• 제목/요약/키워드: APAMAT II

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.017초

간이 차음시험장치(APAMAT II)와 잔향실 차음성능의 비교 (Comparison of Sound Insulation Performance between a Simplified Test Apparatus(APAMAT II) and the Reverberation Chamber)

  • 강현주;김봉기;김현실;이경민
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2003년도 춘계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.174-177
    • /
    • 2003
  • Comparisons of measuring apparatus for sound insulation are made between a reverberation chamber and a simplified test apparatus(APAMAT II) that is used to measure sound insulation performance of inner panels for automobiles. Also, theoretical prediction by using sandwich model are made in order to compare it with experiments and to consequently provide a design tool. Comparative results show that steel ball excitation in APAMAT II has a serious problem with sound insulation performance at the low frequency region, while speaker excitation gives a good agreements with theoretical prediction.

  • PDF

점가진력에 의해 방사된 읍압을 이용한 다중 적층 흡차음 시스템의 차음 성능 예측 (Prediction of Isolation Performance of Multi-Layered Sound Barrier System Using the Sound Pressure Radiated by Point Impact)

  • 김정수;신재성;강연준
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.1081-1085
    • /
    • 2002
  • A modeling is developed to predict the isolation performance of sound barrier systems under the sound pressure radiated from excited by point impact. The predicted results are compared with the measured results obtained by using APAMAT II. This instrument provides a combination of structure-borne noise and air-borne noise, which corresponds to rolling noise, by applying the excitation system projected steel balls against the steel sheet.

  • PDF

임의의 다중 점가진을 이용한 흡차음재의 성능 예측 (Prediction of Acoustic Performance of Sound Barrier Using Multiple Random- Point Impact)

  • 신재성;강연준
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2001년도 추계학술대회논문집 II
    • /
    • pp.877-881
    • /
    • 2001
  • In this paper, a model is developed that can predict insulation performance of sound barrier systems under the action of multiple random point impact. The predicted results are compared with the measured results obtained by using APAMAT II. The results show the error due to the difference between experimental environment and theoretical assumptions. The model is needed to be improved to obtain better agreement between predicted and measured results.

  • PDF