• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.171-180
• /
• 2000

This study aims to present a more reasonable control value than the exiting one by comparing and analyzing control values and field instrumentation values of the whole excavation depth of the four case sites using geometric averaging as a statistical method. The range of the study is confined to three things: (1) the axial force of the braced excavation walls among a variety of items prescribed in the control values by stress deformation of walls and adjacent structures; (2) by approximation of the allowable and design value; (3) and by safety factor. As a res it is desirable to revise "(Long term allowable stress + Short term allowable stress)/2 ~ Short term allowable stress," presented in the present control values by stress deformation of walls and adjacent structures, to "(Long term allowable stress + Short term allowable stress)/5 ~ (Short term allowable stress)/3." The result also shows that since there is a difference of about 3.5%, it is not necessary to revise 70, 90, and 100 percent of LEVEL I, II, and III, prescribed in the control values by the allowable and design value approximation. In addition, modifying the control value by the safety factor, now 1.07, is unnecessary, although it varies little difference from the present value.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.169-176
• /
• 2001

This study aims to present a more reasonable control value than the exiting one by comparing and analyzing control values and field instrument8tion values of the whole excavation depth of the four case sites, using geometric averaging as a statistical method. The range of the study is confined to the horizontal displacement of braced excavation walls among a variety of items, prescribed in the control values by approximately of the allowable and design values, and by safety factors. As a result, it is desirable to revise 70, 90, and 100 percent of LEVEL I, II, and III, respectively. The horizontal displacement values of the allowable and design values approximations should change to 104, 133, and 148 percent of the allowable and design values, respectively. In addition, modifying the horizontal displacement control value of the braced excavation walls is not needed. The horizontal displacement value, presented in the control value as a safety factor, is now 1.19, as it has a slight difference from the present value.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2001년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.281-292
• /
• 2001

The evaluation of the allowable bearing capacity is the most important step in the design of a foundation. An accurate evaluation of the effect of all factors such as the physical properties of the soil located beneath the area, the size of the area, the depth of foundation, and the position of the water table is impracticable Therefore, the designer is compelled to estimate the allowable bearing capacity on the basis of simple semiempirical rules under cohesionless soils. This paper deals with semiemperical rules for determining allowable bearing capacity based on observed relations between the results of standard penetration test. Additional comparisions between the results of the theoretical methods and the emperical rules are performed to suggest more conservative design for the engineer.

• 한국추진공학회지
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.80-85
• /
• 2013

본 논문은 평균값과 Allowable 값 기준의 구조 안전율과 구조 신뢰도와 관계 비교를 통해 복합재 추진기관의 확률적 구조 설계 방법을 설명하였다. 일반적으로 복합재 압력용기의 평균 값 기준의 구조설계는 1.5 이상의 구조 안전율과 0.999 이상의 구조 신뢰도 값이 요구된다. 요구 압력 기준의 0.999의 구조 신뢰도를 만족하기 위해서 평균 값 기준의 구조설계는 섬유 강도의 변동률에 따라 다른 구조 안전율을 부여해야한다. 그러나 이미 섬유 강도 변동률이 고려된 Allowable 값을 이용할 때는 고정된 안전율이 부여된다. 이상의 해석 결과로 볼 때 섬유 강도는 복합재 압력용기 구조 설계에 가장 중요한 설계 변수이고, 우수한 성능의 복합재 추진기관을 개발하기 위해서는 섬유 강도의 변동률이 최소화되어야 함을 알 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.25-35
• /
• 2015

본 연구에서는 국산 침엽수재의 육안 등급구분과 허용응력설정에 관한 국내의 학술논문을 정리하였다. 국립산림과학원 고시(KFRI 1995-27, KFRI 2000-39, KFRI 2007-3, KFRI 2009-1)를 활용하여 국산 낙엽송재의 육안 등급 구분한 연구를 비교한 결과 등급구분 비율이 연구자마다 상이했다. 보다 신뢰할 수 있는 등급구분 분류를 위해서 공증된 목재이용 기관에서 숙련된 연구자에 의한 등급구분을 시행하여야 할 것으로 사료된다. 허용응력설정에 관한 연구를 고찰한 결과, 연구자 마다 허용응력산출 방법이 ASTM D 245, KS F 2152, JAS 1990으로 모두 상이했다. 이는 침엽수 구조용재(KS F 3020)에서 기준허용응력을 제시하고 있지만 허용응력을 산출하는 명확한 방법이 제시되어 있지 않기 때문인 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 공식적인 허용응력 결정방법이 제정되어야 할 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.432-439
• /
• 2013

The aim of this study was to investigate the processes for evaluating the allowable bending stress. The confidence levels and the size-adjustment in standards were reviewed with experimental data. The results show that, (1) KS F 2152 was more strict than others overseas standards due to the higher confidence level. The 5% NTL of bending strengths by a method in KS F 2152 were lower than the overseas standards and more specimens were required for evaluating the structural properties according to KS F 2152. (2) Due to the absence of size-adjustment method in domestic standards, the specified size and the exponential parameters on the size-adjustment equation were reviewed by size factors. The specified size (width: 286 mm, length: 6096 mm), and the exponential parameters (w: 0.29, l: 0.14) will be suitable for developing the allowable bending stress in domestic standard. (3) The size adjusted allowable bending stresses of No. 2 grade Korean pine were lower than the allowable stresses tabulated in KBC even though less strict method (75% confidence level) to calculate 5% value was used. The allowable stresses tabulated in KBC are needed to be reviewed by continuous experimental data.

• Journal of Biosystems Engineering
• /
• 제32권6호
• /
• pp.416-421
• /
• 2007

Physical damage to fruits and vegetables caused by shock degrades the value of product in the fresh market. In order to design a product/packaging system to protect the product, the G-factor to the product that causes shock damage needs to be determined. The shock fragility of organisms such as fruits with a concept correspondent to the G-factor of industrial products was calculated and we defined the allowable bio-shock fragility index as the value divided peak acceleration that was generated in safe drop height by standard acceleration of gravity. We did modeling for safe drop hight that would prevent fruits from damage by drop tests and tried to estimate the allowable bio-shock fragility index of pears and apples for optimum packaging design. The bio-shock fragility index of pears was in the range of $0.74{\sim}2.29\;G$, while apples had a slightly higher value than that of pears, of $0.51{\sim}2.98\;G$. This result shows accordance with the general fact that apples have a firmer structure and get less damage from the same impact. Based on this result, it is possible to create an optimum packaging design by providing a damage standard by impact.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2001년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.985-990
• /
• 2001

The widened Seoul-Bridge is the first continuous 8-span prestressed concrete(PSC) girder bridge in domain. The construction sequence of the bridge consists of S steps in a large way. The measuring in construction stage includes the determination of the allowable fluctuation value of beam stress in each step and the measurement beam stress during prestessing. The measured tendon prestress force was compared with the design value. When it was compared with the analytic result, the difference between the measured stress and the analytic stress was below allowable error. The friction loss and the anchorage slip loss of the tendon prestress force was lower than the design loss value.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 2015

Although attention to terrorism has increased sharply in recent years within many countries, it is by no means a new phenomenon. Majority of these countries have limited regulations or guidelines about terrorism. LOP (Level Of Protection) can be consider as a first step. This paper seeks to present a process to determine LOP and allowable damage. LOP is determined by asset value reason why it should be based on cost. The asset value is defined as "cost induced when asset is damaged". For example, the collateral damage outside the facility should be taken in consideration in the asset value. Allowable structural damage is assigned depending on LOP.

• 화약ㆍ발파
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.36-43
• /
• 1997