쳐 구축될 예정이며, 1단계에는 이지스 BMD를 탑재한 이지스함을 지중해에 배치함으로써 완료되었고, 현재 2단계가 진행 중이다. 본 논문에서는 EPAA의 개념, 특징 및 구축 현황과 향후 계획에 대해 조사하여 기술하였다.

• 정보화연구
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.391-400
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 전구 탄도미사일 방어(TBMD)를 위한 협동교전의 기능아키텍처 도출에 관한 논문이다. TBMD는 다층으로 구성되며 네트워크 기반의 센서체계, 슈터체계, 그리고 전장관리체계로 구성되는 복합시스템이다. 협동교전능력은 대표적인 실시간 전장관리체계이며, 협동교전능력의 핵심기능은 협동교전이다. 협동교전은 두 개 이상의 분산된 자산의 통합을 통해 얻어진 시너지 효과로 위협을 제거하는 전투개념이다. 이러한 관점에서 본 논문은 개념 분석을 통해 TBMD의 협동교전 기능아키텍처를 제시하였으며, 이는 협동교전 기반의 TBMD 전투체계를 개발하기 위한 선행연구로서 수행되었다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 2005년도 춘계공동학술대회 발표논문
• /
• pp.1020-1025
• /
• 2005

The set covering(SC) problem has many practical application of modeling not only real world problems in civilian but also in military. In this paper we study optimal allocation model for maximizing utility of consolidating old fashioned and new air defense weapon system like Patriot missile and develop the new computational algorithm for the SC problem by using simulated annealing(SA) algorithm. This study examines three different methods: 1) simulated annealing(SA); 2) accelerated simulated annealing(ASA); and 3) selection by effectiveness degree(SED) with SA. The SED is adopted as an enhanced SA algorithm that the neighboring solutions could be generated only in possible optimal feasible region at the PERTURB function. Furthermore, we perform various experiments for both a reduced and an extended scale sized situations depending on the number of customers(protective objective), service(air defense), facilities(air defense artillery), threat, candidate locations, and azimuth angles of Patriot missile. Our experiment shows that the SED obtains the best results than others.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권40호
• /
• pp.82-114
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this article is to analyze the progress of North Korea's SLBM threat, and to assess the technological capacity and threat level of its SLBMs. Currently, North Korea has approximately 1000 ballistic missiles, such as the SCUD, Musudan, and Nodong, in stock. This article pays close attention to the background and strategical implication behind North Korea's obsession with developing SLBMs despite possessing sufficient means to launch provocations with its current arsenal of ground based ballistic missiles and conventional weapons. Based on the abovementioned analysis, this article will recommend possible response directions for the ROK Armed Forces to North Korea's SLBM threat. It is highly difficult to detect SLBMs due to its stealthy nature, as it is launched underwater after covert infiltration. North Korea's SLBM is considered a game changer in that even one SLBM can significantly change the strategic balance of North East Asia. North Korea's SLBM test launch in August has made a 500km flight, landing 80km inside the JADIZ (Japan Air Defense Identification Zone), and as such, it is assessed that North Korea already possesses underwater ejection and cold launch capabilities. The most realistic response to North Korea's imminent SLBM threat is bolstering anti-submarine capabilities. ROK Armed Forces need to upgrade its underwater kill-chain by modernizing and introducing new airborne anti-submarine assets and nuclear-powered submarines, among many options. Moreover, we should integrate SM-3 missiles with the Aegis Combat system that possess strong detection capabilities and flexibility, thereby establishing a sea-based Ballistic Missle Defense (BMD) system centered around the Aegis Combat System, as sea-based ballistic missile threats are best countered out in the seas. Finally, the capabilities gap that could arise as a result of budgetary concerns and timing of fielding new assets should be filled by establishing firm ROK-US-Japan combined defense posture.

• 한국시뮬레이션학회논문지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2020

과학기술의 발전에 따라 탄도탄에 대한 위협이 나날이 증대되고 있으며, 이러한 위협에 대처하기 위한 탄도탄 요격미사일에 대한 개발이 요구되고 있다. 대탄도탄용 요격미사일의 개발을 위해서는 요격시험이 필수적이다. 시험을 통해 얻은 계측자료를 활용하여 요격미사일을 포함한 전체적인 요격 시스템의 성능을 확인할 수 있다. 그러나 요격시험 시에는 요격에 의한 파편이 발생되기 때문에 안전을 위한 민간인의 접근 통제가 필요하다. 따라서 요격시험에 앞서 요격 파편에 대한 안전구역의 신뢰도 높은 추정이 선행되어야 한다. 본 논문에서는 모델링 분석 및 시뮬레이션을 활용하여 요격 파편에 대한 안전구역을 산출하였다. 우선, 탄도탄과 요격미사일의 발사단계에서 요격까지의 전 과정에 대한 시뮬레이션을 수행하였고, 요격 시점에서의 상대 속도 및 상대 각도를 산출하였다. 이 결과를 활용하여 요격 시의 에너지를 계산하고 요격 파편의 방출속도를 산출하였다. 이후, 파편에 작용하는 항력과 중력을 고려하여 낙하 궤적을 산출하였고, 파편의 낙하 지점과 위험도를 종합적으로 고려하여 최종 안전구역을 산출하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.108-116
• /
• 2015

A missile defense system is composed of radars detecting incoming missiles aiming at defense assets, command control units making the decisions on weapon target assignment, and artillery batteries firing of defensive weapons to the incoming missiles. Although, the technology behind the development of radars and weapons is very important, effective assignment of the weapons against missile threats is much more crucial. When incoming missile targets toward valuable assets in the defense area are detected, the asset-based weapon target assignment model addresses the issue of weapon assignment to these missiles so as to maximize the total value of surviving assets threatened by them. In this paper, we present a model for an asset-based weapon assignment problem with shoot-look-shoot engagement policy and fixed set-up time between each anti-missile launch from each defense unit. Then, we show detailed linear approximation process for nonlinear portions of the model and propose final linear approximation model. After that, the proposed model is applied to several ballistic missile defense scenarios. In each defense scenario, the number of incoming missiles, the speed and the position of each missile, the number of defense artillery battery, the number of anti-missile in each artillery battery, single shot kill probability of each weapon to each target, value of assets, the air defense coverage are given. After running lpSolveAPI package of R language with the given data in each scenario in a personal computer, we summarize its weapon target assignment results specified with launch order time for each artillery battery. We also show computer processing time to get the result for each scenario.

