• 기록학연구
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.3-40
• /
• 2002

Appraisal is a basic archival function that analyzes values of records and determines the eventual disposal of records based upon their archival values. In Korea, this appraisal concept introduces in earnest through Public Records and Archives Act(PRA, 공공기관의 기록물관리에관한법률) with which Korean record management systems settle inflexibly. In theoreical and methodological area, therefore, it is necessary to analyze appraisal system in this Act with it in archival science. In PRA Act, appraisal system is founded on the Tables of Transaction for Records Scheduling(TRS, 기록물분류기준표) through which disposal activities of all records are definited in a concrete form. In this system, selection of archival materials which has been recognized as a important function of record center is carried out by record creators and archival institutions; Primary value between semi-currenty and non-currenty are reflected at the same time. In view of values, this appraisal system intends to separate reasonably consideration for continuing utility of achives from current use of records throughout agencies duration. Ultimately, appraisal based upon TRS makes up not separated management course but organic courses reflecting the Continuum of Care. Of course, this appraisal system makes up the deficiency partially. TRS regarded as 'mainboard' of current appraisal system will have to be enacted elaborately. And appraisal strategies of electronic records must set up in detail in PRA Act and TRS. Lastly, arrangement and description concepts immanent in TRS will have to supplement in archival institutions.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제80호
• /
• pp.167-196
• /
• 2024

이 글은 기록학계의 현 국가아카이브 체제에 대한 해체와 재구성 논의 검토를 통해 아카이브와 기록학의 전환 필요성을 주장하였다. 시민사회 '기록활동' 사례를 '국가아카이브 기록현장' 사례와 극명하게 대비시킴으로써 현 아카이브 체제에 대한 미시적 관점에서의 해결 과제를 제시하고자 했다. 그리고 이 과정에서 역사기록을 중심으로 하는 기록학 연구방법론의 전환 필요성을, 아카이브 접근성을 보장하기 위한 기록정보 조직화와 계층기술 등에 대한 인식 심화와 정책 전환의 의미와 관련지어서 도출해보았다.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.19-40
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 변화하는 기록관리 환경에 대응할 수 있는 역량을 갖춘 기록관리 전문직 양성제도 혁신 방안을 모색하는 데 목적을 둔다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 해외 기록관리 전문직 양성·자격제도를 통해 시사점을 찾고, 우리나라 기록관리 전문직 자격제도와 비교 분석했다. 또한, 국내 기록관리학 대학원의 일반 현황과 교원의 연구실적을 분석하여, 상당수 교원들이 기록관리학에 대한 학술적 관심이 낮으며 학교별 격차가 상당한 점을 확인했다. 이를 바탕으로, 교수연구자와 현장전문가를 대상으로 인터뷰를 진행하여, 기록관리 전문직 양성제도 개선에 대한 의견을 수렴했다. 결론에 갈음하며, 본 연구는 기록공동체 거버넌스 체계 구성과 자율규제력 확보라는 선행과제를 제시하고, 대학원 교육 가이드라인 제정, 계속-심화교육체계 수립, 교육원의 발전적 전환을 3대 과제로 하는 기록관리 전문직 양성제도 혁신방안을 제안한다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제2호
• /
• pp.49-76
• /
• 2000

The government is pushing hard to realize the electronic and knowledge government. In connection with the efforts most public institutions have already started adopting the electronic document management system(EDMS), and have entered in a phase of modification of, and supplement to the system for the flow of the electronic documents among the agencies to be made possible by the month of November this year. The present situation is that the modification and supplement of EDMS are underway in the field that is unrelated to the records and archival management, what has been foreseen in the academic world of archival science. Under this circumstances the article places emphasis on the importance of the positive participation of the archivists in the development of the EDMS. To be concrete it reveals how the archival achievements can be practically applicable to the EDMS. What is particularly conspicuous in the article is the detailed description of how usefully control of record production, classification and description, evaluation and selection that are put into practice in the archival management law can be embodied in the development of the EDMS. Finally the article put emphasis on the positive exchanges and integration to bring the archival management science and computer science, archival management law and electronic government law, the archival management agencies and the agencies in charge of the electronic government together into whole to find a way for the methodical achievements of scientific archival management to be positively applicable to the electronic document management system(EDMS).

