• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.47-52
• /
• 1999

The results of open capsular shift(Group 1) and arthroscopic trans glenoid Bankart repair(Group 2) for the recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder were compared. During a 4-year period, 25 patients were surgically treated. Fourteen shoulders had open Bankart procedure and capsular shift, and II shoulders were treated arthroscopically. A Bankart lesion was found in 12 out of 14 patients in Group I and all 11 patients in Group 2. Average follow-up period was 46 months for Group 1 and 23.4 months for Group 2. Group 1 showed 71.4% good to excellent results with 1 recurrent dislocation. Group 2 showed 90.9% good to excellent results with no recurrent dislocation. The cause of less favorable results of Group I compared with Group 2 was loss of external rotation postoperatively. The study showed that the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair was comparable to the open capsular shift in terms of stability, and the postoperative function was better than open capsular shift.

• 대한관절경학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.134-138
• /
• 2008

견관절 상완순 전후방(SLAP: Superior labrum anterior to posterior) 병변은 상부 관절와순 단독 손상으로 발견되기도 하고, 견관절 재발성 탈구 환자에서 전하방 관절와순의 파열, 즉 Bankart 병변의 연장으로 상부 관절와순까지 파열이 진행된 동반 손상으로 발생하기도 하며, 드물게 후방 Bankart 병변을 동반하는 경우도 있다. 여러 가지 병변과 동반된 SLAP 병변이 보고되어 왔으나 그 중 후방 Bankart 병변과 동반하여 발생한 후방 II형 SLAP 병변에 대한 보고는 미미하고 그 병변에 대한 관절경적 복원술 시 봉합 나사(suture anchor)의 삽입과 봉합에 주의할 점이 있다. 저자들은 투구 동작과 같은 흔한 손상 기전이 아닌 팔을 뻗친 상태에서 넘어지면서 발생한 외상으로 야기된 본 증례에 대해 관절경적 복원술을 시행하여 만족할 만한 결과를 얻었기에 보고하는 바이다.

• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.177-187
• /
• 2019

Objectives: The aim of this study was to report the clinical improvement of a patient who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair using a rehabilitation protocol involving Korean medicine. Methods: The patient was treated with acupuncture, cupping, Korean Medicine, Chuna therapy, and Doin exercise therapy during the admission period. To estimate the patient's status, we used the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Pain Disability Index (PDI), assessments of the range of motion (ROM) and Muscle Manual Test (MMT) for the shoulder joint. Results: After administering the abovementioned treatments, we found that the patient's NRS, PDI, and ROM and MMT for the shoulder joint were improved. Conclusions: The rehabilitation protocol involving Korean medicine can be applied to and produce good results for patients who undergo arthroscopic repair for Bankart lesions. The limitation of the study was that the number of cases we studied was insufficient to prove the effectiveness. Hence, further studies are needed for designing the rehabilitation protocol involving Korean medicine.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.110-117
• /
• 2002

Purpose: We compared the results of open and arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic recurrent anterior dislocation ,3f the shoulder. Materials and methods: We analysed 7 cases underwent open Bankart repair (group I) and 13 cases underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair (group Ⅱ). The average follow-up period was 68.1 months (51-113 months) in group I and 41.1 months (16~57 months) in group Ⅱ. All patients in group I and Ⅱ were non-athletes. We analyzed statistically objective evaluation, such as the stability of shoulder joint, the range of motion, pain, impaired throwing, Bankart rating system by Rowe and subjective evaluation, visual analog scale (VAS) between two groups. Results: In terms of dominant and non-dominant shoulders, the age at initial episode of dislocation, the elapsed time from injury to surgery, the number of preoperative dislocations associated with susceptibility to apprehension. respectively, there was no statistically significant differences between two groups. In group I the average Rowe's scortls was 84.3 and 3 cases (43%) had excellent results,4 cases (S7cfo), good ones. In group H the average Rowe's scores was 87.3 and 7 cases (54%) had excellent results,6 cases, good ones. There was tendency to show more excellent results in group ll, but there was no statistically significant differences. The average VAS were 90.3 points in group I and 88 points in group Ⅱ, which showed also no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Open and arthroscopic Bankart repairs had no significant difference and showed also good results in travinatic recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.178-182
• /
• 2020

