• Title/Summary/Keyword: Adversity and benefit

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.013 seconds

Reconsidering the Semantic Properties of the Get-Passive Construction

  • Eunsuk Lee
    • International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.12 no.3
    • /
    • pp.47-51
    • /
    • 2024
  • We aim to re-examine the semantic properties of the get-passive construction in English, distinguishing it from the more commonly discussed be-passive. Through a detailed analysis of a variety of examples and linguistic contexts, we explore how the get-passive uniquely conveys dynamic, agentive meanings that often implicate the subject in the event's outcome. This construction is particularly prevalent in informal and colloquial speech, where it is frequently employed to depict both adversity and beneficial situations. Our study also reveals that the get-passive has been gaining traction in contemporary English, reflecting broader linguistic trends that favor more expressive and nuanced forms of communication. We argue that understanding these semantic nuances is essential for English learners, as it allows them to navigate the subtle differences between passive constructions more effectively. By mastering the use of the get-passive, learners can enhance their communicative competence, particularly in contexts where speaker stance and subject involvement are key.

Cost.Benefit Risk Based Purchase Pricing Process Model for Feed in Tariffs of Photovoltaic Power Projects (비용.수익 리스크 기반 태양광사업 발전차액지원 기준가격 산정 프로세스 모델)

  • Kim, Se-Jong;Koo, Kyo-Jin
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.113-121
    • /
    • 2010
  • Since the cut-down of the purchasing price of the feed in tariff(FIT) in 2008, the numbers of photovoltaic projects get decreased, contrary to investment expansion policy of government on renewable energy. The root cause of the decrease is the irrationality of the current purchasing price structure of FIT as well as the adversity of fund raising due to the global financial crisis. This study proposes the FIT calculating model (Cost & Benefit Risk Based Purchase Price Process : CBRP3) reflecting the fluctuation of cost and benefit risks. The first step is to establish the photovoltaic generation alternatives, and to calculate each distribution data of the investment and the power generation quantity. The FIT for each alternative is, then, assessed through simulations. Finally the proposed FIT scheme is compared to the present FIT scheme and future study subjects are derived.