• Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.8-14
• /
• 2013

Deep beam shall be designed either by taking into account nonlinear distribution of strain or by Appendix A of Strut-and-Tie Models (STM) according to ACI 318(M) from version of 2002. Although STM is accepted as tool in design Discontinuity region (D-region) which mostly exist in Deep beam, Corbels, Dapped ends etc., it has been modified by many researchers. In this study we design deep beam by STMs which use simple truss for load distribution and the model of complex truss for load distribution compare with the ACI traditional which is designed by flexure design method and shear provided by concrete($V_c$) as provided in special provisions section of 11.8 in ACI 318-99 [1]. This study aims to find the different and efficiency of deep beam design based on variation of parameter compiled from many samples selected from ACI traditional and two model of STMs, simple and complex load distribution.

• Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.15 no.6
• /
• pp.64-69
• /
• 2003

• Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.34-39
• /
• 2014

• Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.20 no.5
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2008

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.437-446
• /
• 2014

In this study, the ultimate strengths of 13 slab-column joints and 51 torsional beams were evaluated to verify the validity of the strut-tie model approach presented in the companion paper. In addition, the design of the bridge pier subjected to multiple load combinations with longitudinal and lateral loads was conducted. The analysis results were compared with those by the provisions of BS 8110, ACI 318, and AASHTO-LRFD. The design results of the bridge pier were also compared with those by the provisions of ACI 318's sectional design method and AASHTO-LRFD's strut-tie model method.

• Computational Structural Engineering
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.6-13
• /
• 1989

현재 구조해석의 컴퓨터 응용과 건축설계도면작성의 컴퓨터 응용이 개별적으로 개발되는 경우가 많은데 한꺼번에 모든 시스템을 일련으로 연결하는 것은 쉬운 일이 아니므로, 우선 구조해석의 자료를 그대로 이용할 수 있는 골조도면작성의 컴퓨터 응용프로그램을 개발함으로써 앞으로 건축설계도면작성 프로그램과 연결도 고려할 수 있다고 본다. 본 CAD시스템은 현재에는 국내에서 통용되고 있는 건설부 규준에 의거하여 개발되었고, ACI의 극한강도 설계법으로 sub-program을 수정하여 이용할 수 있겠다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 2008.11a
• /
• pp.899-902
• /
• 2008

The GFRP rebar have been interested as the substituting material of the conventional steel rebar to the concrete structure for high durable concrete structure. The GFRP rebar, however, has different way to be fabricated and mechanical characteristics comparing with the conventional steel rebar. Therefore, to apply the GFRP rebar to the construction field, it needs the proper and reasonable design theory, codes and guidelines. In this study, for the design recommendation of the GFRP rebar, ACI440.IR and ISIS Canada design manual were investigated and concluded that the design theory of ISIS Canada design manual was relatively better design concept considering the limit state of the GFRP rebar in design and analysis. With this design concept, new design equation for the GFRP rebar was suggested and investigated with other design equations.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.731-740
• /
• 2011

Provisions for the redistribution of negative moments in KCI 2007 and ACI 318-08 use a method for continuous flexural members subjected to uniformly-distributed gravity load. Moment redistributions and plastic rotations in beams of reinforced concrete moment frames subjected to lateral load differ from those in continuous flexural members due to gravity load. In the present study, a quantitative relationship between the moment redistribution and plastic rotation is established for beams subjected to both lateral and gravity loads. Based on the relationship, a design method for the redistribution of negative moments is proposed based on a plastic rotation capacity. The percentage change in negative moments in the beam was defined as a function of the tensile strain of re-bars at the section of maximum negative moment, which is determined by a section analysis at an ultimate state using KCI 2007 and ACI 318-08. Span, reinforcement ratio, cracked section stiffness, and strain-hardening behavior substantially affected the moment redistribution. Design guidelines and examples for the redistribution of the factored negative moments determined by elastic theory for beams under lateral load are presented.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.40 no.4
• /
• pp.371-381
• /
• 2020

The failure mode of concrete reinforced with FRP is defined as the concrete crushing and the fiber rupture and the definition of limit state is a slightly different according to the design methods. It is relatively difficult to predict of FRP reinforced concrete because the mechanical properties of fibers are quite depending on its of fibers. The design code by ACI440 committee, which has been developed mainly on GFRP having low modulus of elasticity, is widely used, but the applicability on other FRPs of this code has not been sufficiently verified. In addition, the ultimate and serviceability limit state based on the ACI440 are comparatively difficult to predict the behavior of member with the 0.8~1.2 𝜌_b because crushing and rupturing failure can be occurred simultaneously is in this region of reinforcement ratio, and predicted deflection is too sensitive according to the loading condition. Therefore, in this study, reliability and convenience of the prediction of structural performance by design methods such as ACI440 and MC90 concept, respectively, were examined through the experimental results and literature review of the beam and slab with the reinforcement ratio of 0.8 ~ 1.4. As a result of the analysis, it can be applied to the FRP reinforced structure in the case of the simple moment-curvature formula (LIM-MC) of Model Code, and the limit state design method based on the EC2 is more reliable than the ultimate strength design method.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.33-42
• /
• 1981

Current standard code for R.C. design consists of two conventional design parts, so called WSD and USD, which are based on ACI 318-63 and 318-71 code provisions. The safety factors of our WSD and USD design criteria which are taken primarily from ACI 318-63 code are considered to be not appropriate compared to out country's design and construction practices. Furthermore, even the ACI safety factors are not determined from probabilistic study but merely from experiences and practices. This study investigates the safety level of R.C. flexural members designed by the current WSD safety provisions based on Second Moment Reliability theory, and proposes a rational but efficient way of determining the nominal safety factors and the associated flexural allowable stresses of steel bars and concretes in order to provide a consistent level of target reliability. Cornell's Mean First-Order Second Moment Method formulae by a log normal transformation of resistance and load output variables are adopted as the reliability analysis method for this study. The compressive allowable stress formulae are derived by a unique approach in which the balanced steel ratios of the resulting design are chosen to be the corresponding under-reinforced sections designed by strength design method with an optimum reinforcing ratio. The target reliability index for the safety provisions are considered to be ${\beta}=4$ that is well suited for our level of construction and design practices. From a series of numerical applications to investigate the safety and reliability of R.C. flexural members designed by current WSD code, it has been found that the design based on WSD provision results in uneconomical design because of unusual and inconsistent reliability. A rational set of reliability based safety factors and allowable stress of steel bars and concrete for flexural members is proposed by providing the appropriate target reliability ${\beta}=4$.