• 제목/요약/키워드: Baldrige Health Care Criteria

검색결과 5건 처리시간 0.018초

국립정신병원의 의료서비스평가기준에 대한 인과관계분석: 말콤 볼드리지 모델을 중심으로 (Causal Relationships among Health Care Criteria in the Korean National Mental Hospitals: Using Baldrige Health Care Model)

  • 문재영;이상철;김양균
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제18권1호
    • /
    • pp.43-62
    • /
    • 2008
  • The purpose of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship among health care criteria in Korean National Mental Hospitals, using Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA). The survey instrument consists of 92 Questions from the seven the MBNQA health care criteria. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to analyze the empirical data and estimates the path coefficients among the seven categories. The result of this study indicates that Leadership drives Foundation and Direction, which influence on Systems that creates Results. Conclusively, among 18 hypotheses, 15 are statistically significant.

말콤볼드리지 의료서비스 평가 모형의 인과관계 분석 : 국내 대학 병원을 중심으로 (Causal Relationship among Baldrige Health Care Criteria in Korean University Hospitals)

  • 이상철;서영호;한상숙
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제35권4호
    • /
    • pp.1-15
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study is to evaluate the causal relationship among the MBNQA health care criteria in Korean University Hospitals. The survey instrument consists of 109 questions based on the seven MBNQA health care criteria: '1.Leadership', '2.Strategic Planning', '3.Focus on Patients Other Customers. Markets', '4.Measurement Analysis Knowledge Management', '5.Human Resource Focus', '6.Process Management', and '7.Results'. Structural Equation Modeling(SEM) is used to analyze the path coefficients among the seven categories. The results indicate that fourteen hypotheses are statistically significant, among eighteen hypotheses. Conclusively, this study found that Leadership drives systems that create Results through Foundation and Direction.

말콤 볼드리지 모형을 이용한 2차 의료기관의 전사적 품질관리와 성과 간의 인과관계 연구 (A Study on Causality between Total Quality Management and Performance of Secondary-Care Hospital Using Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Model for Healthcare)

  • 권준덕;윤치호;오현종;박범규;김양균
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제43권1호
    • /
    • pp.11-30
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to lay groundwork for future research on the outcomes of national quality awards for secondary-care healthcare organizations. Methods: For this study, a secondary-care hospital was selected through a convenience sampling method and all of its organizational members participated in complete enumeration survey using 109 survey questions derived from the MBNQA criteria for healthcare through structural equation modeling (SEM) Results: As a result, Leadership was shown to drive Foundation and Direction, which affect System that creates Results with 12 hypotheses supported out of 18 hypotheses established. Conclusion: The findings of this study will provide valuable implications to the top management of secondary-care hospitals for self-examining quality management and promoting sustainable competitiveness.

MBNQA 평가 기준을 활용한 공과대학 교육 품질 평가 (Evaluation of the Engineering Education Quality Based on the Criteria of MBNQA)

  • 소형기;손소영
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제3권2호
    • /
    • pp.84-92
    • /
    • 2000
  • 1987년 미국 기업의 종합적 품질 경영을 촉진하기 위한 목적으로 제정된 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award(MBNQA)는 이제 경영 품질의 세계 기준으로 제시되고 있다. 제정 이래 기업 경영 분야에 국한하여 평가되었던 MB상은 1999년도부터 교육 부문과 의료부문까지 확대 시행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 MB상의 평가 프로세스 및 2000년도 교육 부문 평가 기준의 변화에 대하여 소개하고, 이 평가 기준을 우리나라 대학교육기관에 적용 가능성을 확인하기 위해 연세대학교 공과대학 기전공학부 정보산업 전공과 전기공학 전공에 대하여 적용하여 보았다. 평가 결과 정보산업 전공과 전기공학 전공의 종합점수는 각각 522.5와 548.5이었으며, MB상 평가 기준에서 분류한 기준에 의하면 이 점수대는 많은 세부 영역들에 대해 효과적인 접근 방법이 사용되고 있으나, 일부 세부 영역에 대한 전개는 아직 초기 단계에 머무르고 있다고 기술되어 있다.

  • PDF

질 향상 활동성과에 영향을 미치는 요인 (Factors associated with the Degree of Quality Improvement Performance)

  • 이선희;강혜영;조우현;채유미;최귀선
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제11권4호
    • /
    • pp.54-69
    • /
    • 2001
  • This study was conducted to assess factors associated with the degree of performance of qualify improvement(QI) activities. A mailed questionnaire survey was conducted between September 15 and October 30, 2000, with the staffs being charge of QI at each of the hospitals with 400 beds or greater. Of the 108 hospitals eligible for inclusion in our study, 79 participated, yielding a response rate of 73.1%. After excluding 12 hospitals that did not perform any QI activities, 117 responses from 67 hospitals were used for the analysis. Using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria(MBNQAC), perceived performance of QI was measured in terms of the improvement of the quality of clinical practice, clinical supporting department, administrative procedure of receiving care, customer satisfaction, efficiency and standardization of work process. Factors evaluated for the association were the extent of QI implementation, compliance to 5 QI principles, participation of hospital CEOs, budget allocation, history of QI, and bed size. Path analysis was performed to assess the relationship between QI performance and these factors. Major findings of this study are as follows. Hospitals showing higher degree of QI implementation (path coefficient=0.5967, p<0.001)) and better compliance with the basic principes of QI(0.5736, p<0.05) tended to achieve better performance. Path analysis results showed that interest and participation of hospital CEOs(0.1954, p<0.05) and compliance with the basic principes of QI(0.4028, p<0.0001) indirectly affected the outcomes of QI by influencing the intermediate variable of the level of QI implementation. This study results suggest that having employees have a good orientation of the basic concept and principes of QI through relevant training be the most important requirement to achieve better outcomes from QI activities. In addition, to educate leaders of hospitals the need of active implementation of QI is important to encourage their participation and draw strong support for QI programs.

  • PDF