• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 1998

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative success and stability of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstructions using the central one third bone patellar tendon bone(BPB) autograft versus a quadrupled semitendinosus/gracilis(ST) autograft in patients with "isolated" ACL tears. Materials & Methods : A strict criteria to identify isolated ACL tears was used which included : no previous surgery, no other ligamentous injury, no history of patellofemoral symptoms, no patellofemoral malalignment, no meniscal pathology, no chondromalacia or chondral injury and no limitation of motion of the injured knee. 30 patients (15 BPB, 15 ST) with a mean age of 27.4 years were available for a mean follow up of 18 months (between 12 months and 26 months). Preoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age, sex and degree of laxity. Results : Postoperatively, we couldn't find significant differences between the two groups with respect to subjective Lysholm score, objective laxity including Lachman test, pivot shift test and KT-2000 measurements. Mean side to side difference of KT-2000 scores at 20lbs were 1.5mm for the BPB group and 1.4mm for the ST group. Positive Lachman test was found in 26.7% and 33.3% and positive pivot shift was found in 20% and 33.3% of the patients in the BPB and ST groups, respectively. Anterior knee pain (33.3%) was more common in the BPB group. There were 80% of the patients in both groups above nearly normal grade according to the IKDC grade. Conclusions : In patients with "isolated" ACL tears, the overall results, ligamentous stability for the patellar tendon and the quadrupled semitendinosus/gracilis were comparable. We consider that the quadrupled autogenous hamstring tendon is a good alternative substitute in ACL reconstruction together with the bone patellar tendon bone.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.107-113
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with single bundle, single-incision technique using Achilles tendon and tibialis anterior allograft with ligament remnant preservation. Materials and Methods: Twenty six patients underwent PCL reconstruction was included. There were 21 males and 5 females. Mean age was 32 years. Used graft was a fresh frozen Achilles tendon allograft (group I, 14 cases) and tibialis anterior allograft (group II, 12 cases). Arthroscopic PCL reconstruction was performed using transtibial, single-incision and single bundle technique with remnant preserving as possible. For clinical evaluation, range of motion, posterior drawer test, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade and posterior stress radiograph were used. The mean follow-up period was 21.6 months (12-40 months). Associated injuries were 5 medial collateral ligament injuries, which were treated by conservative method. Results: Range of motion (ROM) was returned to normal range in 24 cases, but ROM deficit under $10^{\circ}$ flexion was 2 cases at final follow-up period. Preoperative posterior drawer test was 17 cases in grade II and 9 cases in grade III. At final follow-up 13 cases returned within normal grade, 7 cases grade I and 6 cases grade II posterior instability. Lysholm mean score was improved from preoperatively 62 to 90 at final follow-up period. Tegner activity mean scale improved from preoperatively 3.5 to 5.6 at final follow-up period. IDKC grade was grade A was 3 cases, grade B 17 cases, grade C 6 cases. In posterior stress radiograph, posterior displacement was improved from mean 12 mm preoperative to 4.5 mm at final follow-up. There were no statistical differences between two groups in clinical evaluations. There were two cases of re-rupture of graft at the bone-tendon junction in group I. Conclusion: We had successful results of PCL reconstruction with single-incision, single bundle technique using Achilles and tibialis anterior allograft without difference between two groups in patients with PCL injury. There were more re-rupture of graft in Achilles tendon group.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2002

Purpose : Evaluation and analysis of the incidence and causes of intraoperative and postoperative complications after arthoscopic anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction using bone-patella. tendon-bone (BPTB) auto graft. Materials and Methods : We reviewed 85 cases of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using BPTB autograft which had been followed up for more than 1 year. Intraoperative complications had been recorded and corrected during the operation. Postoperative complications were analyzed and compared between 3 groups which were classified by the last follow-up period after the operation. Results : There were a few intraoperative complications including patellar fracture(1 case), contamination of harvested graft(1 case), impingement of graft(2 cases), blow-out of tile posterior wall of the femoral tunnel(1 case) and intraarticular retraction of the screw(1 case). The result of the comparison of postoperative complications among the groups shows that the incidence of anterior knee pain, donor site pain and patellofemoral crepitation were significantly decreased after 2 years. But there was no significant decrease in these complications after 3 years. Conclusion : Intraoperative complications after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using BPTB autograft were due to incorrect technique and carelessness of the operation team, and can be prevented by improvement of surgical technique and accumulation of experience. Postoperative complication were somewhat unavoidable but gradually improved with time; hence, we should consider it for the selection of graft donor.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2009

