• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.31-42
• /
• 2007

While Defense Agency fur Technology and Quality(DTaQ) has been utilized a risk assessment method as a quality assurance activity for defense goods since 1999, a risk assessment method is known to be ineffective to identify defective items. The objective of this study is to propose the new evaluation method, that adjusts a relative priority of evaluation elements using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). Newly evaluated scores have been applied to the risk assessment result of 2005 defective items to test a validity of the new evaluation model. The new model is capable to identify more high and medium risk-level items than the current method. The company risk-level gets more scores than the item risk-level in the new model.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.199-206
• /
• 2002

The application of GSIS for most route determination is provided by selecting several basic data such as land use, land construction quantity and land price, and then establishing a database to analyze for the route determination. However, this strategy rarely considers the complicated multi-factors that are essential for route determination. To solve this problem, it is required to use the GSIS and attempt to support the decision of majority for optimum route determination and standardize the route determination procedure. Accordingly, in this study, the qualification of multi-factors was attempted using the AHP technique, and so the data for the route determination was provided effectively, which resulted in the optimum route determination. As a result of applying the AHP technique, optimum routes were selected more rationally than randomly applying the values of multi-factors as before.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.11D no.2
• /
• pp.381-386
• /
• 2004

Because of rapid increase of internet user, numerous popular web sites have been made on the internet but it is hard to find out a systematic technique for the selection of qualified web site in consumer position. Generally, there are black box, white box and gray box viewpoint for evaluating web site. In this paper present evaluation criteria based on AHP(Analysis Hierarchy Process) technique of black box viewpoint for optimal web site selection in consumer position. We considered usability, efficiency, compatibility based on ISO/IEC 9126 for quality measurement of web site and executed practical analysis about web site in internet. This paper show that the proposed selection technique is applicable to optimal web site selection.

• Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.763-771
• /
• 2010

The rapid increase of wildlife passage installation since the late 2000s was aimed to reduce roadkill caused by habitat fragmentation and losses related to road construction, but wildlife-vehicle collisions are now still occurred even near the wildlife passage area. This is the reason that the effectiveness of wildlife passage have not been evaluated in combination with absence of monitoring data and management strategy of the wildlife passage. The AHP method are used, in this study, to identify the evaluation factors affecting the effectiveness of the present 367 wildlife passages in a mitigation measures to reduce road effects on wildlife species. Ten evaluation factors are derived from third levels in the AHP analysis. Priority setting to identify appropriate management strategies in first level is selected among four second levels on facility, environment, wildlife species and management tool. The AHP analysis suggested that neighboring environments are the most important factor at the second level, and passage structure, harmony with natural surroundings, wildlife occurrence and monitoring of the passage are also important factors at the third levels. In summary, effective measurements of wildlife passage management is based on managing the passage with neighboring topography and natural surrounding. This is useful to establish wildlife passage management strategy in order to reduce the negative effects of roads on wildlife species.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.157-159
• /
• 2008

This paper has been studied traffic accident using intelligence prediction algorithm. and wish to prevent accident by guiding in 2 km ahead the accident that occur in fog section and a snow-covered road, sudden roadworks and sharp curve section, etc and removing fog and snow automatically using the ubiquitous and intelligence technique. If we can predict of traffic accident, we can prevent the many traffic accident. In this paper, we present neural network approach for prediction of traffic accident. Computer simulation results prove that reducing the average vehicle waiting time which proposed considering prevention of traffic algorithm for optimal traffic cycle is better than fixed signal method which dose not using prevention of traffic algorithm.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.616-620
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 홍수피해 잠재능 산정을 위하여 항목별 가중치 산정을 통한 계층화분석기법의 적용성을 평가하고자 한다. 홍수피해 잠재능 산정의 경우 유역의 특성에 따른 다양한 항목과 가중치를 적절하게 고려하여야 한다. 그러나 도시화 지역의 경우 외수력과 우수관 미설치에 대한 고려 없이 미리 정해진 절차에 의해 이루어지므로 실제 현장 조건을 정확하게 모사하지 못하고 있다. 따라서 위에서 언급한 것과 같이 두 가지 주요 항목을 홍수피해 잠재능 산정 절차에 반영하여 실제 상황을 보다 잘 모사하고 다양한 전문가 집단의 설문 결과를 반영하여 보다 정확한 판단을 하는 것이 필요하다. 연구결과 항목별 가중치 산정은 주요 항목의 가중치를 산정하는데 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 또한 외수력과 우수관 설치를 고려한 수정 방법은 홍수피해 잠재능 산정에서 보다 좋은 결과를 제시하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.24 no.8
• /
• pp.81-88
• /
• 2008