• International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.614-621
• /
• 2016

Micro-Doppler (MD) shift caused by the micro-motion of a ballistic missile (BM) can be very useful to identify it. In this paper, the MD signatures of three scale-model BMs are investigated using a portable measurement system. The measurement system consists of an X-band 2-by-2 phase comparison mono-pulse radar, and a mechanical device that can impart controlled spinning and coning motions simultaneously to a model to yield the MD signature that replicates the characteristic of each target and the corresponding micro-motion. The coning motion determined the overall period of MD, and the spinning motion increased its amplitude. MD was also dependent on aspect angle. The designed system is portable, and can implement many micro-motions; it will contribute to analysis of MD in various situations.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권42호
• /
• pp.196-223
• /
• 2017

The aim of this paper is to analyze China's naval strengthening and threat reflected in submarines, aircraft, destroyers and missile capabilities and US Navy's counter-forces. China is strengthening its naval forces in accordance with its three-step naval force build-up plan, and the introduction of Russian destroyers and submarines is a foothold for China's naval enforcement. The Chinese Navy also converted the concept of the First-Second Island Chain Defense, which it had already maintained, to the concept of maritime layer defense. Currently, the Chinese Navy maintains the concept of a Three-Maritime Layer Defense which includes the South China Sea, where artificial islands are being built by China, in the First Layer Defense and the East China Sea in the Third Layer Defense. Along with the advancement of Chinese Navy's submarines, surface vessels and aircraft's operational capabilities, ballistic and cruise missile capabilities become a major threat to the US Navy. If a crisis occurs in the East China Sea or in the Taiwan Waters, the US Navy will face more difficulties in employing the Carrier Strike Group to manage the crisis. Meanwhile, if a crisis occurs on the Korean Peninsula, it will be a burden to dispatch Carrier Strike GroupS to the East and West Seas of the Korean Peninsula. For the stable future, the US Navy should develop a strategy to respond more effectively to the Chinese Navy, which is challenging new maritime supremacy in East Asia.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제18권12호
• /
• pp.3063-3068
• /
• 2014

표적의 RCS(Radar Cross Section)는 레이더 탐지 성능을 결정하는데 중요한 요소이므로 표적을 효율적으로 탐지하기 위해 RCS가 크게 나타나는 위치에 레이더를 배치하는 것이 유리하다. 그러나 표적의 RCS와 함께 표적과 레이더 간의 거리 또한 레이더에 수신되는 신호의 강도를 결정하는 중요한 요소이다. 본 논문에서는 탄도미사일을 대상으로 동일한 횡축 선상에서 위치를 변경하면서 표적을 관측하였을 때 레이더에 수신되는 전력을 계산하고, 탐지 효율을 높이기 위한 레이더 배치 방안에 대해 연구하였다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권41호
• /
• pp.232-260
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this paper is to open a debate about what kind of deterrent strategy the ROK military should pursue in the era of NK's weapons of mass destruction and missile threats. I argue that the ROK military needs a comprehensive deterrent strategy that reflects the international security situations and trends and that builds on clear understanding of the basic concepts and how deterrence operates. The paper starts with surveying the basic knowledge of deterrence from the perspectives of both theory and practice. Then, it provides explanations on why deterrence against NK can be particularly difficult given the security environment in and around the Korean peninsula. For example, South Korea and North Korea hardly share 'common knowledge' that serves as a basic element for the operation of deterrence. Deterrence against North Korea involves complex situations in that both deterrence and compellence strategies may be relevant particularly to North Korea's WMD and missile threats. It also involves both immediate and general deterrence. Based on the discussion, I suggest several ideas that may serve as guidelines for establishing a deterrent strategy against NK. First, our threats for deterrence should be the ones that can be realized, particularly in terms of the international norms. In other words, they must be considered appropriate among other nations in the international community. Second, there should be separate plans for the different kinds of threats: one is conventional, local provocations and the other is WMD/missile related provocations. Third, we should pursue much closer cooperative relations with the U.S. military to enhance the effectiveness of immediate deterrence in the Korean peninsula. Fourth, the ROK military should aim to accomplish 'smart deterrence' maximizing the benefits of technological superiority. Fifth, the ROK military readiness and structure should be able to deny emerging North Korean military threats such as the submarine-launched ballistic missiles and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Lastly, in executing threats, we should consider that the current action influences credibility and reputation of the ROK, which in turn affect the decisions for future provocations. North Korea's WMD/missile threats may soon become critical strategic-level threats to South Korea. In retrospect, the first debate on building a missile defense system in South Korea dates back to the 1980s. Mostly the debate has centered on whether or not South Korea's system should be integrated into the U.S. missile defense system. In the meantime, North Korea has become a small nuclear power that can threaten the United States with the ballistic missiles capability. If North Korea completes the SLBM program and loads the missiles on a submarine with improved underwater operation capability, then, South Korea may have to face the reality of power politics demonstrated by Thucydides through the Athenians: "The strong do what they have the power to do, the weak accept what they have to accept."