• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 2015

The tasks of writing history is to reconstruct the past in order to understand the present condition and to envision the future. Modern architectural histories in the west have assumed this role, from Winckelmann to Giedion. Likewise, history of Korean modern architecture has to serve this purpose. However, existing histories of Korean modern architecture simply list up stylistic changes from western eclectic architecture to modernism without any historical narratives explaining the transition from Korean traditional architecture to modern architecture. History of Korean modern architecture has simply been understood as a unilateral process of transplantation of western architecture into Korea. This paper points out two major problems underlying this kind of historiography of Korean modern architecture. The one is formalistic approach which sees history of modern architecture mainly as a process of formal and stylistic changes. The other is humanistic approach which sees modern architects as agents of history. This paper argues that this kind of history writings has limitations since modernity of Korean architecture is fundamentally different from that of the west. and that specific tasks that Korean modern architectural history has to address are then two folds;(re)connecting the past architectural tradition to the present and forming self-identity of Korean architecture.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.44-48
• /
• 1992

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.443-452
• /
• 2017

건축의 한 분야인 동시에 역사학의 한 분야이기도 한 건축역사는 건축양식의 변천을 다루기는 하나 사회적, 경제적, 문화적, 기술적 상황 등의 시대 배경을 종합적으로 고찰할 필요가 있다. 그러므로 건축역사에서 주로 사용되는 용어는 다양한 분야를 아우를 수밖에 없다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 건축역사 관련 문헌을 대상으로 텍스트 마이닝과 연관 관계 분석을 수행하여 어떤 용어가 건축역사에서 핵심적인 용어인지를 파악해보았다. 우선 국내 건축역사 분야 유일한 학술지인 "건축역사연구"를 선정하여 지금까지 게재된 논문의 제목과 주제어, 초록에 사용된 용어 중 고빈도로 출현하는 핵심 용어들을 도출하였다. 다음으로 연구 분야별 문헌들을 구분하여 핵심 용어의 특징을 분석하였다. 마지막으로, 연관 관계 분석을 통해 핵심 용어들 간에 유기적인 관계를 분석하고 시각화하였다. 이러한 건축역사 핵심 용어의 파악은 건축역사 분야의 지금까지의 논의 내용과 향후 방향성을 이해하는데 유용할 것이다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.240-254
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this paper is to suggest new direction to the historical research society of Korean architecture by epistemological discussion. Korean architectural history at present, without question of history for what, for whom, and how, is regarded as 'history for the past' only 'to describe past' or 'to collect correct data' However, history is beyond that; history ought to suggest a direction of present and near future. Moreover, architecture is not pure but applied knowledge, that is, focused to 'how to build'. Therefore, past historical knowledge by research should influence to present design. In order to do that, history of mere data collection should change direction to the history of meaning by interpretation, and then, of finding design principle. The principle used in architectural community becomes theory in scientific research community, and finally is unified to 'theory of practice'. Creative history should be substituted for retrospective history reusing historical reservoir, at the specific situation of Korea; tradition has been discontinued drastically and Western method imported to the point of being culturally-colonized. Some expmples of altanative history are suggested at the end of this paper as conclusion.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.23-36
• /
• 2014

Source criticism is very important on the research of architectural history as well as general history. In this point this research studied on the original form and change of Dokrak-dang that is very important building in architectural history of Korea. The result is as in the following. Dokrak-dang that Whoijae built at first was three by two kans size that had daecheong of four kans and ondol-bang of two kans. Gye-jeong that Whoijae built was three kans size that had daecheong of two kans and ondol-bang of one kan. After Whoijae died, Dokrak-dang's ondol-bang was changed to maru between 1555 and 1556 and ondol-bang in west side and stack room was added in 1630. Gye-jeong was changed to ㄱ-shaped floor plan that was added up two kans from three kan's 'ㅡ'-shaped one.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.173-179
• /
• 2006

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.147-172
• /
• 2006

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.180-188
• /
• 2006

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.69-82
• /
• 1996

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2006