• Koreanishche Zeitschrift fur Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft
• /
• v.1
• /
• pp.91-118
• /
• 1999

Die vorliegende Arbeit behandelt ein zweidimensionales Valenzmodell. In diesem Modell wurde der Versuch unternommen, durch Beruck­sichtigung $valenzunabh\"{a}ngiger$ Faktoren die bisherige eindimensionale Valenzkonzeption zu $\"{u}berwinden\;und\;f\"{u}r\;Problemf\"{a}lle$ der Valenz­forschung angemessenere $Erkl\"{a}rungen$ zu bieten. Dabei wurde mit Agel (1994) davon ausgegangen, $da\ss$ man zwischen Valenzpotenz und Valenzrealisierung unterscheiden sollte. Zwischen den beiden Ebenen besteht keine Isomorphie. Auf der Ebene der Valenz­potenz spreche ich von valenzgebundenen und valenzfreien Gliedern, auf der Ebene der Valenzrealisierung dagegen von notwendigen und optional en Gliedern. Somit ergeben sich insgesamt vier $M\"{o}glichkeiten:$ 1. valenzgebunden und notwendig; 2. valenzgebunden und optional; 3. valenzfrei und notwendig; 4. valenzfrei und optional. Viele $Problemf\"{a}lle$ der bisherigen Valenzforschung $geh\"{o}ren$ zu dem zweiten und dem dritten Typ. Erst die Annahme des zweidimensionalen Valenzmodells bietet $daf\"{u}r\;systematische\;Erkl\"{a}rungen$. Anhand verschiedener Beispiele wurde gezeigt, $da\ss$ syntaktische, semantische, pragmatische und konzeptuelle Faktoren die Valenzrealisierung beeinflussen. Valenzrealisierung ist somit nicht als $blo{\ss}e$ Wiedergabe der im Lexikon immanenten Valenzpotenz anzusehen. $Schlie{\ss}lich$ wurde am Beispiel yon gehen das $Verh\"{a}ltnis$ zwischen Valenzpotenz, konzeptuellen Prozessen und Valenzrealisierung dargestellt: Die Realisierung der eigentlich valenzgebundenen lokalen Adverbial­bestimmung $h\"{a}ngt$ eng mit den konzeptuellen Prozessen ($Lokalisierungs-proze{\ss}\;vs.\;Delokalisierungsproze{\ss}$) zusammen. Falls $Lokalisierungs-proze{\ss}$ stattfindet, ist die Realisietung der lokalen Adverbialbestimmung notwendig, um die Direktionalisierung des Verweisobjekts im Hinblick auf das Bezugsobjekt zu bezeichnen. Bei $Delokalisierungsproze\ss$ ist die Realisierung der lokalen Adverbialbestimung dagegen optional.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Language and Information Conference
• /
• 2001.06a
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2001

이 논문은 영어와 한국어에서 나타나는 완수동사(Accomplishment Verb)와 지속부사구(durative adverbial)의 상호작용에 대해서 논한다. Smith(1991)에 의하면 완수동사가 지속부사구와 결합하면, 동사와 부사구의 의미적 자질의 충돌을 피하기 위해서 완수동사의 상변환(Apsect Shift)이 일어난다. 본 논문은 이 상변환이 영어와 한국어에서 어떻게 실현되는가를 보이고, 이를 형식의미론에서 어떻게 기술할 수 있는가를 논한다. 완수동사가 지속부사구와 결합할 때, 영어와 한국어 모두에서 닫힌 완료 관점(closed perfective viewpoint)에서 열린 관점(open viewpoint)으로 관점 변환(viewpoint shift)이 일어난다. 그러나, 한국어의 상변환과 영어의 상변환이 완전히 일치하는 것은 아니다. 한국어의 관점변환은 완료관점도 아니고 미완료 관점도 아닌, 중립관점(neutral viewpoint)으로의 변환인 반면, 영어의 관점변환은 단순히 미완료 관점으로의 변환임이 논의된다. 이 주장은 한국어의 관점변환 구문은 이질적인 다수 사건의 연속 해석(heterogeneous sequential reading of multiple events)을 허용하는 반면, 영어의 관점변환구문은 오직 동질적인 단일 사건의 동시 해석 (homogeneous simultaneous reading of a single event)만을 허용한다는 사실에 의해서 지지 된다. 본 논문은 완수동사가 지속부사구와 결합할 때 일어나는 상변환에 대한 형식의 미론 분석을 Heim ＆ Kratzer (1998)의 틀에서 제시한다. 닫힌 관점에서 열린 관점으로의 상변환은 비가시적 시제 서법 운용자(covert temporal-modal operator)인 IMP를 지속부사구의 논항으로 설정하여 설명한다. IMP는 Dowty (1979)에서 미완료상의 모순(imperfective paradox)을 해결하기 위해서 설정한 PROG를 Heim ＆ Kratzer (1998)의 틀에 맞게 수정한 것이다. IMP는 평가 세계 (evaluation world)를 현실 세계(actual world)에서 가상 관성 세계(possible inertia would)로 변화시켜서, 완수동사의 종결점(ending point)을 현실세계에서 가상의 미래 세계로 움직이는 역할을 한다. 결과적으로, IMP는 완수동사의 닫힌 완료 관점을 현실세계에서는 열린 미완료 관점으로 변환시키되, 가상 관성 세계에서는 그대로 닫힌 관점으로 유지 시키는 효과를 가진다. 한국어와 영어의 관점 변환 구문의 차이는 각 언어의 지속부사구의 어휘 목록의 전제(presupposition)의 차이로 설명된다. 본 논문은 영어의 지속부사구는 논항의 하위간격