Background: The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes and radiological findings of cyst formation in the glenoid around suture anchors after arthroscopic Bankart repair with either biocomposite suture anchor or all-suture anchor in traumatic anterior shoulder instability. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in clinical and radiological outcomes between the two suture materials. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 162 patients (69 in group A, biocomposite anchor; 93 in group B, all-suture anchor) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with less than 20% glenoid defect on preoperative en-face view three-dimensional computed tomography. Patient assignment was not randomized. Results: At final follow-up, the mean subjective shoulder value, Rowe score, and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score improved significantly in both groups. However, there were no significant differences in functional shoulder scores and recurrence rate (6%, 4/69 in group A; 5%, 5/93 in group B) between the two groups. On follow-up magnetic resonance arthrography/computed tomography arthrography, the incidence of peri-anchor cyst formation was 5.7% (4/69) in group A and 3.2% (3/93) in group B, which was not a significant difference. Conclusions: Considering the low incidence of peri-anchor cyst formation in the glenoid after Bankart repair with one of two anchor systems and the lack of association with recurrence instability, biocomposite and all-suture anchors in Bankart repair yield satisfactory outcomes with no significant difference.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.157-169
• /
• 1999

외상성 전방 견관절 불안정성을 가진 88명의 환자의 견관절 89례에 대해 봉합나사를 이용한 관절경적 또는 개방적 Bankart 봉합술을 시행하고 평균 39개월 후에 Rowe와 UCLA 점수, 재발율, 일상생활로의 복귀, 그리고 운동 범위 등을 평가하였다. 관절경적 수기는 최소한 3개의 봉합나사를 이용하였고, 관절낭의 중첩과 상방 이동술을 동시에 실시하였다. 개방적 Bankart 봉합술을 시행 받은 견관절30례 중 26례(86.6%)에서, 관절경적 Banltart 봉합술을 시행한 견관절 49례 중 44례(91.5%)에서 매우 우수(excellent) 또는 우수(good)을 나타내었다. 관절경적 시술을 받은 그룹에서 Rowe (P=0.041)와 VCLA 점수(P=0.026)는 더 좋은 결과를 보였다. 각각의 그룹에서 재탈구는 2례가 발생했다. 두 그룹사이에 외회전 소실이나 이전 생활로의 복귀에서는 의미 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(P〉0.05). 수술 후 불안정은 봉합나사의 수가 적었던 환자들의 그룹에서 훨씬 더 많이 나타났다. 봉합나사를 이용한 관절경적 관절낭 봉합술은 개방적 Bankart봉합술에 비해 같거나 또는 더 좋은 결과를 보였다.

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.135-141
• /
• 2008

목적: 비매듭 금속 봉합 나사못(knotless metal suture anchor)을 이용한 관절경적 방카트(Bankart) 복원술의 임상적 및 방사선학적 결과를 비교하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2001년 2월부터 2005년 1월까지 비매듭 봉합 나사못을 이용하여 관절경적 방카트 복원술을 시행하였고 1년 이상 추시 가능했던 68예를 대상으로 하였다. 술 후 평균 추시 기간은 34개월이었다. 평가는 Rowe score, 관절 운동 범위, 주관적 시각 척도(VAS)에 의한 통증 정도를 측정하였으며 수술 전 후 방사선학적 결과와 비교하였다. 결과: Rowe scoring system에서 술 전 43.3에서 술 후 95.6로 평가되었다. 관절운동범위는 최종 추시시 정상 팔에 비해서 거의 차이는 없었다. 주관적 시각 척도에 의한 통증의 정도는 술 전 3.3에서 술 후 0.5로 측정되었다. 방사성 저음영선은 약 15예에서 관찰되었다. 15예 중 2예에서 재탈구 및 나사못 관절병증으로 재수술을 시행하였고 Odds Ratio상 2.6배의 견관절 불안정성을 호소하였다. 결론: 비매듭 봉합 나사못을 이용한 방카트 복원술은 유용한 방법이나 외래 추시 중 나타나는 나사못 주위의 방사성 저음영선은 불량한 예후를 암시할 수 있기 때문에 주의가 필요하겠다.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.167-171
• /
• 2015

Humeral head chondrolysis has been widely reported as a devastating complication after arthroscopic shoulder surgery; however little is known about post-arthroscopic humeral head osteonecrosis. We experienced a 66-year-old female patient with rapidly progressive osteonecrosis of the humeral head only seven months after arthroscopic Bankart and rotator cuff repair. The patient had no systemic risk factors for osteonecrosis. A satisfactory result was achieved with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for severe humeral head destruction and an irreparable massive rotator cuff tear. Shoulder surgeons should be aware of such severe complication, perform routine radiographs, and pay close attention to the presence of constant pain or loss of motion after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

• 대한견주관절학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한견주관절학회 1999년도 학술대회
• /
• pp.61-61
• /
• 1999

• 대한견주관절학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한견주관절학회 1997년도 학술대회
• /
• pp.171-171
• /
• 1997