Purpose: To evaluate the 2 to 4-year follow-up results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using transtibial femoral tunnel at 10 or 2 O'clock position. Materials and Methods: Eighty-six ACL reconstructions could be evaluated. Evaluations included 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, Lachman test, Pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer measurement, 2000 IKDC knee examination and second-look arthroscopy. Results: Seventy-five patients (87.2%) had over 80 in 2000 IKDC subjective knee score. Eighty-three patients (96.5%) had 1+firm end or negative Lachmann test. Seventy-eight patients (90.7%) had a negative Pivot-shift test. Eighty-three patients (96.5%) had less than 5 mm difference by KT-1000 arthrometer. Eighty patients (93.0%) were normal or nearly normal by 2000 IKDC knee examination. Second-look arthroscopy was done in fifteen cases. Nine cases showed good synovialization, four cases showed partial synovialization, two cases showed poor synovialization and graft failure was noted in one case. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction using transtibial femoral tunnel at 10 or 2 O'clock position resulted in a good outcome in terms of rotatory stability as well as antero-posterior stability.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.187-191
• /
• 2006

Few cases have been reported in which the femoral interference screw has migrated into the posterior compartment after an ACL reconstruction. It usually requires removal, because it leads usually to mechanical symptom. However, the arthroscopic removal of a screw is a technically demanding procedure, especially in the case of an intact integrated ACL graft or one that is encapsulated around the screw. We present a case in which a displaced femoral interference screw migrated within the posterior compartment 11 years postoperatively, after the graft had been successfully incorporated at the femoral site and showed good continuity on MRI and arthroscopic examination. Although it is often technically challenging, through the use of a posterior trans-septal portal, we can successfully remove a displaced femoral interference screw even in the most difficult locations in the posterior compartment without damage to ACL graft.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.143-147
• /
• 2005

Purpose: In case of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, graft tendon is generally fixed in tibial tunnel with knee extended. When reconstructing ACL using hamstring tendon, the authors aim to find out the effect of knee joint position during graft fixation on postoperative knee joint stability and range of motion. Materials and Methods: Prospective study was done on patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon from May 2002 to January 2003 We used Rigifix system (Mitek Product, Johnson and Johnson, USA) and Intrafix system for fixation. Thirty nine patients received ACL reconstruction during this period. Excluding 2 patients lost in the follow-up, 37 patients were analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 14 months $(13{\sim}25months)$. Knee position was decided alternatively without any bias. Clinical evaluation was based on Lachman test, pivot shift test, Lysholm score, IKDC(international knee documentation committee) assessment and side to side KT-1000 maximal manual arthrometer difference. Results: After the last follow-up, average postoperative Lysholm score was 93.1 poins(65-98points). According to IKDC score, 26 cases were normal, 10 cases were nearly normal, 1 case was abnormal and we had no case of severe abnormality. The mean difference from the normal side was 2.5 mm under maximal manual loading KT-1000 arthrometer. According to postoperative Lachman test, 32 cases were normal,2 cases were grade I and 1 case was grade II. There were 34 cases of normal, 2 cases of grade I and 1 case of grade II. When using maximal manual KT-1000 arthrometer side to side difference, the difference from the normal side while fixing the tibia at 20'knee flexion was 2.3 mm and at full extention the difference was 2.7 mm. The range of motion at postoperative 1 year showed 5 degree flexion contracture in 1 case at 20 degrees knee flexion and 10 degrees of flexion limitation was observed in 2 cases at full extension. Conclusion: When ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon, anterior laxity showed no difference in its stability between two groups. Tibial side fixation at full extension may be helpful in preventing flexion contracture due to overconstrained graft tendon.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.92-98
• /
• 2007

Purpose: We evaluated the clinical results of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon with tibial remnant-preserving technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five cases were evaluated from Feb, 2003 to May, 2006. The average interval from injury to surgery was $2.6{\pm}1.6$ months. The cause of injury was mostly sports-related trauma. The average follow-up period was 17 months. Tibial remnant was preserved as much as possible and caution was taken not to damage the remnant during ACL reconstruction. Postoperative rehabilitation was the same as the usual rehabilitation method after ACL reconstruction, except for delaying motion for 2 weeks with an extension locking brace. Clinical evaluation was performed using ROM; Lachman test; pivot-shift test; anterior displacement measurement using KT-2000 arthrometer; Lysholm score and proprioception measured by single limb standing test. Results: There was no limitation of knee motion without contracture. The Lachman test and pivot-shift test were both negative. The side-to-side difference of anterior displacement measured using KT-2000 arthrometer was improved from 6.7 mm to 2.2 mm. The average Lysholm score improved from 81 to 96. The single limb standing test for proprioceptive evaluation showed no significant difference from a normal leg. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with tibial remnant-preserving technique can preserve mechanoreceptors with prorioception and expect good functional recovery.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.45-49
• /
• 2006