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.143-161
• /
• 2010

The "Dong-uibogam(東醫寶鑑)" is a Korean medical book which represents the Korean Oriental Medicine and compiled by the royal physician, Heo Jun. It was placed on UNESCO's Memory of the World Programme in the year of 2009. It has been translated and published in Korean 7 times so far, and most of them depended on the liberal translation. This study has a purpose to investigate the Korean version in the view of Chinese writing grammar, and the results can be concluded as follows ; 1. The Korean version shows insufficient translation of individual morpheme in the sentence which has the prepositions with the pronouns or the conjunctions. 2. Most of the versions failed to translate the syntax properties of the demonstrative pronoun; '之' and '其'. 3. Some of the versions are not successful in the understanding of the constituent of sentence correctly. 4. Many of the adverbial phrases are not translated, which is the constituent of modifier in the sentence. 5. Some sentences are mistranslated by the paragraphs. 6. Some of them failed to understand the significances of the vocabularies.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.134-139
• /
• 2021

This paper discusses the types and functions of English subordinate clauses, whether English subordinate clauses (SC) are headed by a Complementizer (CP) or headed by a lexical (but not functional) Preposition (PP). Furthermore, unlike the standard classification, the current paper provides a finer-grained analysis and classification of English SCs. The traditional or prescriptive view on the functions of English SCs includes Noun SC such as complement clauses, Adjectival SC including relative clauses, and Adverbial SCs that cover a garden variety of subordinators. Added to the existing classification of subordination in English is what I notate as Verbless subordinate clause (V-less SC). Of these 4 different types of subordinate clauses with different functions, properties, and distributions, Subjectless Verbless subordinate clause is further divided into Smallest small clause (SSC) which accounts for English subordination mechanism more uniformly and consistently with respect to their clausal architecture, especially when the subordinate clause is neither PP nor CP.

• Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.50-58
• /
• 2008

Most of Korean sentences are complex sentences which consisted of main clause and embedded clause. These complex sentences have more than one predicate and this causes various syntactic ambiguities in syntactic analysis. These ambiguities are caused by phrase attachment problems which are occurred by the modifying scope of embedded clause. To resolve it, we decide the scope of embedded clause in the sentence and consider this clause as a unit of syntactic category. In this paper, we use sentence patterns information(SPI) and syntactic properties of Korean to decide a scope of embedded clause. First, we split the complex sentence into embedded clause and main clause by the method that embedded clause must have maximal arguments. This work is done by the SPI of the predicate in the embedded clause. And then, the role of this embedded clause is converted into a noun phrases or adverbial phrases in the main clause by the properties of Korean syntax. By this method, the structure of complex sentence is exchanged into a clause. And some phrases attachment problem, which is mainly caused by the modifying scope, is resolved easily. In this paper, we call this method clausal segmentation for embedded clause. By empirical results of parsing 1000 sentences, we found that our method decreases 88.32% of syntactic ambiguities compared to the method that doesn't use SPI and split the sentence with basic clauses.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.27 no.5
• /
• pp.367-378
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to investigate the features of science language in Earth science textbooks and Earth science research articles. We examined two Earth science textbooks and two Earth science articles using the taxonomy of scientific words, the text structure analysis of explanations, the analysis of conjunctive relations and reasoning, and the function of conjunction. The results showed that school science language revealed in Earth science textbooks had high proportion of naming words and the text structures in which definition/exemplification structure and description structure were dominant. Also, internal relations that showed additional arrangement rather than logical inference, were predominant in Earth science textbooks. However, scientists' science language revealed in the Earth science articles had more proportion of process words and concept words than the Earth science textbooks and the schematic structure of explanation texts, such as orientation - implication sequence - conclusion. In addition, the text structures in each sentences of implication -sequence showed cause/effect or problem-solving after description structures. Also each sentences expressed causal or abductive reasoning through the internal relations using verbs or adverbial inflection. It is necessary that we bridge the gap between the two languages for students' authentic use of science language. For the bridging, we propose "interlanguage", which mediates between school science language and scientists' language.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartB
• /
• v.8B no.6
• /
• pp.685-692
• /
• 2001

This paper describes how to disambiguate the aspectual meaning of Japanese expression "-te iru" in Japanese-Korean machine translation Due to grammatical similarities of both languages, almost all Japanese- Korean MT systems have been developed under the direct MT strategy, in which the lexical disambiguation is essential to high-quality translation. Japanese has a progressive aspectual marker “-te iru" which is difficult to translate into Korean equivalents because in Korean there are two different progressive aspectual markers: "-ko issta" for "action progressive" and "-e issta" for "state progressive". Moreover, the aspectual system of both languages does not quite coincide with each other, so the Korean progressive aspect could not be determined by Japanese meaning of " te iru" alone. The progressive aspectural meaning may be parially determined by the meaning of predicates and also the semantic meaning of predicates may be partially reshicted by adverbials, so all Japanese predicates are classified into five classes : the 1nd verb is used only for "action progrssive",2nd verb generally for "action progressive" but occasionally for "state progressive", the 3rd verb only for "state progressive", the 4th verb generally for "state progressive", but occasIonally for "action progressive", and the 5th verb for the others. Some heuristic rules are defined for disambiguation of the 2nd and 4th verbs on the basis of adverbs and abverbial phrases. In an experimental evaluation using more than 15,000 sentances from "Asahi newspapers", the proposed method improved the translation quality by about 5%, which proves that it is effective in disambiguating "-te iru" for Japanese-Korean machine translation.translation quality by about 5%, which proves that it is effective in disambiguating "-te iru" for Japanese-Korean machine translation.anslation.