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제25권
• /
• pp.225-256
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study is to find the ways that will be helpful to improve archival system and to establish National Archives. The contents of this study were focused on comparing the characteristics of archival system in governmental administration,: Executive, Legislature, and Judiciary. They were also focused on analyzing the problems of those current system. This research was basically conducted depending on the detailed articles of the legislation and regulation pertinent to the archives. Two major results of the research are 1) There are much differences among the governmental administrations in structuring and organizing for archival administrations. Archival works of government document are divided primarily according to the period of conservation and it is necessary to establish the regional archives and central management system, and to employ archivists as an expert staff. 2) The principles and methods of archival process, such as transferences, classifications, preservations, access, and destructions are similar to each other. In order to improve and co-ordinate current systems, it is necessary to constitute several councils endowed with consultative and decision-making power.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제13호
• /
• pp.91-134
• /
• 2006

일반적으로 사적(私的)영역에서 수집되는 기록물, 즉 매뉴스크립트는 물리적 상태가 불량하고 기록물의 전후 맥락과 생산이력에 대한 정보가 파편적으로 수집되는 경우가 대부분이다. 때문에 수집형 기록관에서는 다양한 경로로 수집되는 기록물에 대한 생산기관(생산자)명을 효과적으로 통제하고 기록물 생산배경을 이해할 때 핵심요소인 출처정보를 축적할 필요가 있다. 수집형 기록관에서 이러한 전거제어와 출처정보 관리는 수집부터 체계화되어야 하며, 이는 수집시 관리과정까지 고려하여 필요한 정보를 구축하는 것을 의미한다. 이 논문은 민주화운동기념사업회 사료관이 개발한 사료관리시스템 가운데 전거제어 방식을 소개함으로써 수집형 기록관의 전거제어 및 출처정보 축적의 필요성을 확인하고 기록물 전거시스템을 구축할 때 고려할 사항들을 제안하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 사료관리에서 전거제어의 필요성을 알아보고, 사료전거제어 기준과 실무절차, 구축과정에 대해 살펴보았다. 사료관 사료전거시스템의 특징은 수집, 등록, 기술 등 각 업무 흐름에 따라 전거를 제어하고 출처정보를 관리하여 이를 사료의 지적 관리와 검색도구로 이용한다는 것에 있다. 끝으로 이러한 전거관리 사례를 통해 국제표준인 ISAAR(CPF)를 준용하여 기관마다 적합한 형태로 기술요소를 재구성하고 전거파일 유형을 설정하여 표준적으로 관리해야 할 것을 제안함으로써 향후 수집형 기록관에서 기록물 전거시스템을 구축하는데 있어 참고할 수 있도록 하였다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제11호
• /
• pp.144-180
• /
• 2005

Automation can help organisations implement authentic and reliable record management practices, through the improved tracking of records through their life cycle as well as the consistent application of records schedules and descriptive standards. Maintaining evidence through authentic and reliable records is a cornerstone of good business practice and helps ensure a valuable record for society. This paper provided understanding of establishing records and archives management system(ARMS) with the case of the Jogye order of Korean buddhism. This system was designed to control records in the whole step from creation to preservation so that it automatized process to organize and control current records and to preserve archives. This system covers a wide range of archival functions including appraisal, arrangement and description, transfers, access, location and space management, microfilm management and destruction. This system will be applied records management of similar organization because of designing from the archival scientific point of view. Also, development process of this system will help archivist to build ARMS based on archival needs of institution.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제17호
• /
• pp.115-156
• /
• 2008