목적: 자가 골-슬개건-골과 슬괵건을 이용한 전방 십자 인대 재건술의 5년 중기 추시 결과를 비교 분석하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 전방 십자 인대 재건술을 시행한 후 5년 이상 추시 관찰이 가능한 65예를 대상으로 하였고, 골-슬개건-골이 38예, 슬괵건이 27예였다. 술 후 평가는 Lysholm 점수, 관절 운동 범위, 대퇴부 중간 부위 둘레 길이, Lachman 검사, 축 이동 검사, KT 2000 관절 계측기를 시행하였고, 술 후 합병증을 평가하였다. 결과: Lysholm 점수는 골-슬개건-골군과 슬괵건국에서 각각 평균 91점, 94.2점으로 슬괵건군이 우수하였고, 대퇴부 중간 부위 둘레 길이는 건측에 비해 각각 평균 1.7cm, 1.3cm의 차이를 보였다. 양 군간에 관절 운동 범위, Lachman 검사, 축 이동 검사 및 KT 2000 관절 계측 결과는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 술 후 합병증은 과도한 보행이나 운동 후 슬관절 동통이 골-슬개건-골군에서 7예, 슬괵건 군에서 4예 관찰되었고, 전방 슬관절 동통이 골-슬개건-골군에서 4예 관찰되어, 골-슬개건-골군에서 더 많이 발생하였다. 결론: 5년 중기 추시에서 자가 슬괵건군이 우수한 슬관절 기능, 적은 합병증 등 임상적으로 우수하였으나 장기 추시가 요할 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.87-96
• /
• 2009

최근 전방십자인대 손상의 치료에 남아있는 인대 다발이 이식건의 생물학적 치유를 도우며 고유 수용감각(proprioception) 기능을 유지할 뿐만 아니라 슬관절의 전방 전위 억제의 생역학적 기능을 가지는 것으로 연구되고 있다. 이러한 이론을 바탕으로 남아있는 전방십자인대를 보존하는 노력들은 다양하게 시도되고 있다. 전방십자인대 손상의 자연 경과는 아직도 논란이 되고 있으나 선택적인 환자에 있어서 보존적 치료는 비교적 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있으므로 불필요한 재건술을 줄일 수 있다. 최근 시도되고 있는 선택적 다발 재건술 및 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 전방십자인대 재건 수술 수기들은 다양한 방법으로 시도되고 있으며 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 장점이 있으나 협소한 적응증을 가진다. 저자들의 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 전방십자인대 재건술은 자가 슬괵건을 이용한 단일다발 재건술을 시행하면서 잔존하는 이완된 다발에 봉합사를 통과시킨 후 봉합사를 추가적인 터널 없이 bioabsorbable cross pin (RIGIDfix system, Mitek, Johnson & Johnson, USA) 구멍을 통하여 당기고 고정하는 방법이다. 전방십자인대 재건술시 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 방법은 이식건의 생물학적 치유을 촉진하고 또한 경골 부착부에 남아있는 기계수용체를 보존하므로 기능적 회복에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다. 저자들의 방법은 비교적 광범위한 적응증을 가지며 적은 합병증으로 남아있는 다발을 효과적으로 보존할 수 있는 술식으로 전방십자인대 수술시 좋은 치료 선택의 하나로 사료된다.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.97-101
• /
• 1999

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to prevent thc graft-tunnel mismatch by measuring the patellar tendon length, intertunnel distance, tibial tunnel length and by obtaining appropriate bone block length. Materials and Methods : Authors analyzed 15 patients who had taken the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from March 1997 to June 1999. Tibial guide was always set on the "endo" $40^{\circ}$ position(Acufex, MA, USA). We measured the following indices, intertunnel distance(X), tibial tunnel length(T), patellar tendon length(N), tibia bone plug length(Y). Both of the femoral tunnel length(F) and the patellar bone plug length(P) were made in 25mm. The appropriate tibial bone plug length was simply calculated by subtracting the patellar tendon length from the sum of the intertunnel distance and thc tibial tunnel length(Y=X+T-N). Results : The average indices were as follows ; the intertunnel distance(X) was $23.4{\pm}1.4mm$, the tibial tunnel length(T) was $43.6{\pm}1.7mm$, the patellar tendon length was $40{\pm}2.4mm$, and the tibia bone plug length was $27{\pm}2.4mm$. Conclusion : In authors' endoscopic technique, establishment of individually determined optimal tibial bone plug length, based on total tunnel length and patellar tendon length could prevent the problem of graft-tunnel mismatch.