• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2007년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1819-1826
• /
• 2007

This study results of performed field load test in order to estimate the best pile length assessment and allowable bearing capacity of the pile foundation. End of initial driving(EOID) and restrike of pile dynamic loading tests were performed to calculate allowable bearing capacity of the experimental pile side and results were compared with the allowable bearing capacity estimated by theory. The results of allowable bearing capacity by EOID test is $1.08{\sim}1.21$ in the range of compared to the capacity calculated by the Structure Foundation Design Criterion. Allowable bearing Capacity by restrike of pile dynamic loading test is $1.32{\sim}1.48$ in the range of compared to the Structure Foundation Design Criterion. The Foundation Design Criterion underestimated the pile capacity. If the bearing capacity calculated by Structure Foundation Design Criterion is 100, EOID of pile dynamic loading test is 116, restrike of pile dynamic loading test is 138 for 20m pile used in this experimental.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 2002년도 추계학술대회 논문집 전력기술부문
• /
• pp.277-279
• /
• 2002

Recently, power requirement has been increasing. But the large generation unit is hardly installed because of economic and environment problem. Therefore, the concern for DG(distributed generation) is growing. Present, allowable interconnection capacity of DG for composite distributed generation is studied. In this paper, it is studied that the new interconnection capacity of DG for composite distribution system interconnected DG. We study new allowable interconnection capacity by power factor and placement. We study SERV(sending end reference voltage) variation and allowable interconnection capacity interconnected new DG.

• 한국지반공학회논문집
• /
• 제37권11호
• /
• pp.7-22
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 현장타설말뚝에서 실시된 양방향말뚝재하시험 자료에 대하여 역해석을 실시하였다. 그리고 실트질 점토, 실트질 모래, 모래질 실트, 모래질 자갈, 풍화암, 연암의 다양한 선단지반에 지지된 대구경 현장타설 말뚝에 대하여 수치해석을 실시하여 지지력을 분석하였다. 지지력 분석은 P-S 방법, Davisson 방법, 25.4mm 허용침하량을 이용하여 산정하였다. 3가지 방법으로 분석한 최소 허용지지력은 19.64MN ~ 24.96MN으로 나타났다. 이때, 선단지지력은 두부재하하중의 2% ~ 12%를 분담하였으며, 주면마찰력은 두부재하하중의 88% ~ 98%를 분담하였다. 선단 지반의 강도가 클수록 허용지지력이 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 최대 허용지지력과 최소 허용지지력의 차이는 5.32MN로 선단 지반종류에 따른 허용지지력의 증가는 27%에 불과하였다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2001년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.281-292
• /
• 2001

The evaluation of the allowable bearing capacity is the most important step in the design of a foundation. An accurate evaluation of the effect of all factors such as the physical properties of the soil located beneath the area, the size of the area, the depth of foundation, and the position of the water table is impracticable Therefore, the designer is compelled to estimate the allowable bearing capacity on the basis of simple semiempirical rules under cohesionless soils. This paper deals with semiemperical rules for determining allowable bearing capacity based on observed relations between the results of standard penetration test. Additional comparisions between the results of the theoretical methods and the emperical rules are performed to suggest more conservative design for the engineer.

• 복합신소재구조학회 논문집
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.19-27
• /
• 2012

Structural insulated panels, which are structurally performed panels consisting of a plastic insulation bonded between two structural panel facings are one of emerging products with a viewpoint of its energy and construction efficiencies. These components are applicable to fabricated wood structures. By now, there are few technical documents regulated structural performance and engineering criteria in domestic market. This study was conducted to suggest fundamental reports such as racking resistance, axial capacity, transverse load capacity, and lintel load capacity for SIPs. Test results showed that maximum load was 44.3kN, allowable load was 14.7kN for racking resistance, and that maximum load was 137.6kN, allowable load was 37.4kN/m for axial compression capacity. For transverse load capacity, test results showed $10.3kN/m^2$ of maximum load, $3.4kN/m^2$ of allowable load. For lintel load capacity for SIPs dependent to lengths, allowable loads were 20.4kN for 600mm long lintel, 23.9kN for 1,200mm long lintel, 19.3kN for 1,800mm long lintel, and 2,400mm long lintel had 14.1kN of allowable load. In the near future, when the allowable load for wall application is established, SIPs is considered to substitute the existent post-and-lintel construction to bearing wall structure.