공공기관의 활동과 관련하여 생성된 행정박물은 문자로는 표현할 수 없는 상징성, 역사성 및 심미성과 함께 형상물로서의 가치가 크기 때문에 향후 전시 및 활용의 가치가 높다. 우리나라에서는 지난 2006년 "기록관리혁신 종합실천계획"을 통해 행정박물을 공공기록으로 인식하고 그에 대한 적극적인 관리의지를 표명하였다. 이와 함께 개정 기록관리법에서는 행정박물 역시 업무와 관련하여 생산 접수한 기록물의 범주에 포함시킴으로써, 모든 공공기관에서 행정박물을 관리케 할 수 있는 기반을 마련하였다. 행정박물을 기록으로 인식하고 관리의지를 명문화했다는 점은 이전과는 다른 개혁적 의도로 볼 수 있지만, 행정박물에 대한 개념 규정 및 이를 체계적으로 관리 보존할 수 있게 하는 방안은 아직 미비한 상태이다. 이에 본고에서는 행정박물 관리체계 구축방안 마련을 위한 일환으로, 행정박물의 유형분류 및 평가 문제를 고찰하였다. 행정박물의 관리체계 구축을 위해서는 우선적으로 행정박물에 대한 명확한 개념 규정 및 구체적인 유형 파악이 선행되어야 한다는 전제 하에, 실제 조사자료 및 현행 유관법령을 기반으로 행정박물의 정의 및 유형분류를 시도하였다. 또한 공공기관의 업무와 관련하여 생산 활용되는 물품 중 어떠한 대상을 행정박물로 획득하여 관리할 것인가를 고찰하기 위해, 행정박물 선별 상의 특성을 분석하였다. 이를 바탕으로 우리나라 행정박물 선별 체제 및 영구보존 대상 선별기준 마련을 위한 방안을 제시하였다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.161-223
• /
• 2002

Let me conclusion the regulation of the archival management organizations and it's development From the 1894(甲午改革) First, the archival management organizations(記錄局, 總務局) had been made in the office of prime ministry(議政府) and each ministry, which had managed the records and archives in the era of 1894. Second, the archival management organizations had been changed by the beginning of cabinet system from the march of 1895. They had been divided into three parts. One(參事官室) had managed the current records Another one(記錄局) had managed the compilation. Third, from the 1896(俄館播遷) to 1904(露日戰爭), the archival management organizations had been returned to old system of the era of 1894. I mean that the records management ministry(文書課) and the one (記錄局) had been reduced to the small office each other. For more effect research, I studied from the archival aspect. So I focused the archival institution (記錄局, 記錄課) and the related regulations(各府各衛門通行規則)in the era of 甲午改革. My conclusion is they had introduced directly from the regulations(各省官制通則) of Japan. And I did find the related regulations of some agencies (內部, 度支部, 宮內府 奎章閣). From the research of these regulations, I concluded these had been introduced directly from the regulations of Japan, too.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제10호
• /
• pp.324-370
• /
• 2004

This paper aims to research the historical development of the archival systems in the Soviet Union from 1917 to the 1920's. The Russian revolution was the turning point not only for the political and social changes but for the archival administration in Russia, as it provided the new Soviet regime with the chances to reorganize the archival institutions under Bolshevik rule. However, we must not forget the fact that the Russian Archival Workers' Union had taken part in the organization of the archival systems together with the Bolshevik revolutionaries. The Soviet government intended to transform the decentralized and poorly organized archival systems in the prerevolutionary years into the centralized and bureaucratized ones. In this meaning, the decree signed be V. I. Lenin on 1 June 1918 was estimated as the real basis for the Soviet archival centralization. Lenin's archival decree of 1918 encompassed the entire national documentary legacy, which was gradually extended to all types and categories of manuscripts and archival records by successive legislation. The concept of state proprietorship of all documentary records was designated "Single State Archival Fond"(Edinyi Gosudarstvennyi arkhivnyi fond), which was renamed as "Archival Fond of the Russian Federation" after the collapse of the USSR. The independent state administrative agency, that is, "Main Administration of Archival Affairs"(Glavnoe upravlenie arkhivnym delom) was charged with the management of the entire "Single State Archival Fond". While the Soviet Union reorganized its archival systems in the twenties, the archival institutions became under the severe control of the government. For example, M. N. Pokrovskii, the well-known Marxist historian and the political leader, headed the organizational work of archives in the Soviet Union, which resulted in the exclusion of the prerevolutionary specialists from the archival field in the Soviet Union. However, the discussions over the concept of "the Archival Fond" by B. I. Anfilov helped to develop the archival theories in the USSR in the twenties. In conclusion, the Soviet Union, having emphasized the centralization of the archives, developed its archival systems from the early period, which were the basis of the systematic archival institutions in Russia.