• 제목/요약/키워드: Automated External Defibrillator

검색결과 45건 처리시간 0.021초

119구급대에 의해 소생한 병원 전 심장정지 환자 1례 (Out-of-Hospital Resuscitation of Cardiac Arrest by 119 Emergency Medical Service System)

  • 윤형완;이재민;정지연
    • 한국화재소방학회논문지
    • /
    • 제24권5호
    • /
    • pp.142-149
    • /
    • 2010
  • 심폐소생술이란 인공호흡과 순환보조를 통하여 조직으로의 산소 공급을 유지하여 임상적 사망에서 생물학적 사망으로 진행을 막고, 심장박동과 순환을 회복시켜 환자를 소생시켜주는 술기이다. 심폐소생술이 시행되더라도 모든 심장정지 환자가 소생되는 것은 아니며, 얼마나 신속하고 정확하게 심폐소생술이 시행되었느냐에 따라 환자의 생존률이 결정된다. 현장에서 심장정지가 목격되지 않은 환자는 병원이송 전 현장에서 2분간 5주기 심폐소생술을 수행하고 자동제세동기를 사용하도록 하였고, 목격된 환자에게는 즉시 자동제세동기를 사용할 것을 권장하고 있으며 이후 전문적인 심장구조술이 필요하다. 병원 전 단계에서 119 구급대가 이송한 환자 중 자발순환회복(return of spontaneous circulation, ROSC)되어 이송하는 경우와 전문심장구조술을 시행 하는 경우는 매우 드물다. 현장에서 심장정지가 목격되었으나 심폐소생술이 시행되지 않았고 구급대원이 도착한 후 심폐소생술 시행 및 전문심장구조술로 현장에서 자발순환회복되어 생존퇴원한 1례를 경험하여 문헌고찰과 함께 보고하는 바이다.

119구급대에 의한 병원 전 임산부 심장정지 소생환자 1례 (Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Response to a Pregnant Woman by the 119 Emergency Medical Service System: A Case Study)

  • 이재민;홍수미;안국기;윤형완
    • 한국화재소방학회논문지
    • /
    • 제34권1호
    • /
    • pp.127-134
    • /
    • 2020
  • 임신부에서 심정지가 발생하였을 때, 가장 중요한 것은 임신부를 소생시키는 것이다. 임신부에서의 심정지는 산모와 태아를 동시에 고려해야 한다는 점 때문에 일반적인 심정지와 다른 부분이 있다. 임신부 심정지 환자에서는 태아를 분만해야 하는지를 결정하는 것은 산모와 태아 모두를 위하여 매우 중요하다. 심폐소생술이 수행되더라도 임신부 심정지 환자가 모두 소생되는 것은 아니며, 얼마나 신속하고 정확하게 심폐소생술이 시행되었느냐에 따라 환자의 생존율이 결정된다. 임신부 심정지 환자는 30세 목격당시 보호자에 의한 빠른 인지와 신속한 신고 및 목격자 심폐소생술이 이루어져 졌으며 119구급대에 의한 전문소생술이 적용되었고, 환자와 태아 모두 적절한 치료 후 6일 만에 건강하게 퇴원한 사례이다. 병원 전 단계에서 임신부 환자가 자발순환회복(Return of spontaneous circulation, ROSC)되어 이송하는 경우와 전문심장구조술을 시행 하는 경우는 매우 드물다. 임신부 심정지가 발생하여 목격자에 의한 심폐소생술과 119구급대원에 의한 전문심장소생술로 현장에서 자발순환회복되어 생존퇴원한 1례를 경험하여 문헌고찰과 함께 보고하는 바이다.