• 지질공학
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.59-69
• /
• 2020

CPR 시험말뚝에 대해 인발재하시험을 실시하고, 하중-변위 곡선과 하중-침하량 곡선을 분석한 후 항복하중과 허용지지력을 산정하여 주면마찰력을 평가하였다. 하중-변위 곡선으로부터 분석된 CPR 시험말뚝의 결과에 의하면, CPR 시험말뚝의 직경이 큰 경우의 항복하중과 허용지지력이 작은 경우보다 약 1.4배 이상 크게 나타났다. 하중-침하량 곡선으로 부터 분석된 결과에 의하면, CPR 시험말뚝의 직경 D500의 허용지지력이 D400보다 약 1.2~2.1배 큰 것으로 나타났다. 하지만, Fuller 분석에 의해 산정된 허용지지력은 P-S 곡선과 log P - log S 곡선에 의해 산정된 허용지지력과 큰 차이를 보여, Fuller 분석에 의한 허용지지력 산정은 적절하지 않은 것으로 판단되었다.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.124-133
• /
• 1997

Pile load test is good for estimating pile bearing capacity, but using this method is limited by time and cost required. Dynamic and static method is more convenient and economical, but confidence of estimated value by dynamic and static method are lower than that of pile load test. After being compared pile bearing capacity data obtained from pile load test with those of other two methods, the results from this study were summarised as follows. For allowable bearing capacity values greater than 175t per pile, bearing capacity acquired from static method was higher than that acquired from pile load test, whereas bearing capacity acquired from pile load test was higher than that acquired from static method for values under 175 per pile. It was that variance of bearing capacity was large when bearing capacity obtained by dynamic method was higher than 250t. Also bearing capacity based on dynamic method was higher than that based on pile load test. Allowable bearing capacity get from dynamic method suggested that carefull precautions are necessary in application for allowable bearing capacity values higher than 2S0ton per pile.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2006년도 춘계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.466-475
• /
• 2006

Reliability analysis between safety factor and reliability index for driven and bored pile load capacity was analyzed in this study. 0.1B, Chin, De Beer, and Davisson's methods were used for determining pile load capacity by using load-settlement curve from pile load test. Each method define ultimate, yield and allowable pile load capacities. LCPC method using CPT results was performed for comparing with results of pile load test. Based on FOSM analysis using load factors, it is obtained that reliability indices for ultimate pile load capacity were higher than those of yield and allowable condition. Present safety factor 2 for yield and allowable load capacities are not enough to satisfy target reliability index $2.0\sim2.5$. However, it is sufficient for ultimate pile load capacity using safety factor 3.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.99-105
• /
• 2001

This paper presents results km a series of model tests oil vertically loaded single piles to compare the behaviors of H and pipe piles under the same ground condition. The aims of this paper were to compare the bearing capacity of H-pile md pipe piles under in the same ground condition and to estimate the effect of gravity acceleration and relative soil density. Relative density of soil were made to be 40%, 80% and embedded length of pile on sand was increased by 10, 12, 14, 16 times of the diameter of pile, respectively. As a results of test series, allowable load of H-pile is from 6.4% to 18.2% larger than allowable load of pipe pile in relative density 80% and from 9.1% to 39.4% larger than allowable load of pipe pile in relative density 40%. As a results of numerical analysis, we were predicted behaviour of stress-displacement of pile with model test. In the case of relative density 80% and 40%, bearing capacity of H pile represent from 17.74% to 18.6% larger than allowable load of pipe pile.

• 한국지반공학회지:지반
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.61-70
• /
• 1997

매입말뚝공법으로 시공된 말뚝의 거동은 항타말뚝의 그것과는 다르고 또한 여기서 얻어지는 하중-침하량 곡선의 특성도 다름에도 불구하고 이에 대한 기본적인 고찰없이 항타공법에서 적용해 왔던 허용하중 결정방법을 그대로 매입말뚝공법에도 준용하고 있다. 국내의 관련기준에 의하면 허용지지력을 결정하는 방법들이 기준마다 서로 다르고 또한 적용 안전율도 차이가 있어 서로 상충되는 면이 있다. 본 논문에서는 106개 말뚝의 정재하시험을 통해 얻어진 하중-침하량 곡선을 분석하고 이들 결과를 공법별로 비교하였다. 분석결과 일정한 곡선을 기준하여 제시된 각종의 수학적 기법들은 허용지지력을 결정하기 위한 적절한 방법이 아님을 알 수 있었다. 또한 분석결과를 바탕으로 적절한 허용하중 판정방법 및 적용안전율을 제안하였다.