• 제목/요약/키워드: 4 steps damper

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.018초

상용차 운전석의 수동식 가변댐퍼에 대한 동적특성 해석 (Dynamic Characteristics Analysis of A Manually-Controlled Damper for Driver's Seat of Commercial Vehicles)

  • 박재우;백운경;김영호
    • 한국정밀공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국정밀공학회 1995년도 추계학술대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.518-523
    • /
    • 1995
  • To improve the set comfort of commercial vehicles in various road conditions, it is necessary to design a seat shock absorber which can avoid the vibration zone imposing the discomfort feeling and fatigue on drivers. Through the vibration and dynamic analysis, a shock absorber that has 4 steps of damping ability is developed. Dynamic characteristics analysis of the seat damper is performed considering each valve and oil path for the design purpose.

  • PDF

Compensating time delay in semi-active control of a SDOF structure with MR damper using predictive control

  • Bathaei, Akbar;Zahrai, Seyed Mehdi
    • Structural Engineering and Mechanics
    • /
    • 제82권4호
    • /
    • pp.445-458
    • /
    • 2022
  • Some of the control systems used in engineering structures that use sensors and decision systems have some time delay reducing efficiency of the control system or even might make it unstable. In this research, in addition to considering the effect of the time delay in vibration control process, predictive control is used to compensate the time delay. A semi-active vibration control approach with the help of magneto-rheological dampers is implemented. In addition to using fuzzy inference system to determine the appropriate control voltage for MR damper, structural behavior prediction system and specifying future responses are also used such that the time delays occurring within control process are overcome. For this purpose, determination of prediction horizon is conducted for one, five, and ten steps ahead for single degree of freedom structures with periods ranging from 0.1 to 4 seconds, subjected to twenty earthquake excitations. The amount of time delay applied to the control system is 0.1 seconds. The obtained results indicate that for 0.1 second time delay, average prediction error values compared to the case without time delay is 3.47 percent. Having 0.1 second time delay in a semi-active control system reduces its efficiency by 11.46 percent; while after providing the control system with structure behavior prediction, the difference in the results for the control system without time delay is just 1.35 percent on average; indicating a 10.11 percent performance improvement for the control system.

Earthquake Response of Mid-rise to High-rise Buildings with Friction Dampers

  • Kaur, Naveet;Matsagar, V.A.;Nagpal, A.K.
    • 국제초고층학회논문집
    • /
    • 제1권4호
    • /
    • pp.311-332
    • /
    • 2012
  • Earthquake response of mid-rise to high-rise buildings provided with friction dampers is investigated. The steel buildings are modelled as shear-type structures and the investigation involved modelling of the structures of varying heights ranging from five storeys to twenty storeys, in steps of five storeys, subjected to real earthquake ground motions. Three basic types of structures considered in the study are: moment resisting frame (MRF), braced frame (BF), and friction damper frame (FDF). Mathematical modelling of the friction dampers involved simulation of the two distinct phases namely, the stick phase and the slip phase. Dynamic time history analyses are carried out to study the variation of the top floor acceleration, top floor displacement, storey shear, and base-shear. Further, energy plots are obtained to investigate the energy dissipation by the friction dampers. It is seen that substantial earthquake response reduction is achieved with the provision of the friction dampers in the mid-rise and high-rise buildings. The provision of the friction dampers always reduces the base-shear. It is also seen from the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the top floor acceleration that there is substantial reduction in the peak response; however, the higher frequency content in the response has increased. For the structures considered, the top floor displacements are lesser in the FDF than in the MRF; however, the top floor displacements are marginally larger in the FDF than in the BF.