공항 지상 근무자의 심폐소생술 수행능력 (Performance Ability after CPR Education of the ground workers in an airport)

  • 신지훈
    • 한국응급구조학회지
    • /
    • 제13권3호
    • /
    • pp.29-40
    • /
    • 2009
  • Objective : This study is an experimental study which is designed to examine the differences between knowledge and self-confidence before and after theory education(CPR PPT material) based on guidelines of CPR and emergency cardiac treatment of American Heart Association(AHA, 2005) and video self-instruction program for the general public by Korean Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation(KACPR), trace CPR performance ability after CPR and AED education and investigate the accuracy of artificial respiration and chest compression, and know the difference in CPR performance abilities including AED. Methods : Subjects of this study include ground crews and staffs at M airport in G province equipped with emergency equipments for CPR according to Art. 47, Sec. 2 of Emergency Medical Law, airport police, rent-a-cops, security guard, quarantine officer, custom officer, and communication, electricity, civil engineering, facility management staff, airport fire fighting staff, air mechanic, traffic controller, and airport management team among airport facility management staffs. They were given explanation of necessity of research and 147 of 220 subjects who gave consent to this research but 73 who were absent from survey were excluded were used as subjects of this study. of 147 subjects, there were 102 men and 45 women. Results : 1) Knowledge score of CPR was $6.18{\pm}0.87$ before instruction and it was increased to $15.12{\pm}1.78$ after instruction, and there was statistically significant difference. 2) Self-confidence score in CPR was $3.16{\pm}0.96$ before instruction and it was increased to $7.05{\pm}0.75$ after instruction, and there was statistically significant difference. 3) Total average score in CPR performance ability after instruction was 7.46 out of 9, performance ability was highest in confirmation of response as 144(97.95%), follwed by request of help as 140(95.25%) and confirmation of respiration as 135(91.83%), and lowest in performing artificial respiration twice(gross elevation of chest) as 97(65.98%). Accuracy of artificial respiration(%) was $28.60{\pm}16.88$ and that of chest compression(%) was $73.10{\pm}22.16$. 4) Performance ability of AED after instruction showed proper performance in power on by 141(95.91%) and attaching pad by 135(91.83%), hand-off for analyzing rhythm showed 'accuracy' in 115(78.23%) and 'non-performance' in 32(21.77%), delivery of shock and hand-off confirmation showed 'accuracy' in 109(74.14%) and 'inaccuracy' in 38(25.86%), and beginning chest compression immediately after AED was done by 105(71.42%).

  • PDF

The Survey of Dentists: Updated Knowledge about Basic Life support and Experiences of Dental Emergency in Korea

  • Cho, Kyoung-Ah;Kim, Hyuk;Lee, Brian Seonghwa;Kwon, Woon-Yong;Kim, Mi-Seon;Seo, Kwang-Suk;Kim, Hyun-Jeong
    • 대한치과마취과학회지
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.17-27
    • /
    • 2014
  • Background: Various medical emergency situations can occur during dental practices. Cardiac arrest is known to comprise approximately 1% of emergency situation. Thus, it is necessary for dentists to be able to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to increase the chance of saving patient's life in emergency situation. In this paper, we conducted a survey study to evaluate to what extent dentists actually understood CPR practice and if they had experience in handling emergency situations in practice. Method: The survey was done for members of the Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology (KDSA), who had great interest in CPR and for whom survey-by-mail was convenient. We had selected 472 members of the KDSA with a dental license and whose office address and contact information were appropriate, and sent them a survey questionnaire by mail asking about the degree of their CPR understanding and if they had experience of handling emergency questions before. Statistical analyses -frequency analysis, chi-square test, ANOVA, and so on- were performed by use of IBM SPSS Statistics 19 for each question. Result: Among 472 people, 181 responded (38.4% response rate). Among the respondents were 134 male and 47 female dentists. Their average age was $40.4{\pm}8.4$. In terms of practice type, there were 123 private practitioners (68.0%), 20 professors (11.0%), 16 dentists-in-service (8.8%), 13 residents (specialist training) (7.2%) and 9 military doctors (5%). There were 125 dentists (69.1%) who were specialists or receiving training to be specialist, most of whom were oral surgeon (57, 31.5%) and pediatric dentists (56, 30.9%). There were 153 people (85.0%) who received CPR training before, and 65 of them (35.9%) were receiving regular training. When asked about the ratio of chest pressure vs mouth-to-mouth respiration when conducting CPR, 107 people (59.1%) answered 30:2. However, only 27.1% of them answered correctly for a question regarding CPR stages, C(Circulation)- A(Airway)- B(Breathing)- D(Defibrillation), which was defined in revised 2010 CPR practice guideline. Dentists who had experience of handling emergency situations in their practice were 119 (65.6%). The kinds of emergency situations they experienced were syncope (68, 37.6%), allergic reactions to local anesthetic (44, 24.3%), hyperventilation (43, 23.8%), seizure (25, 13.8%), hypoglycemia (15, 8.3%), breathing difficulty (14, 7.8%), cardiac arrest (11, 6.1%), airway obstruction (6, 3.3%), intake of foreign material and angina pectoris (4, 2.2%), in order of frequency. Most respondents answered that they handled the situation appropriately under the given emergency situation. In terms of emergency equipment they had blood pressure device (70.2%), pulse oximetry (69.6%), Bag-Valve-Mask (56.9%), emergency medicine (41.4%), intubation kit (29.8%), automated external defibrillator (23.2%), suction kit (19.3%) and 12 people (6.6%) did not have any equipment. In terms of confidence in handling emergency situation, with 1-10 point scale, their response was $4.86{\pm}2.41$ points. The average point of those who received regular training was $5.92{\pm}2.20$, while those who did not was $4.29{\pm}2.29$ points (P<0.001) Conclusion: The result showed they had good knowledge of CPR but the information they had was not up-to-date. Also, they were frequently exposed to the risk of emergency situation during their dental practice but the level of confidence in handling the emergency situation was intermediate. Therefore, regular training of CPR to prepare them for handling emergency situation is deemed necessary.

