• 제목/요약/키워드: Answer Me 1994

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.016초

Retro(복고) 콘텐츠 트렌드(Trend)를 통해 살펴본 사용자의 감성적 경험연구: <응답하라 1994>를 중심으로 (User's Emotional Experience Through the Retro Content Trend: A Case Study on the Answer me 1994)

  • 신동희;김태양
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.123-134
    • /
    • 2014
  • 최근 문화콘텐츠의 최고 화두는 복고이다. 하루가 다르게 발전하고 있는 스마트미디어 환경은 콘텐츠 시장에 다양성과 창의성이라는 혜택과 과제를 동시에 던져주고 있다. 최근 레트로 문화는 '응답하라' 시리즈물을 통하여 폭발적으로 확장되었으며 '응답하라'시리즈물의 성공은 사용자의 감성적 경험을 불러일으킬 수 있는 콘텐츠의 중요성을 보여주고 있다. 이러한 관점에서 본 연구는 <응답하라 1994>신드롬을 통하여 사용자의 감성적 경험을 이해하고 레트로 콘텐츠가 단순한 과거회상의 역할을 넘어 어떻게 현재에 재서사화 되어 사용자의 감성적 경험을 이끌어 내는지 고찰한다. <응답하라 1994>를 통한 시청자들의 감성적 경험에 대한 요인분석 결과 도출된 5가지 감성적 경험 요인들은 시청자와 레트로 콘텐츠 관계에 정적인 영향을 미친 것으로 분석되었으며 시청자 만족, 레트로 콘텐츠에 대한 신뢰, 레트로 콘텐츠 애착에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 시청자 만족에 영향을 미치는 요인별 영향력은 음악적 감성경험, 아이템 감성경험, 감각적 경험, 스토리적 감성경험의 순으로 나타났고, 레트로 콘텐츠에 대한 신뢰에 영향을 미치는 감성적 경험의 요인별 영향력은 음악적 감성경험, 감각적 경험, 스토리적 감성경험, 그리고 아이템 감성경험의 순으로 나타났으나 등장배우로 인한 감성적 경험은 유의미한 영향력을 갖지 못했다. 레트로 콘텐츠 애착에 미치는 감성적 경험의 차원별 영향력은 음악적 감성경험, 아이템 감성경험, 등장배우로 인한 감성경험, 감각적 경험, 스토리적 감성경험의 순으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 레트로가 가지고 있는 본질적인 의미를 파악하고 소비자의 감성적 경험에 기반을 둔 문화 콘텐츠의 생산 및 확산이 미디어 콘텐츠 생태계 형성 및 발전에 매우 중요한 요소임을 시사한다.

Social Support의 한국적 의미 (Search for the Meaning of Social Support in Korean Society)

  • 오가실;서미혜;이선옥;김정아;오경옥;정추자;김희순
    • 대한간호학회지
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.264-277
    • /
    • 1994
  • In Korea the concept of social support was first used as a research concept in nursing and has not had much application in the clinical field. Another problem is that research on social support has used a direct translation of the words “social support” into Korean as “sawhejuk jiji”. Three questions were posed to direct the re-search. 1) Is there a concept of social support in Korean society? 2) if so, what words or expressions are used to de-scribe it? 3) further, if so, how is social support structured and how does it function? In order to answer the research questions a three-step research methodology was used : The first step consisted of a literature review on re-search related to social support and on information on the background of, and the way of thinking re-lated to interpersonal relations among Korean people. The second step, which was done to identify whether there is a concept of social support in korean society, involved interviewing a sample of the population. The third step involved a panel discussion that included the members of the research team and three consultants, a sociologist, a philosopher and a scholor in korean literature. A review of the literature on interpersonal relationships in traditional korean society identified a four cirole structure that explains interpersonal relationships. The first circle with “me” at the center is the family but here “me” disappears into the “we” that is essential for a cooperative agricultural society. In the second circle are those close to “me” but outside the family. The third circle includes those with whom “I ” have infrequent but regular contact and with whom correct conduct is important. The last circle is all the people with whom “I” have nothing in common. They are excluded in interpersonal relationships. The literature on interpersonal relationships showed that within the traditional Korean society people lived in villages where most people were very familiar with each other. “Yun”, the social network established the connection and “Jung”, the feeling of affection increased with time as the connection was strengthened. In the traditional village psychological support was provided through “Mallaniki”, “Pumashi” and “Kae” with the latter two also providing material support. In modern Korea there are more informal and formal social networks, like social services and community activities on the formal level and cultural and leisure groups along with “kae’s on the informal level. But even with this modern variety of groups, most social support comes from informal networks that resemble the traditiorlal “Pumashi”, “Kai” md “Mallaniki”. The six member research team interviewed 65 people in order to identify whether there is a concept of social support and then analysed their responses. There were 20 different words describing the reception of the social support and these could be grouped into seven major categories : virtuous, fortunate, helped, supported, blessed, attached(receiving affection) and receiving (grace) benevolence. there were 27 words describing the act of social support which could be categorized into seven major categories : love, looking after, affection(attachment), kindness(goodness), faith, psychological help and material help. for the meaning of social support translated as “sawhe juk jiji” there were a total of 14 different answers which could be categorized into 3 major categories : help, agreement, and faith. In third step, the results of the literature review and the answers to the questions were discussed in a pannel. The results of the discussion led to the following definition of social support in Korea which is shaped like a the four sided pyramid on a base. Social support is the apex of the pyramid and four sides are made up of : “do-oom” (both emotional and material help), “jung” (connectedness, or relationship bound by affection, regard or shared common experience ), “midum” (faith or belief in), “eunhae” (kindness or benevolence). The research team identified “Yun”( the basic network of relationships) as the base of the pyramid and as such the foundation for the components of social support in Korean culture. On “Yun” rest the other four components of social support : “Jung”, “Midum”, “Do-oom”, and “Eunhae”, For social support to take place there must be “Yun”. This is an important factor in social support. In private social network “Jung” is an essential factor in social support. But not in the public social network. “Yun” is a condition for “Jung” and “Jung” is the manifestation of support.

  • PDF