• Title/Summary/Keyword: 2004년 대통령 탄핵

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Study on Impeachment of President Roh Moo-hyun in Editorial cartoon (만평 속 노무현대통령 탄핵 연구)

  • Park, keong-cheol
    • Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
    • /
    • 2018.05a
    • /
    • pp.99-100
    • /
    • 2018
  • '노무현대통령 탄핵'이 2004년 3월 12일에 발생하였으며, 시민은 촛불시위로 탄핵을 반대하였다. 이후 헌법재판소는 5월 14일에 탄핵소추를 부결하였다. 본 연구는 '노무현대통령 탄핵'을 소재로 하는 경향신문의 만평을 분석하였으며, '만평의 표현 '과 '만평의 인물과 사건'을 통해 만평 속 '노무현대통령 탄핵'을 분석하였다.

  • PDF

A Study on the Records of Presidential Impeachment in 2004 in the Public Domain (공공영역의 2004년 대통령 탄핵사건 기록)

  • Oh, Myung-Jin
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.32
    • /
    • pp.45-78
    • /
    • 2012
  • The significance of Presidential Impeachment in 2004 is subject to interpretations in many different contexts, but its nature as its justice was the constitutional trial by the nation's impeachment system. This study set out to compare and analyze the understanding of the event centered around its nature as "an impeachment event as a public activity" and the records related to it. For that purpose, the study attempted to analyze the impeachment event to understand it as a public activity and examined and analyzed the records of the impeachment event in the public domain through personal visit, phone interview, and request of information disclosure based on the analysis results. An impeachment event as a public activity can be understood as an activity carried out by the National Assembly, which is to issue a motion for impeachment under the norms of the nation's impeachment system, and Constitutional Court, which is responsible for impeachment trial, through their unique rights prescribed in the Constitution. The important subjects of such a public activity included the accused president, the acting presidential system created by the motion for impeachment, and the National Election Commission that provided a decisive ground for impeachment. It was confirmed that the records, which are legal requirements, were well created and have been preserved and managed in the public domain. However, it was difficult to conclude that the records of the impeachment event were thoroughly created in terms of content in relation to affairs as they mainly covered the superficial treatment processes and the results of explicit activities. There was, in particular, the absence of records showing the context of activity.