• Title/Summary/Keyword: Agility multi-leaf collimator

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Monte Carlo Algorithm-Based Dosimetric Comparison between Commissioning Beam Data across Two Elekta Linear Accelerators with AgilityTM MLC System

  • Geum Bong Yu;Chang Heon Choi;Jung-in Kim;Jin Dong Cho;Euntaek Yoon;Hyung Jin Choun;Jihye Choi;Soyeon Kim;Yongsik Kim;Do Hoon Oh;Hwajung Lee;Lee Yoo;Minsoo Chun
    • Progress in Medical Physics
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.150-157
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: Elekta synergy® was commissioned in the Seoul National University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital. Recently, Chung-Ang University Gwang Myeong Hospital commissioned Elekta Versa HDTM. The beam characteristics of both machines are similar because of the same AgilityTM MLC Model. We compared measured beam data calculated using the Elekta treatment planning system, Monaco®, for each institute. Methods: Beam of the commissioning Elekta linear accelerator were measured in two independent institutes. After installing the beam model based on the measured beam data into the Monaco®, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation data were generated, mimicking the beam data in a virtual water phantom. Measured beam data were compared with the calculated data, and their similarity was quantitatively evaluated by the gamma analysis. Results: We compared the percent depth dose (PDD) and off-axis profiles of 6 MV photon and 6 MeV electron beams with MC calculation. With a 3%/3 mm gamma criterion, the photon PDD and profiles showed 100% gamma passing rates except for one inplane profile at 10 cm depth from VMTH. Gamma analysis of the measured photon beam off-axis profiles between the two institutes showed 100% agreement. The electron beams also indicated 100% agreement in PDD distributions. However, the gamma passing rates of the off-axis profiles were 91%-100% with a 3%/3 mm gamma criterion. Conclusions: The beam and their comparison with MC calculation for each institute showed good performance. Although the measuring tools were orthogonal, no significant difference was found.