• 기록학연구
• /
• 제10호
• /
• pp.324-370
• /
• 2004

This paper aims to research the historical development of the archival systems in the Soviet Union from 1917 to the 1920's. The Russian revolution was the turning point not only for the political and social changes but for the archival administration in Russia, as it provided the new Soviet regime with the chances to reorganize the archival institutions under Bolshevik rule. However, we must not forget the fact that the Russian Archival Workers' Union had taken part in the organization of the archival systems together with the Bolshevik revolutionaries. The Soviet government intended to transform the decentralized and poorly organized archival systems in the prerevolutionary years into the centralized and bureaucratized ones. In this meaning, the decree signed be V. I. Lenin on 1 June 1918 was estimated as the real basis for the Soviet archival centralization. Lenin's archival decree of 1918 encompassed the entire national documentary legacy, which was gradually extended to all types and categories of manuscripts and archival records by successive legislation. The concept of state proprietorship of all documentary records was designated "Single State Archival Fond"(Edinyi Gosudarstvennyi arkhivnyi fond), which was renamed as "Archival Fond of the Russian Federation" after the collapse of the USSR. The independent state administrative agency, that is, "Main Administration of Archival Affairs"(Glavnoe upravlenie arkhivnym delom) was charged with the management of the entire "Single State Archival Fond". While the Soviet Union reorganized its archival systems in the twenties, the archival institutions became under the severe control of the government. For example, M. N. Pokrovskii, the well-known Marxist historian and the political leader, headed the organizational work of archives in the Soviet Union, which resulted in the exclusion of the prerevolutionary specialists from the archival field in the Soviet Union. However, the discussions over the concept of "the Archival Fond" by B. I. Anfilov helped to develop the archival theories in the USSR in the twenties. In conclusion, the Soviet Union, having emphasized the centralization of the archives, developed its archival systems from the early period, which were the basis of the systematic archival institutions in Russia.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제1호
• /
• pp.7-22
• /
• 2000

It is almost impossible to fulfill the users' information needs efficiently without any finding aids. The idiosyncrasy of archival materials had led the archivists to develop their own descriptive rules until the mid of 1980s. It was the arrival of computers and information networks that stimulated the archival community to standardize its variant descriptive practices. The primary purpose of the national and international archival description standards is to facilitate the cooperative archival data exchange. The Ad Hoc Commission on Descriptive Standards of the International Council on Archives adopted ISAD(G) and ISAAR(CPF) in 1993 and in 1995 respectively. ISAD(G) guides the formulation of information in each of 26 elements that may be combined to constitute the description of an archival entity. ISAAR(CPF) is to give general rules for the establishment of archival authority records in descriptions of archival documents. Histories, structures and fundamental principles of those two international archival standards have been studies in this article. Most of the present archival description standards are based on the principle of provenance and the authority model. The instability of modern organizations and the digitalization of record keeping systems have been making the archivists to review these basic archival principles. It is suggested that Korean archival community should attempt to draft a national archival descriptive standard suitable to the Korean archival practice and Korean language in the framework of the international standards.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.99-118
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 기록 전문직의 지식 범주에 관해 외국의 지침서를 먼저 살펴보고 이와 함께 국내 기록 전문직 양성 프로그램과 교과과정을 비교해보았다. 그리고 국외 기록 전문직의 양성 사례를 4개국을 중심으로 짚어본 후, 기록 전문직 양성 프로그램의 개선 방향을 제시하였다. 기록 전문직 양성 프로그램의 개선 방향으로 전문성을 개발해 줄 수 있는 대학원 교육의 강화, 다양한 학문의 참여와 시도를 통한 다학문적 교과목의 개발 및 확대, 기록관리 지식이 균형 있게 짜인 교과과정 편성, 이수 학점의 상향 조정, 기록관리학 전공의 박사학위를 소지한 전임 교원의 충원, 실무와 연구 지식범주의 교과목 강화, 기록관리학 표준교과과정의 개발과 기록 전문직의 전문성 증진을 위한 교육기관, 기록관리 전문 학 협회, 기록 관련 기관 간의 파트너십 형성과 적극적인 활동을 제시하였다.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.223-245
• /
• 2016

ICA의 CBPS에서는 지난 20여년간 ISAD(G)와 ISAAR(CPF)와 같은 기록물 기술표준을 개발해 왔다. 그리고 최근에 ICA는 새로운 조직인 EGAD를 구성하여 기존의 기록물 기술표준을 통합하고 있다. EGAD가 개발 중인 기술표준의 명칭은 'Record in Context'(RIC)이며, 개념모형과 온톨로지로 구성된다. 그런데 EGAD는 RIC의 개발을 위해 ICA의 기존 기록물 기술표준뿐 아니라, 호주나 스페인, 핀란드에서 최근에 개정된 기록물 기술표준과 박물관 및 도서관 분야의 협력을 통해 개발된 FRBRoo도 참고하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국제적인 기록물 기술표준의 개정 동향을 살펴보고, 이와 같은 동향이 국내의 기록물 기술표준의 발전에 주는 시사점을 도출하였다. 기록물의 기술표준은 표준화된 기술요소의 정확한 입력지침을 넘어서, 상위의 개념틀을 제공하고, 이를 바탕으로 유연한 기록물 기술과 데이터 공유가 용이한 온톨로지를 제공하기 위해 개선되고 있었다. 앞으로는 국내의 기록물 기술표준도 정보환경의 변화를 수용하고, 문화유산관리기관 간의 협력을 증진시킬 수 있는 방향으로 발전해야 할 것이다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.41-72
• /
• 2002

