• Title/Summary/Keyword: Agricultural hydraulic concrete structures

Search Result 22, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

A study on proposal of design aqueduct be considered for rural landscape on Agricultural Hydraulic Structures (농촌경관을 고려한 수로교 디자인 방안 연구)

  • Kim, Meyong-Won;Kim, Kwan-Ho;Cho, Young-Kweon
    • Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
    • /
    • 2008.04a
    • /
    • pp.1013-1016
    • /
    • 2008
  • The demands of urban people for rural natural environments will increase but poor and low level of infrastructure facilities delay the development of green tourism villages as an attractive green tour destination. The objective of this paper are to offered a rural landscape improvement simulation of a aqueduct and designing that to meet the needs of the community.

  • PDF

Experimental Study of Flip-Bucket Type Hydraulic Energy Dissipator on Steep slope Channel (긴구배수로 감세공의 Filp Bucket형 이용연구)

  • 김영배
    • Magazine of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.2206-2217
    • /
    • 1971
  • Spillway and discharge channel of reservoirs require the Control of Large volume of water under high pressure. The energies at the downstream end of spillway or discharge channel are tremendous. Therefore, Some means of expending the energy of the high-velocity flow is required to prevent scour of the riverbed, minimize erosion, and prevent undermining structures or dam it self. This may be accomplished by Constructing an energy dissipator at the downstream end of spillway or discharge channel disigned to dissipated the excessive energy and establish safe flow Condition in the outlet channel. There are many types of energy dissipators, stilling basins are the most familar energy dissipator. In the stilling basin, most energies are dissipated by hydraulic jump. stilling basins have some length to cover hydraulic jump length. So stilling basins require much concrete works and high construction cost. Flip bucket type energy dissipators require less construction cost. If the streambed is composed of firm rock and it is certain that the scour will not progress upstream to the extent that the safety of the structure might be endangered, flip backet type energy dissipators are the most recommendable one. Following items are tested and studied with bucket radius, $R=7h_2$,(medium of $4h_2{\geqq}R{\geqq}10h_2$). 1. Allowable upstream channel slop of bucket. 2. Adequate bucket lip angle for good performance of flip bucket. Also followings are reviwed. 1. Scour by jet flow. 2. Negative pressure distribution and air movement below nappe flow. From the test and study, following results were obtained. 1. Upstream channel slope of bucket (S=H/L) should be 0.25<H/L<0.75 for good performance of flip bucket. 2. Adequated lip angle $30^{\circ}{\sim}40^{\circ}$ are more reliable than $20^{\circ}{\sim}30^{\circ}$ for the safety of structures.

  • PDF