In this study, to determine the priority of the effect factors and the preferences of commonly used reinforcing methods for the cut-slope, the reasonable analysis using AHP technique was performed. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique is the most widely used method out of all existing decision making methods. On choosing the methods, the most important factor is analyzed to be the stability and durability. Stability, durability and environmental compatibility took up over 50% of the total contributing factors. Cut-slope reinforced method preference with increasing stability method confirmed that concrete retaining wall, reinforced-soil wall and cutting method showed the highest preference rate. Also, in practical field conditions, the cutting method out of four methods was chosen to be the most effective method. This reflected that the methods that are equally superior in all aspects of evaluation factors are more important than the methods with superiority in highly prioritized evaluation factors.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.406-409
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 교육행정의 합리화와 정보화를 위해 일선 교육현장에서 구축되어 활용하고 있는 교육행정정보시스템(National Education Information System; NEIS)에 대해 시스템의 운용실태와 문제점을 분석하고 NEIS의 효과적인 활용방안을 모색하기 위한 목적을 가지고 있다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위하여 본 연구에서 NEIS의 효과적인 활용에 영향을 미치는 영향을 도출하여, 이를 계층화하여 계층모델을 구성하고 구성요인의 중요도 평가를 통해 NEIS의 효과적 활용방안을 분석하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 NEIS의 성과분석을 위하여 성과척도를 관리적 요인과 기술적 요인별로 분류하고 각 요인별 중요변수를 설정하였고, NEIS의 효과적 활용에 미치는 요인의 중요성 산출을 위하여 Fuzzy AHP 기법을 이용하여 1단계 관리적 요인 및 기술적 요인과 그 하위 요인을 구성하여 중요 요인간 분석을 실시하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2000.04a
• /
• pp.437-440
• /
• 2000

본 연구에서는 제품 개발과 관련된 시장 환경 요소들을 고려하여 신속한 제품 개발에 관한 의사 결정을 할 수 있는 AHP 모형을 제안하고, 정량화 된 데이터를 이용한 AHP 의사결정 프로세스를 구축하고자 하였다. AHP 모형의 경우 전문가 집단(연구원 집단, 엔지니어 집단, 판매자 집단)별로 의사결정의 차이점을 보여 줌으로서 각각의 시장 상황에 맞는 의사결정을 경영자가 효율적으로 판단할 수 있도록 제시하였으며, 신제품 디자인 선정의 간단한 프로세스를 제시하여 반복적인 생산자의 의사 결정을 합리적이고 신속하게 할 수 있는 방법론을 제시하였다. 프로세스에서는 하위 의사결정 단계에서 가능한 데이터의 정량화를 통해 쌍별 비교 행렬을 만듦으로써, AMP기법의 정확성을 높이고 모델의 민감도 분석이 가능하게 하였다.

• Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy
• /
• v.19 no.5
• /
• pp.453-459
• /
• 2008

In general, reliability of AHP depends on pairwise comparison of evaluators. In addition, human judgment on the importance of alternatives or criteria is always imprecise and vague. The Fuzzy AHP technique is suggested and used widely recently. In this paper, we prioritize future energy technology development for well focused R&D. We selected 3 criteria and 10 sub-criteria. According to the result in this study, the most important sub-criterion is the precedence over other competitive technology, the second is the possibility for fundamental technology acquisition, and the third is the improvement energy efficiency. The other side, the lowest important sub-criterion is the technology level compared with advanced countries.