Electronic environment affects archival community to a great extent. It redefines virtually every stage of archival management form creation to current and semi-current use, to appraisal, and to preservation of records. Faced with the problems caused by ever increasing electronic records, the community is forced to reconsider traditional concepts, approaches, methodologies, even the basic paradigm embedded in archival theory and practice. The present paper discusses the need to reexamine principles and techniques of archival management in the light of digital environment. It also urges archives and archival institutions, the archival profession, or the archival community at large, to participate in this critical enterprise. Success in this endeavor will, eventually, pave the road toward creating, organizing, providing access to, preserving reliably and authentically electronic records and designing proper system for the societal collective memory in recorded digital information.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.73-120
• /
• 2002

Aural archival description has been rarely discussed, although it is one of the important process in managing and using aural archives. Aural archives not being cataloged are difficult to access; moreover they require tools and a lot of time to search appropriate records. This study concerning characteristics of archival description and aural archives analyzed rules for aural archival description in United Kingdom, Canada and United States of America Comparing and analyzing rules, a rules for aural archival description in Korea was proposed and arranged into eight areas modified from seven areas of ISAD(G). This study focused on developing rules for description covering all aspects of aural archives in Korea. The rules for aural archival description will offer a base of Korean Rules for Archival Description and building aural archival databases.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.115-130
• /
• 2010

In the archival field, the last decade has witnessed much discussion on archives' broad responsibilities for social memory. Considering that the social role of archives has stemmed from postmodern thinking suggests a paradigm shift from viewing archives as static recorded objects to viewing them as dynamic evidence of human memory. The modern archives and archivists are products of nineteenth-century positivism, limiting their function to archiving written documents within stable organizations. The new thoughts on the social role of archives provide a chance to realize that traditional archival practices have preserved only a sliver of organizational memory, thus ignoring fluid records of human activities and memory. Archival description is the primary method for users to access materials in archives. Thus, it can determine how archival materials will be used (or not used). The traditional archival description works as the representation of archival materials and is directly projected from the hierarchy of organizational documents. This paper argues that archivists will need to redefine archival description to be more sensitive to atypical types of archival materials from various cultural contexts. This paper surveys the postmodern approaches to archival concepts in relation to descriptive practices. It also examines some issues related to representing historically marginalized groups in archival description who were previously neglected in traditional archival practices.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제28권
• /
• pp.39-59
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to develop the education programs for the archival librarian in Korea. The importance of archival work requires that archivists should receive an archival education at university. But there is no professional education programs in Korea. The interdisciplinary character of archival studies programs make it possible to place them in a variety of setting, such as a department of library and information science, department of history. Currently, archival education must assume a much more prominent role within the library and information science. Library and information science educators, increasingly concerned with their own survival, seek rational ways to diversify their area. They are looking at mergers with allied fields. Archival education programs will find a welcome home in a number of existing department of library and information science. Archival education programs could be provided according to three categories undergraduate coursework, master of archival studies, and continuing education programs. The body of knowledge that a student should master as part of an archival education program is classified here as basic knowledge of archival studies, specified knowledge of archives and records, practical knowledge of archives and records management, and complementary and contextual knowledge of archival studies.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.81-99
• /
• 2023

'평가(appraisal)'는 기록관리의 핵심 영역이다. 이 연구는 기록학 분야의 대표적인 백과사전인 『Encyclopedia of Archival Science』을 중심으로 기록평가의 지식구조를 파악하고, 관련 대역어들의 적절성을 분석하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위하여 먼저 이 사전에 146개 표제어 중 평가 관련 표제어 34개를 추출하고, 내용분석에 기초하여 용어를 범주화하였다. 둘째, 각 범주별 표제어들을 중심으로 주요 개념과 논의의 흐름을 살펴보았다. 셋째. 각 표제어들에 대한 대역어를 제시하였으며 대역어 선정 시 고려할 점을 제안하였다. 특히 '기록평가'(records appraisal)와 '보존기록평가(archival appraisal)'를 구분하여 사용하고, 등가의 원칙에 따라 대역어를 선정할 것을 제안하였다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제12호
• /
• pp.37-80
• /
• 2005

Archival appraisal has been a significant field and demanding task in thoughts and practice about modern archive, in particular, because of insufficiency of resources for the preservation in comparison with the large scale of recorded information. Appraising records does naturally go with the selecting and acquiring them. In the field of appraisal, however, comprehensive accountability on appraisal is much more important than selection and acquisition. The purpose of this study is the proposition of the theoretic approach to the analysis of the factors concerning the archival appraisal. For this purpose, I would try not the actual practice of the archival appraisal but theoretical categories of archival appraisal decision. The archival Characteristic, Value, and Context will be proposed as theoretical categories for the analysis of archival appraisal decision. Firstly, Characteristic category makes it clear to identify the reliable and authentic records, and then, Value provides us with elucidation about the appraisers' recognition of values. Lastly, Context explains the priority of selection throughout creating, using, interrelationship, and social meaning of archives.