병원 밖에서 발생한 심인성 심장정지환자의 생존 관련 요인 7년간 국가심장정지조사사업 자료 활용 (The Factors Influencing Survival of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest with Cardiac Etiology)

  • 정수연;김철웅;홍성옥
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제17권2호
    • /
    • pp.560-569
    • /
    • 2016
  • 목적 병원 밖에서 발생한 심인성 심장정지 환자의 생존 관련 요인들을 알아보고, 우리나라 응급의료제도의 개선 방향에 대해 제안하고자 본 연구를 진행하였다. 연구방법 2006년부터 2012년까지 7년간 우리나라 119 구급대가 이송한 심장정지 환자 전수 자료 중 심인성 심장정지 환자 90,734명만을 분석 대상으로 하였다. 심장정지 조사 자료는 같은 지역 내 환자의 생존 여부가 상호 관련성이 있는 다층적 구조의 자료이므로, 이를 보정하기 위하여 환자-지역 2단계 다수준 분석을 실시하였다. 결과 본 연구에서 일반인에 의해 심폐소생술(Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, CPR)이 시행된 경우 그렇지 않은 경우에 비해 생존 퇴원 가능성이 1.40배, 병원 도착전에 제세동을 신속히 시행한 경우 생존퇴원 가능성이 2.98배 높았다. 병원별 응급의학 전문의 수를 5분위로 나누어 분석한 결과, 전문의수가 가장 적은 경우인 1분위를 기준으로 2분위인 경우 1.29배, 3분위인 경우 2.89배, 4분위인 경우 3.39배, 5분위인 경우 4.07배 생존퇴원 가능성이 높아지는 경향성을 나타냈다. 병원별 연평균 심장정지 환자수를 5분위로 나누어 분석한 결과, 심장정지 환자를 가장 적게 보는 병원인 1분위를 기준으로 각각 2분위인 경우 2.06배, 3분위인 경우 3.06배, 4분위인 경우 3.46배, 5분위인 경우 4.36배 생존퇴원 가능성이 높아지는 경향성을 나타냈다. 또 지역박탈지수를 5분위로 나누어 분석한 결과, 지역박탈지수가 가장 낮은 지역인 1분위를 기준으로 2분위인 경우 교차비가 0.96, 3분위인 경우 1.00, 4분위인 경우 0.72, 5분위인 경우 0.64를 보여 지역박탈지수가 높을수록 생존퇴원 가능성이 낮아지는 경향성을 보였다. 결론 일반인에 의해 CPR이 시행된 경우, 병원 도착 전에 제세동을 신속히 시행한 경우 생존 퇴원 가능성이 높아진다. 또 응급의학과 전문의 수가 많은 병원과 심장정지 환자를 많이 보는 병원에서 처치되었을 때, 지역 박탈지수가 낮을수록 생존 가능성이 높아지는 경향성을 나타냈다.