• Title/Summary/Keyword: Arm motion artifact

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Correction of Artifacts due to Patient Arm Motion in PET/CT: Scatter-Limit Correction (PET/CT 검사에서 움직임에 의한 인공물의 산란제한보정법 적용 영상 평가)

  • Bahn, Young Kag;Lee, Seung Jae;Kim, Jung Yul;Oh, Sin Hyun;Nam-Koong, Hyuk;Park, Hoon-Hee;Kang, Chun Koo;Lim, Han Sang;Lee, Chang Ho
    • The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
    • /
    • v.16 no.2
    • /
    • pp.44-48
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose : Arm motion can give rise to striking cold artifact on PET/CT. We investigated that evaluation of scatter-limit correction and correct the patient arm motion artifact in Discovery 600 PET/CT. Materials and Methods : To evaluate a radioactivity uptake (Bq/ml) and a standard uptake value (SUV), the scatter limit correction and scatter correction were compared using 1994 NEMA Phantom$^{TM}$ in Discovery 600 PET/CT (GE Healthcare, Mi, We). Arm motion phantom study was involved a central 20 cm diameter cylinder simulating the neck and 2 peripheral 10 cm diameter cylinders simulating arms. The positions of the arms were altered so as to introduce different amounts of misalignment. The evaluation of arm motion phantom study used the radioactivity uptake and SUV in scatter correction and scatter limit correction. Results : The statistical significance of radioactivity uptake and SUV did not show the differences in comparisons of the scatter limit correction and the scatter correction that not show (p<0.05). Radioactivity uptake of the scatter correction was up to 3.1 kBq/ml in the 0.04 kBq/ml. It was approximately 98.7% undervalued in the arm motion phantom study. However, Radioactivity uptake of the scatter limit correction was up to 3.0 kBq/ml in the 2.11 kBq/ml. It was approximately 30% undervalued in arm motion phantom study. SUV of the scatter correction was 1.05 to 0.006 and underestimated about 98%. However, an applying SUV of the scatter limit correction changed the value as 0.67 which is underestimated about 25%. Radioactivity uptake and SUV of the scatter limit correction was increased approximately 60%, or more than the scatter correction. Conclusion : It is considered that if the patient arm motion artifact was occurred the scatter limit correction will be applicable to give an accurate diagnosis.

  • PDF