• Title/Summary/Keyword: BPTB allograft

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

The Result of the Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Posterior Cruciate Ligament with Autogenous or Allogenous Graft (자가 또는 동종 이식물을 이용한 후방 십자 인대 재건술 후의 결과)

  • Chon Je-Gyun;Kim Eui-Soon;Choi Bo-Yeul;Yoon Chang-Hoon;Lee Jeong-Woung;Sun Doo-Hoon;Moon Myung-Sang
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.74-79
    • /
    • 2001
  • Purpose : The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results after arthroscopic PCL reconstruction and to compare the clinical results after arthroscopic PCL reconstruction using BPTB(bone patellar tendon bone) autograft(Group I : 11 cases), Achilles tendon allograft(Group II : 7 cases) and BPTB allograft(Group 111.6 cases). Materials and Methods : We reviewed the result of 24 patients who had been managed with arthroscopic reconstruction using different graft materials such as BPTB autograft, Achilles tendon allograft and BPTB allograft. Twenty-four patients(average age, 37 years) with PCL rupture were retrospectively evaluated more than one year(average, 31 months) after having arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The clinical results were evaluated by IKDC ligament standard evaluation form, using $KT-2000^{TM}$ knee ligament arthrometer and also evaluated Lysholm knee scoring scale. Results : The final evaluation was nearly normal in 11 patients($45\%$ in Group I, $43\%$ in Group II, $50\%$ in Group III). The corrected posterior sagging was abnormal(side to side difference more than 6mm) in 8 patients($36\%$ in Group I, $29\%$ in Group II, $33\%$ in Group III). We could not find significant difference among three groups by IKDC scale. Conclusion : Comparing with other reports, our overall results were not satisfactory. And also, we could not find any remarkable difference among the three groups. Further research is necessary to evaluate new surgical approaches as well as improved techniques for capsular and collateral ligament injuries.

  • PDF

Graft selection in ACL reconstruction

  • Lee Dong-Cheol
    • 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2003.11a
    • /
    • pp.44-57
    • /
    • 2003
  • 1) Choice of graft selection : depends on surgeon's philosophy & experience, tissue availability(anatomical anomalies, prior surgery or injury) & patient activity level & desiers. patients - educated as to potential advantage & disadvantages of each choice available to them. No one graft has been shown to be overwhelmingly superior to another. 2) High demand individual (cutting, pivoting, jumping sports, skiing) - BPTB graft choice Lower demand or older individuals - hamstring reconstruction Allograft : older individuals(45 years old) sign of arthritis(compelling evidence of instability) individual who do not want their own tissue Prosthetic ligaments - long term results : disappointing

  • PDF