• Title/Summary/Keyword: Anti-Suit Injunction

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Close Relations between Arbitration and State Court in each Procedural Stage -With an Emphasis on International Arbitration Agreement- (중재와 법원 사이의 역할분담과 절차협력 관계 -국제적 중재합의 효력에 관한 다툼과 중재합의관철 방안을 중심으로-)

  • Kim, Yong-Jin
    • Journal of Arbitration Studies
    • /
    • v.27 no.1
    • /
    • pp.85-106
    • /
    • 2017
  • This article deals with the relationship between arbitration and state court in each procedural stage. As most legal systems over the world respect arbitration agreement, the relationship between arbitration and state courts puts emphasis on party autonomy and provides the independent power of arbitration agreement tribunal (Kompetenz-Kompetenz). Most institutional arbitration rules the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction. Modern national laws have similar provisions based on Art. 16 UNCITRAL Model Law. In this regards the author throws a question in Chapter II, whether the doctrine of Kompetenz-Kompetenz, namely the ability of the tribunal to decide upon its own jurisdiction is worth while persisting, and whether the Kompetenz-Kompetenz-agreement should be regarded as valid, with the conclusion, that this doctrine should concede to the power of state court and that Kompetenz-Kompetenz-Klausel is invalid. In Chapter III the author discusses the issue of whether the breach of an arbitration agreement could lead to the compensation of damage. Although the author stands for the procedural character of arbitration agreement, he offers a proposal that the breach of an arbitration agreement bring about the compensation of damage. The issue of anti-suit injunction is discussed also in this Chapter. He is against the approval of anti-suit injunction based on an arbitration agreement resisting the other party from pursuing a lawsuit in a foreign country.